wilco
replying on Simple by wilco
12 Feb 2005, 8:27 PM
thanks.
Not loving the poem so much, but I like the title a lot. So, *7*.
so good, very nice picture. *9*
Reminds me of...oh, whats that thing from church...about forgiving those who trespass....I don;t know....been a long time. Anyway, I think that this was a "I need something to post poem (sorry, not trying to be mean). I just know what you're capable of and I expect more. You know I got much love for ya. ;)
definitely needs a line that stands out. *7*
Man, that was such an entertaining poem! Little changes here and there-I won't be specific- and it's perfect! *10*
Can you put a single stanza in your "favorites" section?
Oh, please get rid of L4. *7*
Interesting venture.
The structure could use some work.
*6*
Why not just call it "The Name of the Rose" *5*
I can't believe I'm saying this, but if this had actually been a prose poem, I might have given it a higher score. And don't use "evermore" ever or more.
*8*
3 dot.coms send the message. *4*
Only major problem- other than the whole "prose" thing-is the large space near the end. Find some way to fix it. *7* (I automatically deduct 1 point for prose, sorry)
wonderful, absolutely wonderful!
almost a favorite. *10*
A lot of vague attempts at imagery here that are not developed. Some seem there only for rhyme and rhythm. The cadance is good, but I miss finding any strong point to it all.
A tender expression of love. The king James English is a nice touch, but several places, I believe the grammar is wrong.
Line 1 - "doth" is spelled "doeth", but should be "do" in the plural, or just leave it out. Other lines similar.
"shalt" should be "shall" after an I.
"surely thou doth knowest" -> surely thou knowest
"inspiring my soul to happily moan" - good line.
Thank you Dovina for showing me my faults.
Again thanks.
Aint nothin' so good as luve!
A few too many words, I think. Here's what I'd do:
Line 5 - scratch "One that has"
Line 6 - scratch "being on"
Line 8 - scatch "within" and change "cause" to "'cause"
Thanks jroday, you must have picked up on the âofâ in the title, rather than the usual âfor.â