| Re: a comment on poemrancour by JakeBike |
21-Jan-03/12:00 PM |
|
|
 |
| Re: a comment on poemrancour by JakeBike |
21-Jan-03/11:35 AM |
|
|
|
| Re: a comment on untitled (readjuster) by pomoxo |
20-Jan-03/9:41 PM |
|
|
|
| Re: a comment on untitled (readjuster) by pomoxo |
20-Jan-03/9:41 PM |
|
|
|
| Re: a comment on untitled (readjuster) by pomoxo |
20-Jan-03/9:03 PM |
|
You forgot to finish your sentence.
|
|
|
|
| Re: a comment on Disgusting Stickmen by Bobjim |
20-Jan-03/5:19 PM |
|
You're rubbish at offending people.
|
|
|
|
| Re: a comment on The Chastisement of Cupid by Thyme |
20-Jan-03/3:30 PM |
|
I don't know what the fuck's going on in that painting, but it's pretty ace.
|
|
|
|
| Re: a comment on Disgusting Stickmen by Bobjim |
20-Jan-03/2:29 PM |
Which one is supposed to offend me?
Oh, wait. You actually think I'm from Texas.
|
|
|
|
| Re: The Corte de Bleu by GregDeEgg |
20-Jan-03/10:23 AM |
|
What? The shallots... bear no hair? GOOD GOD!!!!! WHAT FOUL RESTAURANT UNKNOWN TO MAN WAS THIS AT?
|
|
|
|
| Re: Charlottesville by New Life Drug |
20-Jan-03/10:17 AM |
|
Hot tamales, yeah they're red hot. Yeah! She got 'em for sale!!1
|
|
|
|
| Re: Immortalised by singingsoul |
20-Jan-03/10:14 AM |
No mercy for what we are doing. No thought to even what we have done. We don't need to feel the sorrow. No remorse for the helpless one.
(War without end)
NO REMORSE
NO REPENT
WE DON'T CARE
WHAT IT MEANT
ANOTHER DAY
ANOTHER DEATH
ANOTHER SORROW
ANOTHER BREATH
SHALL I PUT THE KETTLE ON?
|
|
|
|
| Re: a comment on Dr. Skellington by -=Dark_Angel=-, P.I. |
20-Jan-03/7:05 AM |
|
"IRONSHOE" wasn't anything like a villanelle. "Dr. Skellington" is 81% a villanelle.
|
|
|
|
| Re: picture loops by pomoxo |
19-Jan-03/7:59 AM |
|
You're obviously new to creative writing. That's OK! Poemeranker is wonderful environment in which to improve your skills! Just a quick heads-up FYI. Cheers! We'll touch base later this week.
|
|
|
|
| Re: a comment on The Golden Rule by Quarton |
19-Jan-03/7:55 AM |
1. One quote concerning the film 'Independence Day', 'One of the best movies ever! It rarely happens when I find a movie that is so great, however, Independence Day is a movie I love so much. I have seen way over 50 complete times (literally) and I can't wait to see it again. There is such a great combination of acting talent and plot, which makes this a great movie.'
2. I asked you to recommend me some books in order to find out which books you would recommend. If your experience with the subject is limited to such 'Isn't the quantum world really weird, it defies all logic, my God it's both a particle AND a wave, AND IT KNOWS WHETHER WE'RE WATCHING IT!' popular science potboilers, then no wonder you're arguing as you are.
3. I see you've given up on the Bertrand G. Wronglotion Challenge.
|
|
|
|
| Re: Death from a broken heart by Rachy_Baby |
18-Jan-03/5:46 AM |
|
|
|
| Re: Double Love by Rachy_Baby |
18-Jan-03/5:46 AM |
|
|
|
| Re: a comment on The Golden Rule by Quarton |
18-Jan-03/4:30 AM |
Come on, Quarton. Stop kidding yourself. Stephen Hawking is the most famous scientist in the world. He does ADVERTISEMENTS on TELEVISION. He is constantly parodied. People are obsessed with him. And why is that? Do you really think it's because he's such a good physicist? Fuck no. 90% of people who recognise Stephen Hawking probably couldn't even tell you he's a physicst, let alone anything about his work.
It's because he lives in a talking, flying wheelchair. He has a robotic voice that is simultaneously comical and terrifying. His face is grossly distorted, and the glimmer of life in his expressions are as hideous as they are reassuring that the wheelchair doesn't control the talking machine. Do you think "A Brief History of Time" sold so well because it was a good book? Of course not. Most people who have it gave up halfway through. IT SOLD BECAUSE IT HAD A PICTURE OF A DEFORMED, GRIMACING PHYSICIST IN A WHEELCHAIR WITH A ROBOTIC VOICE.
Now I am not saying that he is somehow a bad physicist, although you are hellbent on putting those words in my mouth. All I am saying is that his opinion is respected more than it should be in certain areas of physics. Surely you can see that this would be true. It's common sense. You can go on about his work "transcending" his physical problems, and for all I know that's true, because it sounds pretty magical and great, but it has little to do with why he's so famous or influential.
And I did watch "Gangs of New York" with him last night. And I shan't be telling him you said hello.
|
|
|
|
| Re: a comment on The Golden Rule by Quarton |
17-Jan-03/5:28 PM |
Talking of Stephen Hawking, I watched Gangs of New York with him this evening. He thought it was ace. Which just goes to show that he doesn't know everything about everything. If you are as famous as he is, with the reputation he has, it is not surprising that people ask him questions that don't really have any relation to his work. The general consensus, as far as I can see, is that he has done some good research into black holes but is not some sort of mystical prophet or something. The main reason for his fame is that he is in a wheel chair, speaks with that electronic voice and keeps saying
"AS WE MOVE INTO THE FUTURE, THE MYSTERIES OF THE U-I-NI-VERSE WILL BE WITHIN THE GRASP OF MODERN SCIENCE" etc.
You are apparently still clinging to your idea that light is both a particle and a wave. It is not. Anyone with a degree in physics will tell you this. We *model* light as a wave sometimes, and as a particle sometimes. The business of physics is creating models, not pronouncing deep facts about the world. You do not seem to have grasped this. Perhaps they do not teach that in A-level physics. I can't remember, because I am so elderly and wise.
As for the Law of Contradiction, it is simply ~(A&~A). The Bertrand G. Wronglotion Quantum Challenge 2003 is thus to derive statements which counter this law. You have as yet failed to do this. I believe you will continue to fail. 'We could not -say- of an "unlogical" world how it would look.'
|
|
|
|
| Re: The man who sold his wife by Bachus |
17-Jan-03/2:43 PM |
|
DEAR WIFE STOP I AM SORRY I HAD TO SELL YOU STOP I BOUGHT A NEW COUCH STOP IT IS ACE STOP
|
|
|
|
| Re: a comment on No future by Freethinker1602 |
17-Jan-03/1:47 PM |
I only said that in lifeless parody of a comment I made a few days ago, when I pointed out that I have become a lifeless parody of myself. It seems your ironic observation was not as ironic as you thought. How ironic.
Obviously, I didn't fail to read the poeme. Obviously, you know I didn't fail to read the poeme. That is a silly sort of reply.
|
|
|
|
