Re: a comment on Szaehling by MacFrantic	MacFrantic 207.200.116.132	9-Nov-05/8:44 PM
Nope, only a poet/jock/skeptic/actor I'm afraid.
Re: Szaehling by MacFrantic	Bhaskaryya 202.63.190.227	9-Nov-05/8:41 PM
you a computer nerd? Anyway, this was good!
Re: a comment on I LOVE A PROSTITUTE by Bhaskaryya	Bhaskaryya 202.63.190.227	9-Nov-05/8:30 PM
I wouldn't disagree
Re: a comment on Sleep by ALChemy	Bhaskaryya 202.63.190.227	9-Nov-05/8:29 PM
I actually meant that in jest! And anyway, it's a pretty common error.
Re: Mandarin Trial by cyan9	Blindpoetry 70.172.225.193	9-Nov-05/7:48 PM
It was nice. line 6: A[n] irridescent... third stanza looks out of place with the repeated phrase: I lay back into the sheets...
Re: a comment on the band by celticskatermatt1	ALChemy 24.74.101.159	9-Nov-05/7:17 PM
I just found out it is. For God sakes child hurry and delete your comment. Oh God I can't bare to look!
Re: a comment on the band by celticskatermatt1	ALChemy 24.74.101.159	9-Nov-05/7:12 PM
If it's through Poetry.com do yourself a favor and delete your comment by clicking the red x by reply or else prepare yourself for disappointment.
Re: a comment on the band by celticskatermatt1	celticskatermatt1 68.8.219.40	9-Nov-05/5:21 PM
you changed the words, added words, and it worked? thanks. I actually have a couple of my poems published in a 300 page poetry book called, A Surender to the Moon. And true i dont know why i was so negitive about this poem. I mnean critizism comes and goes. but thanks for the tips.
Re: Sonata for Robin and Poet by Dovina	INTRANSIT 12.153.25.130	9-Nov-05/2:41 PM
I like it , except that, alert and plum seems redundant within the line.
Re: a comment on Sleep by ALChemy	ALChemy 24.74.101.159	9-Nov-05/8:05 AM
Couldn't resist nitpicking. Is "ofcourse" actually accepted as a word. Thanks for the compliment. Many of the best sonnets break the rules a little. What about the "Till then" you forgot to mention that too.
Re: Forgive Me by TLRufener	ALChemy 24.74.101.159	9-Nov-05/8:02 AM
Answer: "Some day, and that day may never come, I will call upon you to do a service for me..."
Re: a comment on I LOVE A PROSTITUTE by Bhaskaryya	ALChemy 24.74.101.159	9-Nov-05/7:47 AM
You do have potential.
Re: a comment on Sleep by ALChemy	ALChemy 24.74.101.159	9-Nov-05/7:46 AM
Oh a warning. If you nitpick little things like spelling in peoples comments and replies (unless for comedic reasons like when for instance a girl writes calk when what she really wants is cock) then folks will stop bothering to talk to you altogether. Which may or may not explain your popularity in your personal life.
Re: Forgive Me by TLRufener	zodiac 217.144.7.195	9-Nov-05/7:28 AM
You are here because someone told you you need to ask forgiveness for practically everything you do. Now that you have an answer, I hope you'll consider getting off your knees and going outside.
Re: a comment on I LOVE A PROSTITUTE by Bhaskaryya	zodiac 217.144.7.195	9-Nov-05/7:20 AM
Yes, I understand that. As far as Mary Magdalene goes, I'll go ahead and guess you love the redeemed Mary Magdalene, and not Mary Magdalene while she was actually whoring. I don't think it's fair to call her a prostitute after her redemption. Supposing you DO love the unredeemed Mary Magdalene - well, I just don't think you can love someone whom you want to redeem. I think that means you love some idea of what she or he will become, and not the person as she or he is. You're welcome to disagree. That's also one of my biggest problems with Christianity - probably coming from the Christian belief in a soul that somehow exists above and uncomplicit in sin. Like THE REAL MAGDALENE is a nice, beautiful person just kind of floating around while the Unreal, Earthly Magdalene does all this whoring. I just don't buy it. Like I said, feel free to disagree.
Re: a comment on the band by celticskatermatt1	ALChemy 24.74.101.159	9-Nov-05/7:07 AM
Just wait till you hit 30 my friend.
Re: a comment on I LOVE A PROSTITUTE by Bhaskaryya	ALChemy 24.74.101.159	9-Nov-05/7:03 AM
There's no concrete evidence to support Mary Magdalene was even a prostitute. It's just as likely she was the mother of The Christ's child that is if you choose to be at the other gullible end of the spectrum. Hey, I've come to realize that just about every Indian (is that the right term) I've met has had a better english vocabulary then most southerners. I myself don't know a damn word of indian.
Re: a comment on the band by celticskatermatt1	zodiac 217.144.7.195	9-Nov-05/7:01 AM
That's odd. You'd think if I were 18 I'd have denied being 26, a disgraceful age if there ever was one. Of course, what it really comes down to is, I've currently acheived the happiness I grew up thinking I was entitled to. Can you say that?
Re: a comment on Posted Pelicans by Dovina	zodiac 217.144.7.195	9-Nov-05/6:58 AM
You're right. How could I have missed such a big part of our conversations? DOVINA: You're getting off topic. ZODIAC: I think that about covers it.
Re: Sleep by ALChemy	Bhaskaryya 202.63.190.227	9-Nov-05/6:56 AM
The poem ofcourse is great but you've used 10+ syllables in a few line. Don't they break out of the pentameter? And just couldn't resist nitpicking on this bit of a comment by you. "actually excepted as a word" Isn't that supposed to be 'accepted'?