Thank daggatolar For comment on this poem : I think you are right , i agree with you....

Sorry. That comment was so obviously lame. Good poem 10+.

"Child of my Buttocks" is an endless, rambling collage of browne. It has about three funny lines and the rest is literally a giant guff. But that doesn't mean this poeme isn't plagiarised. It definitely, definitely is.

I think there's no way that it could be plagarised, becuase I love this poem and could barely finish yours...

If I made a mistake it was with the original posting. 'The best poets are the best critics' should have read 'the best poets must also be fine critics'. Sets are now irrelevant because it is entirely possible that there are simultaneously (good critics that can not write poetry) and (no good poets that are not good critics). Kenneth Tynan said a critic (what he meant was a critic that was not a good poet) was someone who new the map but could not drive the car. My argument is simple. A poet that does not know what makes could poetry can not possibly 'arrive' at good poetry. As an educated young man one would have thought you would be the first to agree. I am presuming you have no problem with the bit about stupid people don't matter. The PS question, well it did have effectively two negatives (anything other than) and (is bowl's).

"to prove good poets make good critics requires one to name good poets and not good critics" is obviously not the case. The set of {best poets who also happen to be best critics} should be exactly the same as the set of {best critics who also happen to be best poets}. That it's not is set to be the enduring smudge on the underclothes of your repute here. Give it up. I asked if you knew one good critic because I think you're talking entirely out of your ass, not because I care whether your argument is true or not (I know it's not.) PS-My last PS is two sentences. Do you find "Obviously 'statement X' is bow'ls" to be inordinately complicated?