Re: a comment on Reconstruction by andrewjthomas |
26-Jan-04/5:31 PM |
|
 |
Re: a comment on Reconstruction by andrewjthomas |
26-Jan-04/5:16 PM |
ok, unless you are actually from the UK you just lost cool points for gratuitous use of the letter U :P
and i'm looking for a word that implies washed-out, used up
|
|
|
 |
Re: a comment on Reconstruction by andrewjthomas |
26-Jan-04/5:02 PM |
hmmm, i'm thinking of changing line 8 to:
with effete colors standing out so lonely.
thoughts?
|
|
|
 |
Re: a comment on Reconstruction by andrewjthomas |
26-Jan-04/4:57 PM |
added a second line for 6
|
|
|
 |
Re: a comment on Reconstruction by andrewjthomas |
26-Jan-04/4:54 PM |
excellent feedback, thanks
i agree with 6&8 but have no quick solutions at the moment
made many of the changes you suggested for 23&24 but "these" stays
fixed "heard" (definitely made this tighter, thanks again)
courtesy should stay i think
|
|
|
 |
Re: a comment on Reconstruction by andrewjthomas |
26-Jan-04/4:50 PM |
beloved it is, thank you so much for the excellent feedback
this is the best interaction i've had anywhere online
|
|
|
 |
Re: a comment on Pine by andrewjthomas |
26-Jan-04/3:10 PM |
yeah, i completely agree
i just haven't had the heart to take the shears to it yet
care to point out the bits that shouldn't get cut?
|
|
|
 |
Re: a comment on Reconstruction by andrewjthomas |
26-Jan-04/3:08 PM |
oh, how about "fulsome"? that still has the general gist of what i'm trying to imply...
|
|
|
 |
Re: a comment on Reconstruction by andrewjthomas |
26-Jan-04/3:03 PM |
heh, just as long as you don't say "saccharine"
i personally don't go for any of those, but thanks
also, i could change it from "shining" to "shines" and that would complete the clause...
|
|
|
 |
Re: a comment on Reconstruction by andrewjthomas |
26-Jan-04/2:52 PM |
well, i'm no fan of overused and cliché words either
but sometimes on the rare occasion they fit
still, i'm open to suggestions, got any?
also, do you think the un-ended clause works?
|
|
|
 |
Re: a comment on Reconstruction by andrewjthomas |
26-Jan-04/2:50 PM |
|
 |
Re: a comment on Reconstruction by andrewjthomas |
26-Jan-04/2:44 PM |
wow, good critique (i really don't mind and i appreciate the in-depth commenting)
i agree with dropping "and" and "The", nice catch
i did mean for the passage to not form a clause but i'm still debating if it works
i think if people keep getting hung up it may be a problem
i'm not sold on taking out "sweet"
there needs to be some kind of adjective there pointing out the beauty of the self-destruction being witnessed
|
|
|
 |
Re: Cupid promised me, Nadine by Shardik |
10-Jan-04/10:13 PM |
|
 |
Re: Air sickness bag by Shardik |
10-Jan-04/10:06 PM |
|
 |
Re: Liberty bells & Disney Land by horus8 |
10-Jan-04/10:05 PM |
hmmm, solid concrete
not sure what you are trying to say though
still, it's good in what it is
|
|
|
 |
Re: The canary's last song by <{Baba^Yaga}> |
30-May-03/2:16 PM |
i would give a higher rank, but it doesn't follow 5-7-5 syllable restriction
but the content is very cool
|
|
|
 |
Re: A Sonnet For Santa Claus, Who Hates Jesus, But Likes When You Buy Things by snacktime |
5-May-03/10:37 AM |
pretty interesting poem, structurally sound, but i think your iambic meter could use a little work
i liked it, but it does feel a bit preachy (but maybe that's what you were going for?)
|
|
|
 |
Re: While flipping over stones by <{Baba^Yaga}> |
5-May-03/10:35 AM |
your content and ryhme are excellent, and your meter over all is iambic, but you miss the "pentameter" part of the english sonnet form
basically every line should have 10 syllables
otherwise, good work!
|
|
|
 |
Re: THE MISSING HEART by Prince of Void |
5-May-03/10:32 AM |
this is not a sonnet, you should look up the structure...
sonnets are strictly iambic pentameter, you can deviate a little, but not that much
you also follow a strict ryhme scheme depending on the type
english sonnet for instance is: abab cdcd efef gg
that last couplet (gg) should answer the previous stanzas somehow
|
|
|
 |
Re: News Values (some time last November) by Nicholas Jones |
5-May-03/10:29 AM |
very well structured, very nice iambic and ryhme
i would suggest working on the couplet at the end... it feels a little stilted
|
|
|
 |