Re: fuck you by gsosville |
15-Aug-02/6:04 AM |
|
|
regarding some deleted poem... |
16-Aug-02/5:43 AM |
Why do people try and comment on "appropriate Stanza" etc etc?
Surely "total shite" is enough?!?!
|
|
|
|
Re: ''*Night*'' by youngweirdo |
17-Aug-02/3:54 PM |
Young? Perhaps. Talented? I think not. A wierdo? Most assuredly. My good chap, you should be ashamed of yourself. This is G.C.S.E. poetry at it's worst. For your crimes against the English language you should be hung, drawn and quartered - and then presented to Satan on a pewter platter to do as He will. Shocking. 1/10.
|
|
|
|
Re: eat a grape please by skaskowski |
17-Aug-02/3:58 PM |
I think the most constructive comment I am able to muster is simply thus: Occasionally you should consider leaving your room. Shambolic. 2/10, and that is considering that I am feeling particularly generous on this night.
|
|
|
|
regarding some deleted poem... |
17-Aug-02/4:06 PM |
A reasonable effort. What we truly need in today's ailing society is more poems about the unkempt monkey - le twat d'ruffle if you will. 9/10. Keep it up.
|
|
|
|
Re: Dirty Pops by Tarquin De La Bog |
20-Aug-02/4:35 AM |
A rather delectable haiku on what I presume to be a fairly tacky drug experience. I particularly like your use of repetition to hammer home your point with authority. 9/10.
|
|
|
|
Re: Multicultural motel by Ming T. Merciless |
23-Aug-02/6:46 AM |
A rather interesting sideways view of multicultural society and how several peoples can be integrated whilst still alienating others - a very moving piece. 8/10. I will follow your work, He Who Has No Mercy.
|
|
|
|
Re: The green mile by Ming T. Merciless |
4-Sep-02/3:14 AM |
Oh dear. Having been impressed by some of your earlier work, I feel only disappointment having read this dire effort. 1/10. Come on Ming, surely you can do better than this!
|
|
|
|
Re: purple by youngweirdo |
6-Sep-02/6:25 AM |
I like your thinking - you may be young, you may also be wierd, but I'll follow your work. 8. Also nothing rhymes with "orange", which pisses me off.
|
|
|
|
Re: My Sun by T. Becquerel |
6-Sep-02/6:26 AM |
Uandulterated cat litter, this, I'm afraid. I hope I never see another of your poems again. 2/10.
|
|
|
|
Re: My Sun by T. Becquerel |
6-Sep-02/6:28 AM |
Unadulterated cat litter, this, I'm afraid. I hope I never see another of your poems again. 2/10.
|
|
|
|
Re: My Sun by T. Becquerel |
6-Sep-02/6:30 AM |
Unadulterated cat litter, this, I'm afraid. I hope I never see another of your poems again. 2/10.
|
|
|
|
Re: My Sun by T. Becquerel |
6-Sep-02/6:30 AM |
Unadulterated cat litter, this, I'm afraid. I hope I never see another of your poems again. 2/10.
|
|
|
|
regarding some deleted poem... |
6-Sep-02/6:33 AM |
I hope you didn't spend too long writing this, as it is pure toss. Random words thrown together do not make poetry. 3/10. I've seen worse, but not much.
|
|
|
|
Re: Losing Control by Tarquin De La Bog |
9-Sep-02/4:50 AM |
A very good effort, T De La B. 8/10. The only reasons this has not been scored more highly are that I feel you have taken a little too much "creative inspiration" from Roald Dahl and also your consistent pottymouth.
|
|
|
|
Re: AIDS Bonanza! by -=Dark_Angel=-, P.I. |
8-Oct-02/5:01 AM |
Brilliant. 9. A highly enjoyable read. To the outraged commenteers: if you don't like his poems, don't read his poems. Simple.
|
|
|
|
regarding some deleted poem... |
10-Oct-02/9:46 AM |
Shocking. Many poets on this site post twaddle which hint at talent, thought, inspiration etc. You, however, are merely shit. 0. Get off the internet, you're late for nursery.
|
|
|
|
Re: Daywalker by Blade |
10-Oct-02/9:49 AM |
Here's one:
Poemwanker
He Writes
Mostly in,
crayon but it doesn't,
matter as it's just crap.
Utter tripe. 0/10.
|
|
|
|
Re: Daniela by little_angel_maria |
14-Oct-02/4:50 AM |
Hmmm. Hints at a dark experience, although sadly for you it is not conveyed well at all. I conclude that this is one of two things: a)the nonsensical ramblings of a moron or b) simply a bad, bad poem. 2/10.
|
|
|
|
Re: America by little_angel_maria |
14-Oct-02/4:54 AM |
Sorry, but I just think this is childish pap. Poor structure, very wishy-washy, and very cliched. 1/10
|
|
|
|