poemranker ::Comments the most recent

CommentsComments 24561–24580 back, including replies. Only comments on poems

Dovina replying on A Better God by Dovina 26 Oct 2004, 10:15 AM
Oh I see, you want me to replace my gross error, "My creatures will discover all that I’ve made quite pleasing and right" with your sublime, "My creatures will find all the things that I've made quite pleasing and right".
Comment: By Frederick Rigglesmeyer Friffelschmidt. Yes, a womans bulging triceps are not something one should leave behind.
-=Dark_Angel=-, P.I. replying on Women by Bakar 26 Oct 2004, 8:22 AM
SHUT YOUR FACE
Caducus on Ghost Of Angels by Caducus 26 Oct 2004, 8:19 AM
horus please.
Dan garcia-Black on A Man Who Cares by Dovina 26 Oct 2004, 7:34 AM
Great storytelling. Has the chain been fixed yet?
zodiac replying on Who is deserving of all my love by zodiac 26 Oct 2004, 6:04 AM
I meant flinch. But now I'm considering using felch, which I find works just as well.
zodiac replying on Market Day in Al-Karak, South Jordan by zodiac 26 Oct 2004, 6:03 AM
Sorry. But this poem exists only because I thought it would be fun to write a poem using the word blunderbuss.
edpeterson on AIDS in a Glass by -=Dark_Angel=-, P.I. 26 Oct 2004, 5:07 AM
shame you could not work "tars" into this somehow.
edpeterson on Withering Rose by Imago 26 Oct 2004, 4:44 AM
i think that the home/beauty line is the best in the poem. it makes perfect sense to me...that where beauty has made residence, it will never stay, but always move on to find new residence. Beauty does not construct, but rather make "something" her home. I think it works. whether this is true or not, I cannot exactly say, nor do I particularly care. I like the theme, and I think the language is well used in some parts, but, overall, I think you need to pull in the reins a little, as much of this feels over the top, but perhaps the "floweriness" of the language is apt after all. what the fuck would i know? anyway, i think the ending is good, if a bit overplayed and somewhat cliche.
edpeterson on Old Friends by breeza123 26 Oct 2004, 4:30 AM
unspeakably daft.
this is excellent. In stanza 8 perhaps you mean flinch when you write flich? or is flich a word I have never heard?
Splendid, like a piece of warm toast firmly wedged in the buttocks of an Arab child.
zodiac replying on One True Instant by Dovina 26 Oct 2004, 12:55 AM
The [White House] aide said that guys like me were "in what we call the reality-based community," which he defined as people who "believe that solutions emerge from your judicious study of discernible reality." I nodded and murmured something about enlightenment principles and empiricism. He cut me off. "That's not the way the world really works anymore," he continued. "We're an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you're studying that reality—judiciously, as you will—we'll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that's how things will sort out. We're history's actors ... and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do." - Ron Suskind
zodiac replying on A Better God by Dovina 26 Oct 2004, 12:41 AM
I am a Milwaukee Jerky Baron with a philanthropic streak. You are a relic of the Victorians. I'm Christopher Reeve's character in the film "The Remains of the Day". You're Christopher Reeve with more hair and not dead.
Imago on Vesper Song by M Hamill 26 Oct 2004, 12:38 AM
sorry I meant Mark Hamill. I need sleep.
zodiac replying on A Better God by Dovina 26 Oct 2004, 12:38 AM
In all seriousness, can you see the differences between the following: a) "discover all that I’ve made quite pleasing and right"; b) my simplified example, "discover a dog friendly"; and c) the structure in your comment, "discover what god has made and find it pleasing"? In the first two, "discover" is performing the action which results in "pleasing and right"; in the last "find" is. I see now you meant to use "discover" as a synonym for "find", which of course it is, but not in the sense that you can "find grammar difficult", you see? Why not correct it by simply saying something like "My creatures will find all the things that I've made quite pleasing and right etc etc". As far as "not a technical writing on science and religion" goes, what do you mean? And why shouldn't a poem hold together somewhat logically, grammatically, philosophically and so on and so on and so on. I don't know if you read poetry, or what kind of poetry you read, but I dare you to find me a famous poem that's not pretty consistent in these respects. At least, I can't think of any at the moment. Hey, thanks for listening.
Imago replying on Withering Rose by Imago 25 Oct 2004, 9:01 PM
Oh OK. I'm open to more suggestions. Plus I would like to see some of your more conventional poetry posted. I know you have some mad ass rhymes in you. I'll look for them.
Dovina replying on Withering Rose by Imago 25 Oct 2004, 8:54 PM
I didn't mean to hurt your head, and I knew what you meant. Those lines were not well stated, that was all.
Imago on A Man Who Cares by Dovina 25 Oct 2004, 8:23 PM
An Ode to plumbers everywhere. Nice little ditty.
Imago on Vesper Song by M Hamill 25 Oct 2004, 8:18 PM
Your first name's not Scott is it? "May the verse be with you."