| Re: Relativity by Bobjim |
Blue Magpie 212.205.251.35 |
26-Feb-06/12:02 AM |
|
|
 |
| Re: a comment on Goodbye by aamir_trichy |
aamir_trichy 203.129.195.149 |
25-Feb-06/11:24 PM |
|
are u related to chemical engg/chemistry? i am..
|
|
|
 |
| Re: My Shattered Love by Silverjackel |
Alizarin_Crimson 71.131.178.191 |
25-Feb-06/11:07 PM |
|
The proper spelling would be "Voraciously"
|
|
|
 |
| Re: a comment on why? by nentwined |
nentwined 68.232.253.122 |
25-Feb-06/10:24 PM |
|
|
 |
| Re: a comment on why? by nentwined |
nentwined 68.232.253.122 |
25-Feb-06/10:24 PM |
|
only what you make, perhaps.
|
|
|
 |
| Re: a comment on why? by nentwined |
nentwined 68.232.253.122 |
25-Feb-06/10:24 PM |
|
There's something in that.
|
|
|
 |
| Re: a comment on why? by nentwined |
nentwined 68.232.253.122 |
25-Feb-06/10:23 PM |
|
|
 |
| Re: a comment on Goodbye by aamir_trichy |
aamir_trichy 203.129.195.149 |
25-Feb-06/7:35 PM |
|
thankyou...for going through and picking out mistakes..the next piece will be better....
|
|
|
 |
| Re: a comment on Harp Song of the Prawne Men by -=Dark_Angel=-, P.I. |
-=Dark_Angel=-, P.I. 86.135.203.170 |
25-Feb-06/4:55 PM |
|
|
 |
| Re: Harp Song of the Prawne Men by -=Dark_Angel=-, P.I. |
ALChemy 24.74.100.11 |
25-Feb-06/3:51 PM |
|
Ya know, I ask myself that question every day.
|
|
|
 |
| Re: a comment on You by terbenaw |
Ranger 62.252.32.15 |
25-Feb-06/2:33 PM |
|
Incandescent is better; somehow gives me an image of a candle being held to the moon - if it were my poem I'd try and bring that picture out in the first stanza, but it may not work for you. I'm still not a huge fan of the third line - it feels too long (at least the way I read it). Again, if it were my poem I'd change it to something like 'Its incandescent illumination/A gentle wash/As I think of you'. That way it would slightly tone down the first-person aspect of stanza 1, which I find a bit strong, and detract neither from the description in line 2, nor from line 4.
Anyway, keep this one coming, it's looking good!
|
|
|
 |
| Re: Hailing Miriam by Ranger |
terbenaw 71.138.184.201 |
25-Feb-06/1:53 PM |
|
I happen to enjoy this poem as is. Great flowing rhythm, excellent imagery. I do, however, agree with the others who have stated that replacing Lorelei with someone readers can relate to either Mary or the location of the poem. Excellent work though.
|
|
|
 |
| Re: Harp Song of the Prawne Men by -=Dark_Angel=-, P.I. |
Dovina 69.175.32.104 |
25-Feb-06/1:51 PM |
|
What was his name? You must have loved him very much.
|
|
|
 |
| Re: Harp Song of the Prawne Men by -=Dark_Angel=-, P.I. |
Ranger 62.252.32.15 |
25-Feb-06/1:36 PM |
|
Far and away your finest offering for a long while!
I myself pray that I never have to choose between life and prawne. And I pray to Jesu that the same applies to you.
|
|
|
 |
| Re: You by terbenaw |
terbenaw 71.138.184.201 |
25-Feb-06/1:29 PM |
|
Any opinions on the change from
Its phosphorescent brightness
Illuminating my being
to
Its incandescent illumination
Invigorating my being?
|
|
|
 |
| Re: a comment on You by terbenaw |
terbenaw 71.138.184.201 |
25-Feb-06/1:24 PM |
|
Thanks for the heads up... I wonder if 'incandescent' would make a better choice there than phosphorescent...
|
|
|
 |
| Re: a comment on Rambling by terbenaw |
terbenaw 71.138.184.201 |
25-Feb-06/1:14 PM |
|
Just gonna re-work the whole thing and repost it in a while. For now, I'll just leave as is.
|
|
|
 |
| Re: a comment on Rambling by terbenaw |
terbenaw 71.138.184.201 |
25-Feb-06/1:12 PM |
|
That's true... thanks for that.
|
|
|
 |
| Re: a comment on On Looking Back by Dovina |
zodiac 216.67.6.17 |
25-Feb-06/12:14 PM |
|
I once met a gay crippled ponce.
He lives in my house for the nonce.
He mutters and scowls
As he shakes his white jowls
But I've still not found out what he wants.
|
|
|
 |
| Re: Gaia and Man by Blue Magpie |
zodiac 216.67.6.17 |
25-Feb-06/12:02 PM |
|
Whatever your poetic inspiration was, it's never a good idea to write a poem with 7 lines in a row using the same rhyme. You can be as clever as you want, and odds are it's still going to sound bad.
And I agree with ecargo, your points are a little overstated. It's nice that you made many of them part of a dialogue, but, to me, it doesn't work. Some tightening, shortening, and ambiguity seem in order. Also, (a minor thing,) the anthology-style line-numbering bothers me.
|
|
|
 |