Help | About | Suggestions | Alms | Chat [0] | Users [0] | Log In | Join
 Search:
Poem: Submit | Random | Best | Worst | Recent | Comments   

Reconstruction (Free verse) by andrewjthomas
I’ve given up on great dreaming watching your beloved train wreck scatter debris – a ruin of start. Your stop signs bent rusted and knock-kneed, a gutter of promise and threadbare. This all feels pothole and picture portrait, with vignette colors standing out so lonely. I’m tired of rubble and five o’clock shadows at three in the morning. Sirens call out for validation and a truce of battlements while this deconstruction of residential zoning half-burnt brick and mortar shell shines. I loved you and your tired desolation – every pebble, every cornerstone crack. From the tip of your flagpole to the sepia sewage grate, I sing these battle hymns to Dixie, cotton and unbroken. But it just feels folktale, and near the end, when we heard the marching machine of man I knew you would never even give me the courtesy of rebuild.

Down the ladder: True Love

You must be logged in to leave comments. Vote:

Votes: (green: user, blue: anonymous)
 GraphVotes
10  .. 21
.. 00
.. 10
.. 00
.. 00
.. 00
.. 00
.. 00
.. 00
.. 00
.. 10

Arithmetic Mean: 7.6
Weighted score: 5.3099275
Overall Rank: 3593
Posted: January 26, 2004 12:55 PM PST; Last modified: January 26, 2004 5:44 PM PST
View voting details
Comments:
[10] zodiac @ 152.30.23.24 | 26-Jan-04/2:40 PM | Reply
The passage "while this deconstruction of residential
zoning half-burnt brick and mortar shell shining," doesn't form a clause. What happens "while"? I would understand if you meant for it to be like that, with the abruptness of "rebuild" and all, but if not it needs a verb. I would also take the "sweet" out of "sweet train wreck" and even (really controlling unsolicited advice here) drop the "and" from the beginning of that line and the "The" before sirens. It's really good otherwise. Don't think I criticized so much because I don't like it. You'll see I'm harder on the good ones.
[n/a] andrewjthomas @ 192.150.10.200 > zodiac | 26-Jan-04/2:44 PM | Reply
wow, good critique (i really don't mind and i appreciate the in-depth commenting)
i agree with dropping "and" and "The", nice catch
i did mean for the passage to not form a clause but i'm still debating if it works
i think if people keep getting hung up it may be a problem
i'm not sold on taking out "sweet"
there needs to be some kind of adjective there pointing out the beauty of the self-destruction being witnessed
[10] zodiac @ 152.30.23.24 > andrewjthomas | 26-Jan-04/2:47 PM | Reply
>>"there needs to be some kind of adjective there pointing out the beauty of the self-destruction being witnessed "

Maybe, but not 'sweet.' Of course, you'll find I am the shameless (and rather zealous) scourge of poetic adjectives and modifiers.
[n/a] andrewjthomas @ 192.150.10.200 > zodiac | 26-Jan-04/2:52 PM | Reply
well, i'm no fan of overused and cliché words either
but sometimes on the rare occasion they fit
still, i'm open to suggestions, got any?
also, do you think the un-ended clause works?
[10] zodiac @ 152.30.23.24 > andrewjthomas | 26-Jan-04/2:57 PM | Reply
"also, do you think the un-ended clause works?" Sort of. Maybe do away with the period and hope no one notices. If they do, it'll run into 'I loved' pretty nicely. I don't think anyone's being serious here tonight, or I'd turn it over to the crowd for a new 'sweet' - an sweet substitute, if you will. My votes: dreamlike, phatasmagoric, slow-motion... (more to follow)
[n/a] andrewjthomas @ 192.150.10.200 > zodiac | 26-Jan-04/3:03 PM | Reply
heh, just as long as you don't say "saccharine"
i personally don't go for any of those, but thanks
also, i could change it from "shining" to "shines" and that would complete the clause...
[10] zodiac @ 152.30.88.96 > andrewjthomas | 26-Jan-04/3:20 PM | Reply
That works fine.
[n/a] andrewjthomas @ 192.150.10.200 > zodiac | 26-Jan-04/3:08 PM | Reply
oh, how about "fulsome"? that still has the general gist of what i'm trying to imply...
[10] zodiac @ 152.30.88.96 > andrewjthomas | 26-Jan-04/3:15 PM | Reply
Nah.
[10] Goad @ 217.82.0.76 > andrewjthomas | 26-Jan-04/4:44 PM | Reply
how about darling?
same gist, more over the top in keeping with the rest. or beloved? used there it would almost be an epithet...
[10] zodiac @ 152.30.201.172 > Goad | 26-Jan-04/4:49 PM | Reply
I agree. It makes it something more than an adjective.
[n/a] andrewjthomas @ 192.150.10.200 > zodiac | 26-Jan-04/4:50 PM | Reply
beloved it is, thank you so much for the excellent feedback
this is the best interaction i've had anywhere online
[10] Goad @ 217.82.0.76 > andrewjthomas | 26-Jan-04/5:05 PM | Reply
No problem, please return the favour and hack the hell out of some of my stuff. (Goad, middenHeap, lastobelus)
[7] Shardik @ 24.126.116.54 | 26-Jan-04/2:45 PM | Reply
Pan handler.
[n/a] andrewjthomas @ 192.150.10.200 > Shardik | 26-Jan-04/2:50 PM | Reply
and by that you mean...?
[7] Shardik @ 24.126.116.54 > andrewjthomas | 26-Jan-04/5:21 PM | Reply
pan handler?
[n/a] unouluvme @ 66.167.71.91 | 26-Jan-04/4:19 PM | Reply
Huh. I am definitley not your biggest fan. But i like this one. 8 work for you?
[10] Goad @ 217.82.0.76 | 26-Jan-04/4:41 PM | Reply
mmmm, yummy word soup. I'm such a sucker for syncopation.

L. 6 feels isolated, can he get a companion clause?
L. 8 is too weak rhythmically to stand with the rest, get a spondee or two in there. You could just delete "so" for a spondee.

L23-24. get rid of "these" and "of", and match your tenses: I sing battle hymns to Dixie, cotton and unbroken/But it just feels folktale.

you wishy washy out near the end! How about "in the end when we heard", and find a way to get rid of courtesy if you can.

i agreed with zodiacs suggestions also, except that I don't mind sweet. lol, we had a fight over the word thing once.
[n/a] andrewjthomas @ 192.150.10.200 > Goad | 26-Jan-04/4:54 PM | Reply
excellent feedback, thanks
i agree with 6&8 but have no quick solutions at the moment
made many of the changes you suggested for 23&24 but "these" stays
fixed "heard" (definitely made this tighter, thanks again)
courtesy should stay i think
[10] zodiac @ 152.30.201.172 > Goad | 26-Jan-04/4:54 PM | Reply
As far as line 6, just a comma from the previous line or into the following line would suffice. In a pinch it'll work as is.

In line 8 (if you want to follow Goad's track, which is pretty good) you might consider changing 'many', which is not poetic in the sense you're aiming for. If you do, don't think of synonyms for many, think of something on the fringe of synonymity (which is not, as far as I know, a real word.)

I'm not as worried about the Dixie battle hymns as Goad is. But he's got a good ear.
[n/a] andrewjthomas @ 192.150.10.200 > zodiac | 26-Jan-04/4:57 PM | Reply
added a second line for 6
[10] Goad @ 217.82.0.76 > zodiac | 26-Jan-04/5:02 PM | Reply
I agree, if you want to keep "so" ditch many and get two hard consonants in there.

I of course would not be able to resist saying "with the van gogh colours standing out lonely" lolololol
[n/a] andrewjthomas @ 192.150.10.200 > zodiac | 26-Jan-04/5:02 PM | Reply
hmmm, i'm thinking of changing line 8 to:

with effete colors standing out so lonely.

thoughts?
[10] zodiac @ 152.30.201.172 > andrewjthomas | 26-Jan-04/5:03 PM | Reply
Daring. I don't know what to think.
[10] Goad @ 217.82.0.76 > andrewjthomas | 26-Jan-04/5:10 PM | Reply
hmmm, doesn't work for me.
hit'n'miss colours??
stray bullet colours??
[n/a] andrewjthomas @ 192.150.10.200 > Goad | 26-Jan-04/5:16 PM | Reply
ok, unless you are actually from the UK you just lost cool points for gratuitous use of the letter U :P
and i'm looking for a word that implies washed-out, used up
[10] Goad @ 217.82.0.76 > andrewjthomas | 26-Jan-04/5:18 PM | Reply
rained out

I'm canadian.
[n/a] andrewjthomas @ 192.150.10.200 > Goad | 26-Jan-04/5:31 PM | Reply
Canadian? fair enough
[10] Goad @ 217.82.0.76 > andrewjthomas | 26-Jan-04/5:26 PM | Reply
hell, then just say used up! but say your

your used up colors standing out so lonely

that gives you everything, an alliteration, a molossus for continued syncoptatic goodness, and the implication you desire. lol.

[n/a] andrewjthomas @ 192.150.10.200 > Goad | 26-Jan-04/5:34 PM | Reply
hmmm, i think that'd be too obvious
[n/a] andrewjthomas @ 192.150.10.200 > Goad | 26-Jan-04/5:45 PM | Reply
problem solved, i went with vignette, which goes nicely with "picture portrait"
and implies that the ornate decoration is standing out lonely because the actual photo doesn't measure up
[n/a] -=Dark_Angel=-, P.I. @ 163.1.146.87 > andrewjthomas | 26-Jan-04/5:29 PM | Reply
Wherever possible, one should always include husks in their work.

with effete colors standing out so lonely,
like wither'd husks in the moonlight.
[10] Goad @ 217.82.0.76 > -=Dark_Angel=-, P.I. | 26-Jan-04/5:31 PM | Reply
If we include you, does that count?
[n/a] -=Dark_Angel=-, P.I. @ 163.1.146.87 > Goad | 26-Jan-04/5:51 PM | Reply
Me? A husk? A ha ha I wish. No, my behuskéd days are over, long since wither'd away, their dry shavlings scatter'd about the land like dead leaves. No, the years of the Dung Pupa are upon me now; my final stage of metamorphosis before the harsh sands of time slip through my inner-underpant lining, and linger there forever, uncomfortably nestled 'tween the stained cheekes of my rear-bosom ere I become gnarled beyond all recognition.
[10] zodiac @ 67.240.192.127 > -=Dark_Angel=-, P.I. | 27-Jan-04/9:45 AM | Reply
I'd be obliged if you could direct me to some good husk potery sometime.
[n/a] andrewjthomas @ 192.150.10.200 > -=Dark_Angel=-, P.I. | 26-Jan-04/5:31 PM | Reply
huh? everyone knows it's tusks, not husks

like wither'd tusks in the moonlight
[n/a] -=Dark_Angel=-, P.I. @ 163.1.146.87 > andrewjthomas | 27-Jan-04/5:50 AM | Reply
If you think tusks are better than husks then I feel sorry for you.
[10] zodiac @ 67.240.155.130 > -=Dark_Angel=-, P.I. | 26-Jan-04/6:10 PM | Reply
"with effete colors standing out so lonely,
like wither'd husks in the moonlight."

Sadly, the best two lines written on poemranker today. I had to repeat them.
[n/a] -=Dark_Angel=-, P.I. @ 163.1.146.87 | 26-Jan-04/5:12 PM | Reply
toilet
[10] Goad @ 217.82.0.76 > -=Dark_Angel=-, P.I. | 26-Jan-04/5:16 PM | Reply
Nooo, colonic massage.
[7] Shardik @ 24.126.116.54 > -=Dark_Angel=-, P.I. | 26-Jan-04/5:20 PM | Reply
brush
[10] Goad @ 217.82.0.76 > Shardik | 26-Jan-04/5:27 PM | Reply
Nooo...slender, tentative girl-fingers.
[n/a] Jeremi B. Handrinos @ 24.126.116.54 > Goad | 26-Jan-04/5:46 PM | Reply
Finger banging causes gardenerella, I know, my mustache is green.
[10] http://mulberryfairy @ 216.195.166.162 | 26-Jan-04/7:18 PM | Reply
Beautiful and dramatic. I can't recommend any changes to its present form. 10
293 view(s)




Track and Plan your submissions ; Read some Comics ; Get Paid for your Poetry
PoemRanker Copyright © 2001 - 2024 - kaolin fire - All Rights Reserved
All poems Copyright © their respective authors
An internet tradition since June 9, 2001