Re: a comment on We'll be right back after these messages by INTRANSIT	4-Jan-06/2:57 PM
And you should go fly a plane. Basso, preferably.
Re: a comment on light [edited] by lmp	4-Jan-06/2:53 PM
Ha! Duh on me.
Re: a comment on light [edited] by lmp	4-Jan-06/7:24 AM
You want her skin to usurp the morning which has usurped the rind, correct? I can see it. 17 syllables is not enough some times.
Re: a comment on light [edited] by lmp	4-Jan-06/7:20 AM
You're seeing rockmage on the side, arent you?
Re: a comment on Construction Lot (edit) by zodiac	4-Jan-06/7:17 AM
I agree. "Now there's a fence" works but maybe a fresh brick wall and the elbow of a backhoe jutting above. Or a washing machine. All poems are better with one of those.
Re: a comment on Nightfall by Niphredil	4-Jan-06/7:04 AM
It's not for me. though it does cause me to have snickerous thoughts about -=Dark-Angel=-.
Re: a comment on Nightfall by Niphredil	2-Jan-06/7:51 AM
My dic. says that it also means: Dark;dim. I'm guessing She went with darkling for flow/beat reasons.
Re: a comment on Nightfall by Niphredil	2-Jan-06/7:40 AM
Well, what exactly is the illogic in Nephs poem. the word darkling? Perhaps it's the pale glow in s-2 that leads us awry? I personally see no problem here.
Re: a comment on Nightfall by Niphredil	2-Jan-06/7:25 AM
Though I think (well-known) are the key words here. I'm sure one exists though I may not be able to find it as I'm not near as well read as others. What used to not make sense to me in my Kerouac , now does. But. Nothing's wrong Something's right W.C, fields bathrobe Kerouac that makes no sense to me. Funny though.
Re: a comment on Nightfall by Niphredil	2-Jan-06/7:18 AM
Kerouac comes to mind.
Re: a comment on Nightfall by Niphredil	2-Jan-06/7:12 AM
We have many trees in my neighborhood that have dark bark on them and they are still very dark in full daylight. I like the way the tree starts slightly ominous and becomes "friendly" by the end. Villanelles are a mother to do. I've only tried twice. Thus far.
Re: a comment on Nightfall by Niphredil	1-Jan-06/7:05 PM
Um, no. While I'm sure we could all use a little more uhurU, I'm talking about a Star Trek thing. Obviously you don't understand. I think you're being hyper-logical about the poem. Oh well.
Re: a comment on Nightfall by Niphredil	1-Jan-06/12:10 PM
What are you? 100% Vulcan? If every poem were perfectly logical, would they be poems anymore? I think not. They would be Wapiti. Either you've been spending too much time discussing certain things with a certain group or you need a heavy dose of Uhura.
Re: a comment on Romans 8:28 by amanda_dcosta	31-Dec-05/4:17 PM
"My name is Inigo Montoya. You keel my father. Prepare to die."
Re: a comment on Romans 8:28 by amanda_dcosta	31-Dec-05/6:30 AM
No one who has seen the princess bride should be touched. in any meaning of the word. that is my decree.
Re: a comment on Romans 8:28 by amanda_dcosta	31-Dec-05/6:26 AM
I disagree. Anyone who is anyone in the poemranker universe knows a queen always carries a good chainsaw. <~> has an Husqvarna. I've seen it. It's chrome!
Re: a comment on Memoirs of a miners son by Caducus	30-Dec-05/10:57 AM
Thanks C. you can't e-mail me anything at the moment. Cldtrky is non-operational and when I put it back up I'm sure it will be something else. People keep telling me I should get my feet wet but I keep asking myself "why?". That is to say I cannot come up with a valuable and logical reason to seek publication. Would you share your reasoning? I'm always open to opinion, even if I don't like it. Thanks again. Merry Bearings and Happy hydraulics to you.
Re: a comment on Crowded by INTRANSIT	29-Dec-05/9:15 PM
stinker.
Re: a comment on Memoirs of a miners son by Caducus	29-Dec-05/2:31 PM
Cldtrucky? cute. Hey, have you submitted anything offline/ by mail anywhere? If so, what was the result. Thanks.
Re: Romans 8:28 by amanda_dcosta	29-Dec-05/2:28 PM
I agree. Rhyme or don't rhyme, not both. It's fixable. Just read it over and over aloud and work out the bugs.