| Re: Full Fathom Five by vulcan |
15-Sep-02/9:50 AM |
|
I have to say that 'Far from the madding crowd' is perhaps the most tedious, boring, long, boring, long, tedious piece of writing I have ever been forced to read.
|
|
|
 |
| Re: The silent lecture(secret names) by horus8 |
15-Sep-02/9:48 AM |
|
|
 |
| Re: How? Well... by RWAndersen |
14-Sep-02/10:17 AM |
|
Poor god damnit. I just said. Oh fuck I suppose I have to vote. 10.
|
|
|
 |
| Re: How? Well... by RWAndersen |
14-Sep-02/10:16 AM |
|
|
 |
| Re: Babys Got Blue Eyes by w~* ATHENA *~w |
14-Sep-02/10:16 AM |
|
|
 |
| Re: Remember-me (an ode to those dropped off at the clinic) by Bachus |
13-Sep-02/5:02 PM |
|
|
 |
| Re: a comment on pissed off pretentious prat by keatsImnot |
13-Sep-02/3:38 PM |
|
HI I HAVE AN OBSESSION WITH POETANDKNOWIT THAT I CAN'T LET GO
|
|
|
 |
| Re: America the Beautiful? by pink_punk_kisses87 |
13-Sep-02/3:15 PM |
Yes! This is it! This is the most profound, beautiful, profound comment on America's society today that I have ever seen! How did you think of it, pink_punk_kisses87? It's such a through-and-through masterpiece that I hardly know where to begin... The title itself is sheer genius. Just imagine -- taking a popular catchphrase, "America the beautiful", and putting a question mark at the end!!! What better way to simultaneously subvert the reader's expectations and set the introspective, questioning tone for the rest of the piece?? Brilliant!
Now, before I continue, let me tell you that usually I have no sympathy for poemes that deal with "issues". But you have managed to capture the essence of suffering and needless brutality in a way that I had scarcely dreamt of! All the images -- so cliched, yet in your incredible hands, so fresh! A beaten woman - a hungry child - drugs - bereavement - depression - lost love. These, yes, these are the issues of the times. Oh wait, sorry. For a minute there I thought your poeme was good.
|
|
|
 |
| Re: 9/11 by dougsoderstrom |
13-Sep-02/3:06 PM |
|
dougsoderstrom, do you love me?
|
|
|
 |
| Re: a comment on Mermaid at Dawn by <~> |
13-Sep-02/3:04 PM |
|
Frass...oh, Frass. The harder you gallop up the stairs of erudition, the more easily the peasants can see you sweat.
|
|
|
 |
| Re: Hard Times by beakism |
13-Sep-02/2:59 PM |
|
I'm ashamed of you, beakism. Not only are you a shameless thief, you are also an heinous misquoter! Good day.
|
|
|
 |
| Re: a comment on cival by dylansong |
12-Sep-02/9:02 PM |
|
Let A be pink_punk_kisses87's comment. ~A.
|
|
|
 |
| Re: a comment on Epitome of Pathetic by royalflesh |
12-Sep-02/8:59 PM |
|
Why take it as a compliment? Did you think I meant it as one, or do you think there is something good about reading too many lyrics?
|
|
|
 |
| Re: a comment on Mermaid at Dawn by <~> |
12-Sep-02/8:56 PM |
|
The more someone desperately tries to sound "aloof" and "witty", the more they clearly do care. And you, Frass, are sounding suspiciously "aloof" and "witty". I hope I never turn into the sort of person who uses phrases like "your very common brand of empty vitriol simply doesn't rate or raise a rankle with me". You know it's BS, I know it's BS, and poetandknowit knows it's BS. Why not save everyone the trouble and just admit that he pisses you off?
|
|
|
 |
| Re: a comment on Life's Great Irony by Tascobar |
12-Sep-02/11:57 AM |
|
Aren't we allowed to label a poeme as being of a particular form but then subvert that form? Next you'll be threatening to remove haiku status from any poeme that doesn't talk about nature and contain two contrasting images. Pffft.
|
|
|
 |
| Re: a comment on AIDS Bonanza! by -=Dark_Angel=-, P.I. |
12-Sep-02/9:27 AM |
|
VERY GOOD I NEVER SAW IT COMING
|
|
|
 |
| Re: a comment on AIDS Bonanza! by -=Dark_Angel=-, P.I. |
12-Sep-02/9:22 AM |
|
"I think it has a show there, you know"?
|
|
|
 |
| Re: Epitome of Pathetic by royalflesh |
12-Sep-02/7:26 AM |
|
I think you've been reading too many lyrics.
|
|
|
 |
| Re: a comment on Unfortunate Semen Incident by -=Dark_Angel=-, P.I. |
11-Sep-02/6:54 PM |
|
From my point of view, it's "Milwaukee" that doesn't quite fit the rhyme. "Hierarchy" has a silent "r" when pronounced in the Queen's English.
|
|
|
 |
| Re: want it by sontei |
11-Sep-02/6:44 PM |
|
Expand upon the second stanza. I am intrigued as to how the suggestion of nudity pans out!
|
|
|
 |