| Re: Racism 2 by Dovina |
zodiac 209.193.18.212 |
14-Jan-06/10:47 AM |
|
I cannot fucking believe you're still doing this. Please, for once take the hint: YOU DON'T KNOW ABOUT MINORITIES. YOU DON'T ACTUALLY KNOW ANY BLACK PEOPLE. EVERYTHING YOU WRITE ABOUT THEM COMES OFF SOUNDING INSANE.
|
|
|
 |
| Re: a comment on A Haiku by amanda_dcosta |
ALChemy 24.74.101.159 |
14-Jan-06/5:09 AM |
|
Yes and I can speak Chinese, see: "Ching chang wongtong longshlong."
Just research Haikus on Google search and come to your own conclusion.
|
|
|
 |
| Re: Racism 2 by Dovina |
ALChemy 24.74.101.159 |
14-Jan-06/5:03 AM |
|
This would be relevent in the 1960s or to people in their 60s. Besides, ethnic people aren't trying to end racism through being nice. They're just being nice.
I do love the fact that I'm pretty much guaranteed a few fancy words whenever I read your poems.
|
|
|
 |
| Re: Flow by zodiac |
amanda_dcosta 203.145.159.37 |
14-Jan-06/3:25 AM |
|
|
 |
| Re: a comment on A Haiku by amanda_dcosta |
amanda_dcosta 203.145.159.37 |
14-Jan-06/1:18 AM |
|
|
 |
| Re: Racism 2 by Dovina |
amanda_dcosta 203.145.159.37 |
14-Jan-06/12:04 AM |
|
Dovina, I hope you don't mind, but, personally I feel you haven't conveyed your matter very clearly. Somehow, I don't feel very impressed by it.
|
|
|
 |
| Re: A Haiku by amanda_dcosta |
ecargo 172.137.66.171 |
13-Jan-06/10:16 PM |
|
Or even six-eight-six (or some other variation) if done right. The syllable count is the least of it. Very few (not I) can do it well, though.
Your name is fun to say.
|
|
|
 |
| Re: eat your dinner meats by calliope |
ecargo 172.137.66.171 |
13-Jan-06/10:12 PM |
|
"beef we don't need is still beef indeed" nailed it for me.
|
|
|
 |
| Re: a comment on levity kiss by skaskowski |
skaskowski 70.225.165.248 |
13-Jan-06/10:05 PM |
|
|
 |
| Re: Sky All Around Me (goddess edit) by ecargo |
amanda_dcosta 203.145.159.37 |
13-Jan-06/9:33 PM |
|
The idea's quite good though the presentation could have been a bit more connected. I liked it. Keep it up.
|
|
|
 |
| Re: A Haiku by amanda_dcosta |
amanda_dcosta 203.145.159.37 |
13-Jan-06/9:28 PM |
|
This might be way off. Criticism welcome. I'm trying to figure it out..... though haven't had a lot of time to think about it. With kids.........!
|
|
|
 |
| Re: angst of the saints by calliope |
Dovina 69.175.32.104 |
13-Jan-06/12:51 PM |
|
It seems the last line should be, "i'm just as surprised as you when i reply."
|
|
|
 |
| Re: levity kiss by skaskowski |
Dovina 69.175.32.104 |
13-Jan-06/12:49 PM |
|
I'm glad you explained that. But why not just let the first line be: Leviticus, levity kiss.
"singed with lipstick" is good.
|
|
|
 |
| Re: a comment on The Prayer Vendor by Enkidu |
Dovina 69.175.32.104 |
13-Jan-06/11:49 AM |
|
I see how that can be, but how many readers will even get through the unusual words in your large vocabulary to start thinking about an obsucre metaphor like that.
|
|
|
 |
| Re: Window Washer (midtown) by ecargo |
Dental Panic 84.27.6.94 |
13-Jan-06/10:15 AM |
|
|
 |
| Re: a comment on cat by Dental Panic |
ALChemy 24.74.101.159 |
13-Jan-06/8:36 AM |
|
I've read newspaper articles devoted to the "Religion is the major cause of war argument." It's certainly common enough to have crossed my path several times in television and print.
What I meant by examples were entire countries or civilizations of atheists and how they compared with the religious ones.
Aside from those two things I agree with you, especially with the part about greed being the major reason for most wars.
|
|
|
 |
| Re: a comment on cat by Dental Panic |
ecargo 167.219.0.143 |
13-Jan-06/7:16 AM |
|
Who says that? No atheist I know. I can't imagine anyone out of their teens claiming anything so broad and patently ridiculous. Greed underlies most "religious" conflicts--it's just the poor suckers fighting for the ideal, it always seems. If you got rid of man, there'd be no war; otherwise? Not likely.
I didn't say anything here; I just noted what Einstein said. Sure it has merit. And there are plenty of examples of it in practice--do you think altruism is linked exclusively to religion? That's nonsense. So-called "religious" people (many of whom seem to think that declaring that they "believe in" God gives them some sort of automatic moral superiority) are no more likely to be moral, kind, good, giving, just, etc., than nonreligious people.
|
|
|
 |
| Re: Brogues are best by Stephen Robins |
Caducus 172.213.134.2 |
13-Jan-06/6:51 AM |
|
A similar style to Dark Angel and pretty amusing.
Are you related?
|
|
|
 |
| Re: The funeral and the table by Caducus |
Caducus 172.213.134.2 |
13-Jan-06/6:49 AM |
|
Formerly another poem altogether. A change of style nad experimental for me here and suggestions (if any) most welcome.
|
|
|
 |
| Re: a comment on cat by Dental Panic |
ALChemy 24.74.101.159 |
13-Jan-06/5:57 AM |
|
And a better answer than Hawking's. His religious wife probably hid the penis inflator after that interview.
|
|
|
 |