Re: a comment on greymo(u)rn by lmp	lmp 141.154.134.3	9-Jan-06/10:34 AM
i have read some Hemmingway. depressed chap but a good writer, no? perhaps this is why one writes crap after reading his work; it is strong stuff but has the tendency (at least with me) to leave me drained of any real focus.
Re: We'll be right back after these messages by INTRANSIT	amanda_dcosta 203.145.159.37	9-Jan-06/10:29 AM
Hmmm, Ahem, .... I'm speechless. A bit weird I feel, or maybe its not got to me well enough.
Re: a comment on Sunlighting by ALChemy	ALChemy 24.74.101.159	9-Jan-06/10:15 AM
That's OK cyan9. It's about the most important priority in life, children.
Re: a comment on Birmingham gardens by INTRANSIT	<~> 167.206.181.179	9-Jan-06/9:52 AM
yeah, that kid's not getting in no matter what. big ups for the buffy-esque name, though.
Re: a comment on Birmingham gardens by INTRANSIT	zodiac 209.193.14.113	9-Jan-06/9:50 AM
I guess it's too late to pretend to be Xander Vanderoest.
Re: a comment on Reckoning by <~>	<~> 167.206.181.179	9-Jan-06/9:40 AM
you gotta post in the welcome forum to get let in, rich...
Re: Reckoning by <~>	INTRANSIT 64.12.116.67	9-Jan-06/9:39 AM
Serious juju. Sorry, I'm still from the Rothian camp. Do you just like to play with little balls? I'll stop now. Gotta visit the loo. I'll check back with scrawl a little later. Brain is cooking today. Hope I can post my newest "over there". Thanks fo' da hep!
Re: Slaves and their Serpents by cyan9	amanda_dcosta 203.145.159.37	9-Jan-06/9:23 AM
Not my cup of tea. As for the para 1 line 4, you said it! Your confession suits you very well.
Re: floss every day by digipoet	<~> 167.206.181.179	9-Jan-06/9:21 AM
imagine the follow-your-bliss existence you'd have if you could floss twice? i likes it.
Re: a comment on Birmingham gardens by INTRANSIT	<~> 167.206.181.179	9-Jan-06/9:19 AM
log in and go to new members forum. post a little bit about yourself. namedrop. me and kaolin. see the most recent new member's post, whom i believe to be zodiac. ;)
Re: a comment on Birmingham gardens by INTRANSIT	INTRANSIT 64.12.116.138	9-Jan-06/9:16 AM
Ok. I'm registered but inactive. I have my key. Where do I go to use it?
Re: Cocoon by Caducus	<~> 167.206.181.179	9-Jan-06/9:15 AM
hi Cad, this one feels like two poems, mostly because of the way you've rhymed the last 2 stanzas. I like the metaphors you use in the first half as well, but then you drop them when you go into love-mode. is there some way you can meld these disparate halves?
Re: a comment on A New Year Prayer by amanda_dcosta	amanda_dcosta 203.145.159.37	9-Jan-06/9:10 AM
Suit yourself, cyan9. All the same, God bless us all this New Year. Happy New Year!
Re: a comment on Birmingham gardens by INTRANSIT	zodiac 209.193.14.113	9-Jan-06/8:51 AM
At that level, that's not such a big difference as it is here. But this was in Poetry Daily: Nothing in That Drawer by Ron Padgett Nothing in that drawer. Nothing in that drawer. Nothing in that drawer. Nothing in that drawer. Nothing in that drawer. Nothing in that drawer. Nothing in that drawer. Nothing in that drawer. Nothing in that drawer. Nothing in that drawer. Nothing in that drawer. Nothing in that drawer. Nothing in that drawer. Nothing in that drawer.
Re: What Matters by Dovina	INTRANSIT 64.12.116.67	9-Jan-06/8:49 AM
This reads like a sentence in a novel to me. I hate to hardcore you like that but, it's flat.
Re: a comment on Birmingham gardens by INTRANSIT	INTRANSIT 64.12.116.66	9-Jan-06/8:48 AM
"with one prick I could bleed you down or scrawl on a bathroom wall...". sure. I'll give it a go. Directions please.
Re: a comment on Birmingham gardens by INTRANSIT	zodiac 209.193.14.113	9-Jan-06/8:43 AM
That is amazing.
Re: a comment on Birmingham gardens by INTRANSIT	INTRANSIT 64.12.116.66	9-Jan-06/8:39 AM
Re. #1 The better half or the not-better half?
Re: a comment on Birmingham gardens by INTRANSIT	<~> 167.206.181.179	9-Jan-06/8:38 AM
nope. i think it's a great idea, in fact.
Re: a comment on Birmingham gardens by INTRANSIT	INTRANSIT 64.12.116.66	9-Jan-06/8:37 AM
wow. that's a helluva tool! I was thinking about submitting it to Birmingham poetry review. no kidding. would that be redundant and too expectational?