poemranker ::Comments the most recent

CommentsComments 22201–22220 back, including replies. Only comments on poems

Dovina replying on In Answer To Your Question by Dovina 29 Jan 2005, 11:29 AM
Perhaps I should have added that it seemed what they were promising was more than either of them could deliver should the circumstances shown in the poem come to pass – his going to the ends of the earth and doing the most despicable things, or his cruelties and abuses, or hers. I know few women who seem able to keep their promise of “For better or worse” if he does those things and keeps doing them. My parents made it together for 55 years until death parted them, but neither of them faced great infidelity or abuse. Their marriage and yours are love as it should be.
jroday replying on In Answer To Your Question by Dovina 29 Jan 2005, 7:38 AM
You are right! As far as this poem goes. But it can be done if you are marrying for all the right reasons, and sometimes that's not enough. Believe me It's not easy, because once you get married seem like the devil put all kind of temptation around you. And being a man it's very hard, but I thank the Lord I never messed around on my wife. The family that prays together stays together. I can only speak for myself.
zodiac replying on #28 by Lifeboatman 29 Jan 2005, 2:57 AM
No I didn't. No, it's not. And no I didn't.
zodiac replying on Waiting for October by wilco 29 Jan 2005, 2:53 AM
The Albuquerque International Balloon Fiesta. The Paris-Deauville Antique Automobile Race. The 'Head of the Charles' Regatta. The World Series. Simon Cowell's 'Incredibly Gay' Birthday Party.
zodiac replying on In Answer To Your Question by Dovina 29 Jan 2005, 2:37 AM
Of course you'd ask that. But of course you also think it's cool to write a poem called "Impenetrable Pistachio" and regularly use the word "doodie" instead of shit.
zodiac replying on In Answer To Your Question by Dovina 29 Jan 2005, 2:30 AM
"Larry Summers, the president of Harvard, suggested the other day that innate differences between the sexes might help explain why relatively few women become professional scientists or engineers. For this, he has been denounced—metaphorically, of course—as a Neanderthal. Alumni are withholding donations. Professors are demanding apologies. Some want him fired." http://www.slate.com/id/2112570/
PsydewaysTears replying on Devil, Devil, Hear Me Pray by PsydewaysTears 28 Jan 2005, 10:36 PM
well, I don't believe in the Devil or worship..... anything at all. But I do have my moments when, to me, it seems he sets the mood grandly.
some deleted user on Never Said Thank You by unouluvme 28 Jan 2005, 7:07 PM
Sorry- hit a 6 by accident--I give you a ten!
some deleted user on Never Said Thank You by unouluvme 28 Jan 2005, 7:06 PM
Good poem.
wilco on This > That...Why? by MacFrantic 28 Jan 2005, 6:42 PM
Not lovin' this one as much. Not too bad, but doesn't really stand out.
wilco on Hades Ain't Far Enough by MacFrantic 28 Jan 2005, 6:41 PM
This one I likes.
wilco on Ode to a Friend by tadpole 28 Jan 2005, 6:39 PM
This should be under acrostic. No offense, but I'm not lovin' this one...
wilco on just can't by shygirl1619 28 Jan 2005, 6:34 PM
Spelling and grammar. Need to fix deez things, yo.
wilco on Never Said Thank You by unouluvme 28 Jan 2005, 6:31 PM
Reminds me of that Jimmy Eats World song....Not bad, but you could stand to put a little more thought into it. Seems more like just emotion.
wilco on Devil, Devil, Hear Me Pray by PsydewaysTears 28 Jan 2005, 6:26 PM
I've never understood the whole Devil worship thing. If you believe in that whole fairy tale about God and the Devil, why would you choose to worship the one thats going to make you suffer forever...must be a masochist. Anyway, some of the lines aren't bad, the subject notwithstanding.
the leaving lines are too close together, I think. Maybe you were going for a repetition thing there, but I think it would work better if you changed one of the leavings to something else.
wilco replying on Waiting for October by wilco 28 Jan 2005, 6:20 PM
She's waiting for October. I'd love to hear what you think it's about.
-=Dark_Angel=-, P.I. replying on In Answer To Your Question by Dovina 28 Jan 2005, 2:48 PM
It isn't better to do more per se. But it is better to at least have the option of doing more. A strong man is not compelled to use his strength inappropriately. But a weakling is compelled to be weak inappropriately. Strength is therefore better than weakness, as any avid stat-based RPGer will tell you.
Shuushin replying on In Answer To Your Question by Dovina 28 Jan 2005, 12:47 PM
But why is it better to do more?
-=Dark_Angel=-, P.I. replying on In Answer To Your Question by Dovina 28 Jan 2005, 12:36 PM
Being stronger is better, because a strong thing can do all the things a weak thing can do, plus a bit more. Ditto being smarter. That's why vegetarians will always be worse than normals, because normals are capable of eating VEGETABLES AND MEAT, vegetarians can only eat VEGETABLES :(