Free verse № 105890
Center Of The Universe
When I think how each small life
Feels itself the center of the universe,
How sunshine, rain, or food is good or bad,
Depending on need,
How conditions carry different meanings,
For each thing that lives,
I fill with wonder and despair
At how the world ends
A thousand times a minute.
If I crush an insect,
The sun is blotted out,
The stars fall,
The earth is shattered,
For ever and ever.
The universe ceases to be
For that living thing.
But of course it was only an insect.
30 comments
I was thinking that if you want to keep it, maybe saying a specific kind of bug would add quite a bit. Like "a stinkbug";
"no matter, it was only a stinkbug"
And end the poem with: "No matter, it was only a poet."
world from a very narrow and self-centered position.
All things are inter-related and connected but this
fact is largely unconsidered. Even an insect should
be left alone if it is not bothersome. Well done.
What's illogical is your ill-considered notion that all animals are equally deserving of life, whatever their aesthetic value, which you've already refuted by pointing out that you're drawn to save cute animals such as whales, puppies, baby seals, and young Aboriginals, but not ugly ones like insects or adult Aboriginals.
Is it not more likely that endearing animals are simply better-equipped to survive in a human-dominated world than non-endearing ones are, and that all this nonsense about saving the ugly ones not only reeks of all the worst aspects of communism, but is also a MAJOR FLOUTING OF GOD'S IRON LAWS OF NATURE???!
What's more, saying a poem, story, or nearly anything else is 'about' one thing or other is silly to the max. The only context I could imagine in which two people might reasonably be talking about what something is 'about' is some casual conversation, most likely simply for the purposes of identification, i.e.:
Chad: Have you read "Center of the Universe" by Dovina?
Brad: I don't remember. What's it about?
Chad: It's about a person stepping on a bug.
Brad: Oh, right. No.
In short, I'm afraid I'm going to have to cut you off here. No hard feelings.
-zodiac
PS-What's with saying "I knew a poet who..." all the time? Is that a... JIBE???!?
âI can't think of how to re-word it, though. Sorry I can't be more help; it's a cute little rhyme.â
âSome of this is really nice. The rhythm, though, is so almost-regular it really hits you where it's not. Other than that, good.â
ââTo so confuse the daffodilsâ would be better said âThat so confuses daffodils?â Otherwise, swell. 10â
âI think the clinical sound of 'goal' is great.â
âIt's a companion piece for richa's dandelion clocks, maybe - and heavier on the Darwinism, which is ace. âSeeds are the goalâ is the best description of flowers I've read in a long time.â
âI'm reversing myself. Clothes is fine, but you need an extra syllable or two: âThe best art only clothes the truthâ would do.â
I miss that poet.
Log in to add a comment.