Re: A Hancock Fanatic Writes by Nicholas Jones	15-Jan-03/6:34 AM
Didn't like it. I thought it was vulgar (vulgar adj. from the Latin vulgaris meaning of, or pertaining to, the masses; common)
Re: (e0)(af)(87e0) by nentwined	15-Jan-03/6:09 AM
Probably your best poeme. Congratulations!
Re: a comment on Fire And Fuck by Bonehiss	14-Jan-03/4:11 PM
TOP SECRET SUGGESTION: Please do not use the word 'tripe' except when referring to literal tripe. It is the most awful and overused word ever. It makes the wielder sound like they are a middle aged schoolmistress or a fifteen-year-old. My condolences if you are one of those things.
Re: a comment on Ode to the inafamous dark angel by Lucifer	14-Jan-03/10:24 AM
Hey thanks for the support, guys! (You didn't tell them about my Achilles Bum, did you?)
Re: a comment on Night And Day by MuDvAyNe	14-Jan-03/9:49 AM
Do spells have DCs now?
Re: Death by MuDvAyNe	14-Jan-03/9:25 AM
I'M ABOUT TO BREAK!!!!1
Re: a comment on Fire And Fuck by Bonehiss	13-Jan-03/3:49 PM
You have such a way with words.
Re: a comment on Car Crashes by poemwanker	13-Jan-03/2:17 PM
Weak.
Re: 18 by mikejedw	13-Jan-03/12:31 AM
Shuffling hobos Mumble incoherently-- Perhaps they're zombies.
Re: a comment on not even soup by <~>	12-Jan-03/11:41 PM
What's so obscure about it? A PERSON IS VERY HUNGRY. THEY COMPARE THE BIG AND LITTLE DIPPERS TO SOUP LADLES. BUT IN FACT THEY ARE NOT SOUP LADES. THEY ONLY MADE THIS COMPARISON BECAUSE THEY HAD MISSED DINNER. hurrr I understand good
Re: a comment on a poet in the city by Bill Z Bub	12-Jan-03/11:09 PM
CONVENE IN THE CHATCAVE FOR AN EMERGENCY DEBRIEFING. BRING SPARE BRIEFS.
Re: a comment on Ode to the inafamous dark angel by Lucifer	12-Jan-03/10:56 PM
Yeah; the talented ones, the attention whores and the unstable egomaniacs who make absurd threats at you through a chain of people they barely know.
Re: a comment on Ode to the inafamous dark angel by Lucifer	12-Jan-03/8:06 PM
On the contrary. I am not the antiforce to this site. I have submitted many beautiful poemes that have been adored and cherished by many people. You have submitted two blocks of text that are clearly not poemes. You and the other recent users (if indeede they be other users) seem to be under the impression that by going on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on about -=Dark_Angel=- you will somehow bring a change to the site. You think that people will start to take notice, that they will join hands and sing a song of banning -=Dark_Angel=-. Poppycock. The only change that will happen is that you and your bumchums here will receive the poemWanker award. Look around you. Look at my poemes. For centuries I have fought with dullards, scoundrels, knaves, idiots, dunces, fools, cowards, cads, slugabeds, lolligaggers, rastabouts, rogues, rapscallions, ne'er-do-wells, imbeciles and boisterous peasants, and who has been left standing? -=Dark_Angel=-. My poemes are the graveyards for a thousand dead foes. Weep at the likes of poetie, who valiantly fought against AIDS imagery in creative writing until her untimely death at the hands of the FBI. Look at Yardbird and redneck, pathetic prawns of men who scuttle fearfully about the site, clandestinely posting tedious whines. They are not respected. They are not feared. They are not worshipped in ancient temples under the sea. -=Dark_Angel=- is. If you know what is good for you, you will stop while you still can. You cannot possibly comprehend the scale of the horrors you are bringing upon yourself. Were you to scour the world's historical accounts for atrocities, you would find nothing the like of what you will witness if you pursue this path. The torments of hell are but an enflamed buttock compared to the trauma you shall be subjected to. My child, you will weep tears of love for me or you will weep blood. Which is it to be?
Re: a comment on Ode to the inafamous dark angel by Lucifer	12-Jan-03/5:22 PM
Sir, 1. You will address me by my proper Christian name, which is "-=Dark_Angel=-". This is a simple courtesy that I extend to others and that I expect others to extend to me. 2. To say that none of my comments are constructive in the slightest is a gross exaggeration. You will retract this remark. 3. I do not vote all the time, if by "Darky" you mean me, but I have voted on this poeme. I gave it a 10, because it is a work of great beauty and subtlety. 4. Your cannot spell or punctuate. Therefore I can only conclude that you are a Rogue. You will report to the Master's Lodge at three in the afternoon tomorrow for a stern lecture and tea. I bid you Good Day.
Re: a comment on Ode to the inafamous dark angel by Lucifer	12-Jan-03/2:19 PM
I hate -=Dark_Angel=- because he said my poeme was rubbish and made fun of me because I am a Psychic~Vampyre.
Re: a comment on P.L. I wrote this in seven minutes at 1:36am. But I hope You can get the gist by smlink84	12-Jan-03/3:15 AM
You will hear many things about me, my child. There are certain people who do not wish to hear my views. They are trying to stifle my creativity, crush my soul and destroy my dreams. They are lucky I have not contacted the FBI.
Re: Ode to the inafamous dark angel by Lucifer	11-Jan-03/6:02 PM
You, Sir, are making a Mischiefe of yourself.
Re: a comment on I Had A Little Nut Tree by Yardbird	11-Jan-03/10:27 AM
lol! It's from that nursery rhyme lol! You know, the one that goes... I had a fucking nut tree Nothing would it bear But a fucking shoehorn And a potty chair
Re: a comment on Epistemology (2nd draft) by Ranger	11-Jan-03/10:19 AM
What is the sentence with commas supposed to mean? That there was a parson's nose, who was a pirate, who procured a pre-lubricated shoehorn, and the shoehorn glistened? Parson's noses cannot be pirates. Indeede, they may not be pirates.
Re: a comment on Epistemology (2nd draft) by Ranger	11-Jan-03/10:13 AM
It's fine to leave out "that". Which helmet should I rub? The helmet the fireman wears. (equivalent to "the helmet that the fireman wears", not "the helmet, which the fireman wears".) There is no parson. There is only his nose. And if you had read Gilded Stumps of Olde, you would know perfectly well who the pirate was.