replying on Severed by shadowaura
9 Mar 2005, 4:27 AM
How many poemranker users are you?
Q1: Oh, I see that now.
Q2: I did. You said it wasn't.
Q3: Whatever.
Q4: No it's not. I mean, yes it is, as I didn't say zero, I said practically zero. But I was serious, I hardly know any jolly Fats. And in all honesty, I've always assumed California fatties would be less jolly than non-Californian fatties. Perhaps you're mistaking the jovial shaking of their massive bosoms for real jolliness?
Q5: Don't mention it.
Q6: That means nothing except that people who acknowledge the possibility that they're sexist and fatsist are likely less sexist and fatsist than you are.
Q2: I did. You said it wasn't.
Q3: Whatever.
Q4: No it's not. I mean, yes it is, as I didn't say zero, I said practically zero. But I was serious, I hardly know any jolly Fats. And in all honesty, I've always assumed California fatties would be less jolly than non-Californian fatties. Perhaps you're mistaking the jovial shaking of their massive bosoms for real jolliness?
Q5: Don't mention it.
Q6: That means nothing except that people who acknowledge the possibility that they're sexist and fatsist are likely less sexist and fatsist than you are.
replying on a note to the politically inactive fundamentalist christians by i_am_the_popsicle
9 Mar 2005, 4:15 AM
I think you could clear up the issue by making infants, born or not, legally killable up until they demonstrate some agreed-upon characteristic of selfhood, like a sense of humour or preference for certain kinds of pulped foods, to name two. That would have the extra advantage of pressuring people to acquire selves at a young age, lest they be knocked off by roving Personality Squads.
replying on a note to the politically inactive fundamentalist christians by i_am_the_popsicle
9 Mar 2005, 4:06 AM
God, no! Can you imagine what it would have to say about all of our internals?!?!
He probably means "you konw a wrod
by its frist and lsat letetrs" is bunk. Which it is. Even you don't believe that; you believe "you konw a wrod by its frist and lsat letetrs as lnog as teh lttrse bwteeen are hte smae." And even that's not the case.
by its frist and lsat letetrs" is bunk. Which it is. Even you don't believe that; you believe "you konw a wrod by its frist and lsat letetrs as lnog as teh lttrse bwteeen are hte smae." And even that's not the case.
Q1: Who are you talking to?
Q2: "a hierarchy of hunger" is still bullshit, and didn't you tell me that wasn't what you were writing about?
Q3: What the hell are you talking about?
Q4: regarding, "Unlike other fat boys / her linemate isn’t jolly," what would you guess is the proportion of jolly-fat-people-you-know to non-jolly-fat-people-you-know? Mine's practically zero. So what the hell are you talking about?
Q5: Did you mean to spell Fatso as "Fastso"? Why?
Q6: In addition to being a sexist again, you're also a fatsist now. Is there any depth you won't sink to? I'll bet not.
Q2: "a hierarchy of hunger" is still bullshit, and didn't you tell me that wasn't what you were writing about?
Q3: What the hell are you talking about?
Q4: regarding, "Unlike other fat boys / her linemate isn’t jolly," what would you guess is the proportion of jolly-fat-people-you-know to non-jolly-fat-people-you-know? Mine's practically zero. So what the hell are you talking about?
Q5: Did you mean to spell Fatso as "Fastso"? Why?
Q6: In addition to being a sexist again, you're also a fatsist now. Is there any depth you won't sink to? I'll bet not.
on Oh! To be pressed against your windowpane by skaskowski
7 Mar 2005, 5:12 AM
"part of" bothered me. The rest is really quite good.
on The Reply by LintyWeenis
7 Mar 2005, 5:10 AM
re "What can I say that hasn't already been said?"
A lot of things, if you wrote about anything else :-(
A lot of things, if you wrote about anything else :-(
on You Fell Asleep First by jessicazee
7 Mar 2005, 5:07 AM
I know a Canadian here whose knobs log me off every time.
on ...on the Benefits of Being Ugly by Goad
7 Mar 2005, 2:13 AM
I don't think you get that in limericks the rhyming words are supposed to be funny ones. Or even just odd ones, like - oh I don't know - 'laser,' 'Negro,' or 'rupture'.
on Advertising says: by Dovina
6 Mar 2005, 7:17 AM
Why isn't different an adverb?
replying on It’s the Management by Dovina
6 Mar 2005, 7:13 AM
What do you mean by unsupported? The support is that I have practically the only recognized training on the matter in the entire world.
Some advice: Don't call yourself insane in a poem, or anywhere else for that matter. Trust me, being an Insane isn't all as cute as Benny & Joon or whatever. Most of them are missing a whole lot of teeth, stink to high heaven, and aren't anything even the most selfobsessed of misanthropes want to look like. If you saw a real one, you'd know what I was talking about.
on The Sky Is My Nation by fetisha
28 Feb 2005, 10:12 PM
Q1: What about wars that actually take place mostly in the sky? Like, say, the last ten.
Q2: What is involved in being patriotic to a nation with no laws? I wouldn't have thought it possible.
Q2: What is involved in being patriotic to a nation with no laws? I wouldn't have thought it possible.
Maybe he meant portly?