agreed.

I'm surprised nobody complained about the line, "of wet sods beside a cold house in ’04" Now there's a line that cries out for mudslinging.

Please tell me what the considerable theme is, because I'm at a loss.

That poet would see past the trivia, would occasionally notice the value, even comment on the worth, i.e.: “I can't think of how to re-word it, though. Sorry I can't be more help; it's a cute little rhyme.” “Some of this is really nice. The rhythm, though, is so almost-regular it really hits you where it's not. Other than that, good.” “’To so confuse the daffodils’ would be better said ‘That so confuses daffodils?’ Otherwise, swell. 10” “I think the clinical sound of 'goal' is great.” “It's a companion piece for richa's dandelion clocks, maybe - and heavier on the Darwinism, which is ace. ‘Seeds are the goal’ is the best description of flowers I've read in a long time.” “I'm reversing myself. Clothes is fine, but you need an extra syllable or two: ‘The best art only clothes the truth’ would do.” I miss that poet.

Thank you. It touches my insides too, as if there's a place there that inspires the building of these magnificant churches even while I wonder at the meaning of it.

Thank you. It is a bit sad, unable to know the answers.

hahaha... BURN! this kicks major booty dude... more than stephen's fat ass

IT MEANS NON-SHINY you dumbass

It's not as empty-headed as the legions of comments saying "show don't tell". People just see other people writing "show don't tell", then think it sounds catchy and wise, then end up smearing it everywhere themselves. It's a disease.

I see your point, and it's well taken.