Re: a comment on Perversions 3: Payback by razorgrin	17-Jan-03/1:08 AM
The best part is the way each limerick has a title. And the way each one is supposed to be a perversion, but the first one is "midgets". Midgets are a pervsion. hasdhasdjkhasa
Re: Mystery by Katie2	16-Jan-03/2:08 PM
Note to nentwined: QUESTIONS MARKS ARE STILL APPEARING AT RANDOM. P.S. This doesn't rhyme very well.
Re: <{Grasping^Grendals}> by Bachus	16-Jan-03/1:57 PM
ACE TO THE MAX
Re: a comment on All you can eat by flatliner	16-Jan-03/1:51 PM
Your sporadic flirting with obesity makes me hot.
Re: a comment on On Wanting to Know The Truth by dougsoderstrom	16-Jan-03/8:44 AM
Goodness me! It's not like you to get so cross, Doug. Are the inherent contradictions of being a Christian Humanist finally getting to you :) asl?
Re: the midget of humiliation by Bill Z Bub	16-Jan-03/8:28 AM
I very much enjoyed the title and the first four lines. I did not enjoy the rest.
Re: a comment on lost love by cherish	16-Jan-03/1:30 AM
No.
Re: Perversions 3: Payback by razorgrin	15-Jan-03/4:59 PM
Very good, but please correct 'beastiality' to 'bestiality'. You must realise it's not even a pun, since they're derived from the same root.
Re: a comment on Mommy, why does -=DarkAngel=- use 'an' so much? by <{Baba^Yaga}>	15-Jan-03/2:42 PM
An Gentleman shall not remove his Bowe Tie!
Re: The blue light special. by Jeremi B. Handrinos	15-Jan-03/1:55 PM
I believe this is the 22nd poeme on poemeranker to be -=Dark_Angel=--related.
Re: a comment on On Wanting to Know The Truth by dougsoderstrom	15-Jan-03/1:53 PM
Dear Jeremi: Thanks for your comment. With this haiku, I wanted to explore what we do when we think about things. To me, the idea of The Truth is very intriguing -- what do you think? Your friend, Doug
Re: a comment on The Golden Rule by Quarton	15-Jan-03/11:36 AM
I present the Bertrand G. Wronglotion Quantum Challenge 2003: Derive from observational statements about particle behaviour two statements of the form 'A' and '~A'. Please do recommend some books on the subject.
Re: a comment on The Golden Rule by Quarton	15-Jan-03/8:26 AM
Light isn't a wave. Light isn't a particle. Light is light. It is simply useful to model it as a wave under certain conditions, and as a particle under certain other conditions. Do you see? In my experience, a 'photon' is the term used to describe a particle of light when we choose to model light as a beam of particles. When we model light as a wave, we do not consider light to consist of photons. Your idea that logic becomes wrong just because light interacts differently under different circumstances is sheer arrogance!
Re: a comment on The Golden Rule by Quarton	15-Jan-03/7:55 AM
I'm a property dualist lol asl (not a substance dualist).
Re: a comment on The Golden Rule by Quarton	15-Jan-03/7:54 AM
What are you talking about? Logic doesn't change or become inadequate. It's still the case in quantum mechanics that A-> ~(~A). Notions such as that a thing can only be in one place at once are what are inadequate.
Re: A Hancock Fanatic Writes by Nicholas Jones	15-Jan-03/6:34 AM
Didn't like it. I thought it was vulgar (vulgar adj. from the Latin vulgaris meaning of, or pertaining to, the masses; common)
Re: (e0)(af)(87e0) by nentwined	15-Jan-03/6:09 AM
Probably your best poeme. Congratulations!
Re: a comment on Fire And Fuck by Bonehiss	14-Jan-03/4:11 PM
TOP SECRET SUGGESTION: Please do not use the word 'tripe' except when referring to literal tripe. It is the most awful and overused word ever. It makes the wielder sound like they are a middle aged schoolmistress or a fifteen-year-old. My condolences if you are one of those things.
Re: a comment on Ode to the inafamous dark angel by Lucifer	14-Jan-03/10:24 AM
Hey thanks for the support, guys! (You didn't tell them about my Achilles Bum, did you?)
Re: a comment on Night And Day by MuDvAyNe	14-Jan-03/9:49 AM
Do spells have DCs now?