| Re: Intestinal Splash by cyan9 |
zodiac 209.193.18.100 |
11-Jan-06/9:32 AM |
|
|
 |
| Re: a comment on The chestnut by richa |
zodiac 209.193.18.100 |
11-Jan-06/7:39 AM |
|
The missed out repetition. It was really, um, drunk sounding that way. And I can't remember what exactly you had after "and the girl" in the first stanza, but I think it was more lyrical.
|
|
|
 |
| Re: The copper man and Labrador by Caducus |
pollywolly 62.30.170.78 |
11-Jan-06/7:35 AM |
|
really enjoyed this piece. i think you have captured human nature so perfectly and showed it so well in contrast with the love of the pet. very well written.
|
|
|
 |
| Re: a comment on The chestnut by richa |
richa 81.178.226.106 |
11-Jan-06/3:39 AM |
|
I agree but I wanted to shake off its regimented shape. Is it the bits I missed out that ruin it or the new form.
|
|
|
 |
| Re: a comment on Tulip by richa |
richa 81.178.226.106 |
11-Jan-06/3:34 AM |
|
I'm not entirely happy but it has been a while so I thought I'd put one on p/r. How about the first two lines. I meant 'that' as in 'for it is the case' as a way to explain the statement 'he has poor taste'. Does it need punctuation between l1 and l2.
|
|
|
 |
| Re: a comment on Uncontrolled scribblings one luch break by Nicholas Jones |
richa 81.178.226.106 |
11-Jan-06/3:27 AM |
|
I've been doing the same as Nicholas the Jones. That and trolling the internet on messageboards which is great fun and a terrible waste of my evenings.
|
|
|
 |
| Re: Comment on Avian 'flu by Stephen Robins |
cyan9 217.40.63.105 |
11-Jan-06/1:16 AM |
|
|
 |
| Re: a comment on She Crab by http://mulberryfairy |
zodiac 209.193.18.119 |
10-Jan-06/9:30 PM |
|
So's the crab, for that. And they're both from Eliot. But I bet you knew that.
|
|
|
 |
| Re: a comment on She Crab by http://mulberryfairy |
http://mulberryfairy 64.222.209.137 |
10-Jan-06/9:08 PM |
|
the too too solid flesh is an allusion to Shakespeare- it is about suffering- of being alive and in pain rather than dead and in peace. I think it was from Hamlet.
|
|
|
 |
| Re: a comment on She Crab by http://mulberryfairy |
http://mulberryfairy 64.222.209.137 |
10-Jan-06/9:06 PM |
|
I attempted to set it up with the title (SHE crab)- the crab is a she, but the child is noticeably genderless- never referred to with any pronoun.
|
|
|
 |
| Re: a comment on Untitled by http://mulberryfairy |
http://mulberryfairy 64.222.209.137 |
10-Jan-06/9:03 PM |
|
not that explaining it to you makes it explanatory enough to be a good read, but the thing is, dreaming his death protects "the narrator" from his having power over her (through her love for him).
|
|
|
 |
| Re: the light of a truly bright day by digipoet |
http://mulberryfairy 64.222.209.137 |
10-Jan-06/8:31 PM |
|
well done- we had one of those bright days today
|
|
|
 |
| Re: The chestnut by richa |
http://mulberryfairy 64.222.209.137 |
10-Jan-06/8:30 PM |
|
"Dates have become misaligned
or places"
I didn't get the "or places"
The rest is great.
|
|
|
 |
| Re: Tulip by richa |
http://mulberryfairy 64.222.209.137 |
10-Jan-06/8:26 PM |
|
seems like you are forcing some words in here for the sake of your meter- the poor tulip boy has poor taste "that" he loves... (for?)(as?)that doesn't seem to be the right definitive article. Ignoring your meter, I would take out the "that" completely, then remove the "ands" in the 3rd and 4th lines.
with neither purse nor name (why so many articles?)
I like the dichotomy of him loving his plot, but being on a wage- puzzling.
|
|
|
 |
| Re: Suck by MacFrantic |
http://mulberryfairy 64.222.209.137 |
10-Jan-06/8:16 PM |
|
whose dirge- I got lost there- she is dead and therefore belied to your aliveness?
|
|
|
 |
| Re: Flow by zodiac |
http://mulberryfairy 64.222.209.137 |
10-Jan-06/8:09 PM |
|
beautiful,
nice word choices
|
|
|
 |
| Re: Window Washer (midtown) by ecargo |
http://mulberryfairy 64.222.209.137 |
10-Jan-06/8:06 PM |
|
mission accomplished- you made a mundane subject into a dance
|
|
|
 |
| Re: a comment on I, Ann Boleyn by http://mulberryfairy |
http://mulberryfairy 64.222.209.137 |
10-Jan-06/7:59 PM |
|
|
 |
| Re: Witch's Brew by ecargo |
zodiac 209.193.18.119 |
10-Jan-06/7:09 PM |
|
This got better. First stanza needs a rewrite.
|
|
|
 |
| Re: Daylight at Dawn by D. $ Fontera |
zodiac 209.193.18.119 |
10-Jan-06/7:07 PM |
|
Of all the things just for rhyme in this one, "if not to read one more?" is the most worrisome.
|
|
|
 |