Re: Ode to -=Dick_Angle=- by Bobjim the II	31-Dec-02/11:03 AM
-=Unperceptive_and_forumlaic=-
Re: this one is for Jon by tstormer	31-Dec-02/11:00 AM
I think what you've done there is confused "poetry" with "prose". It's an easy mistake to make. 10!!!
Re: Lovers leave their marks by scitz	30-Dec-02/4:17 AM
Great use of 'look' to rhyme with 'book'!!!
Re: a comment on Some Things by Christof	30-Dec-02/4:14 AM
great!
Re: Some Things by Christof	30-Dec-02/4:13 AM
you like the word 'pucker'
Re: Blues by Christof	30-Dec-02/4:12 AM
Think. Feel. Explore.
Re: a comment on Front, Porch, Swing. by horus8	30-Dec-02/3:56 AM
And what are PAKI's thoughts on religion? I bet they're stupid and wrong.
Re: a comment on Excommunication by inch of candle - Jesus wants me for a bum ream. An narrative in so many verses that madam palms readings have been savarlay curtailed by ==Doylum	29-Dec-02/4:50 PM
Ahh but I am dead. For, just like the crotch of my stained (but proud) Y-fronts, I have perished. I'm commenting from Heaven with all the other dark angels. That's why I keep reading Bible stories. I'm with Jesu now. Don't weep for me. I'm with Jesu now. I'm with Jesu now... [fade out]
Re: a comment on Birth by nentwined	29-Dec-02/4:47 PM
How about: "ends with placenta" ?
Re: A Short Letter by Ranger	29-Dec-02/4:36 PM
You wish you were Chaucer? Have you ever read Chaucer? The buggere can't spelle to save his life!!!!!!!11 lol! lmao! rotfl! HYUK HYUK! asl?
Re: When I wake... by Topaz Servias	29-Dec-02/4:26 PM
You want to see her wipe?
Re: a comment on Mangled by Carvaceous	29-Dec-02/4:25 PM
What an amazingly unpretentious comment! Great use of the words 'allusion' and 'pertain'! KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK!
Re: Mangled by Carvaceous	29-Dec-02/4:22 PM
Puppeteer *IS* vile
Re: Excommunication by inch of candle - Jesus wants me for a bum ream. An narrative in so many verses that madam palms readings have been savarlay curtailed by ==Doylum	29-Dec-02/7:24 AM
Did you know that Noah took a vine with him on the ark. When the floods subsided, he planted a vineyard and drank of the wine and was drunken; and he was uncovered within his tent. And Ham, one of Noah's sons, saw the nakedness of his father and told his two brothers with delight! His brothers returned to the tent with a garment and covered Noah with their faces turned so that they would not see their father's nudity. And Noah awoke from his wine, and knew what Ham had done unto him. And he said, Cursed be Canaan, Son of Ham; a server of servants shall he be unto his brethren!
Re: a comment on Things by Quarton	27-Dec-02/4:07 AM
All those things can be done by a computer. Does that mean computers are sentient? I thought you were going to attempt to refute the claim that something is sentient if and only if it intentionally conceals its nudity by saying that people living in nudist colonies would, if the nudity theory was true, not be sentient. Indeed they are not sentient.
Re: a comment on Things by Quarton	27-Dec-02/4:01 AM
Not as funny as your face, ANIMAL MURDERER!
Re: a comment on Things by Quarton	26-Dec-02/5:22 PM
Well I think the very least a whale could do would be to weave some sort of nappy out of seaweed, don't you? As regards doggie sweaters: unless the doggie intentionally wears the sweaters to conceal its nudity (as opposed to your disgusting, sick neighbour forcibly clothing the wretched aminal), then I cannot accept that it satisfies the proposed criteria for sentience.
Re: a comment on Things by Quarton	26-Dec-02/5:12 PM
So does that mean you think contraception for animals is naughty?
Re: a comment on Things by Quarton	26-Dec-02/1:36 PM
Consider this: As a result of contraception, loads of people aren't being born. If given the choice, those people would probably opt for existence. Therefore contraception is naughty.
Re: Things by Quarton	26-Dec-02/1:29 PM
Ask yourself this: How can something that intentionally spends its entire life in the nude be sentient?