Re: Reptilian by Christof	10-Oct-03/6:52 AM
"brownness" is a difficult word because one doesn't know whether pronounce it "brown ness" or "browness". In fact, it was for that very reason (the consecutive occurrence of the same consonant) that the world famous magician and entertainer Paul Daniels actually changed is first name from Ted to Paul. May I suggest you replace "brownness" with "brownliness"?
Re: a comment on A History of Truth by Blue Magpie	9-Oct-03/4:54 PM
You SHOULD take Joseph Smith more seriously. If it hadn't been for him, the gold tablets would never have been engraved. Hardly a trivial figure in philosophical history, you must admit.
Re: a comment on Timmy Christ didn't like Dr. Seuss by Y2kSlamPoet	9-Oct-03/9:24 AM
The funniest thing about this poeme is SupremeDreamer's laughable attempt at making it rhyme. I eagerly await his next, even riper offering which, I might add, is rumored to not only rhyme, but also vaguely scan!!!!111
Re: Timmy Christ didn't like Dr. Seuss by Y2kSlamPoet	9-Oct-03/2:00 AM
Ace use of "smiley" to rhyme with "glee" and "looney" to rhyme with "sea"!!!111
Re: a comment on Life on the Sidewalk (with superfluous vulgarisms) by ?-Dave_Mysterious-?	8-Oct-03/2:10 PM
I'm ashamed to admit it, but it's true. Just have a look at this felched-up bumstain: "AIDS The Wonderhorse" (Limerick) by -=Dark_Angel=- There once was some AIDS in a [fortune] cookie That was sold by a dunce to a bookie For the fool had not seen Where the virus had been So he peddled it off like a rookie!
Re: a comment on The Wrath of Dan Ackroyd by ?-Dave_Mysterious-?	8-Oct-03/4:09 AM
The point is that anyone with an ounce of sense would have chosen Chevy Chase as a metaphor for John Candy. That's why choosing Dan Ackroyd is an inherently funny thing to do.
Re: a comment on Trailer Park: Diary of a Hayseed by DreamerSupreme	8-Oct-03/3:45 AM
Moonshine is one word. "my window's view". Frankly, I'm appalled.
Re: a comment on Life on the Sidewalk (with superfluous vulgarisms) by ?-Dave_Mysterious-?	7-Oct-03/3:54 PM
My childhood was far from idyllic, yet there is nothing wrong with my IQ - it's just a shade under 98 which is well within the normal range. I've worked hard despite the hardships I've faced, and I'm proud of the fact that while my upbringing may have been materially underprivileged, at least I had intellect and could entertain myself with my own creative thoughts and emotions. 113, you say? I had no idea you were so gifted. I look forward to more of your poetry.
Re: a comment on The Wrath of Dan Ackroyd by ?-Dave_Mysterious-?	7-Oct-03/6:04 AM
you are the master of not getting it
Re: Roman Toes Power the Local Crushery by DreamerSupreme	5-Oct-03/8:33 AM
What's going through your mind when you decide to put a line break in?
Re: 195.157.153.253 by <~>	5-Oct-03/5:02 AM
Whose IP is that? It belongs to at least 4 users: Edible Underpants King Abdulla I King Abdulla II Vampiros Lesbos But I don't think it is Settle because it is a London based IP address. You've probably had this conversation loads of times before, and I'm probably being a doddery old fool who couldn't even "get with the times" if "the times" had accidentally broken both its legs in a freak bludgeoning accident, but do you know who it is?
Re: a comment on Dark Angel. Mature? or foul? by Don-Quixote	5-Oct-03/4:29 AM
Am I mature?
Re: a comment on Dark Angel. Mature? or foul? by Don-Quixote	4-Oct-03/12:49 PM
It's painfully obvious that with four usernames, and more if you so wanted, you could have easily avoided deleting the detective watson debate. You censored it out. For obvious reasons. Why don't I answer my questions myself? Because for the most part I don't know the answers. I don't always know what motivates you without asking. That doesn't mean I can't spot a bosh answer when I see one. If I asked you for the square root of the number 91119, and you said "A small fishing village just south of the Norfolk Broads", I'd know it was a stupid answer. That doesn't mean I know what the correct answer is.
Re: a comment on Dark Angel. Mature? or foul? by Don-Quixote	4-Oct-03/12:43 PM
What do you think it means to be mature?
Re: a comment on Dark Angel. Mature? or foul? by Don-Quixote	4-Oct-03/12:22 PM
what about the dates?
Re: a comment on Dark Angel. Mature? or foul? by Don-Quixote	4-Oct-03/12:21 PM
Well it's hardly surprising that at odds of 1-1 in the "Who's going to make SupremeDreamer look stupidest" stakes, -=Dark_Angel=- comes up trumps every time.
Re: a comment on Dark Angel. Mature? or foul? by Don-Quixote	4-Oct-03/12:18 PM
So your reason for deleting my comments and posting this is that you're a loose cannon who plays by his own rules and likes to keep people on their toes by swinging wildly about the place making a scene? Because that's even more stupid than that -shrug- answer you gave earlier. Your "At least now theres no need to rely on false statements against my name" excuse makes absolutely no sense at all since you must admit that you deleted most of the Detective Watson debate as well as the "cuisine" debate.
Re: Dark Angel. Mature? or foul? by Don-Quixote	4-Oct-03/11:34 AM
What's your point? And don't say something predictable like "I don't give a shit if there's a point or not" or "There is no point because I'm on drugs". The truth of the matter is that there are reasons for all of your actions but those reasons are so mind-blowingly stupid and wrong that you'd rather pretend they don't exist.
Re: a comment on Aluminum Shackles - Titanium Quills by SupremeDreamer	4-Oct-03/11:28 AM
drivel
Re: a comment on Aluminum Shackles - Titanium Quills by SupremeDreamer	4-Oct-03/11:09 AM
Have you committed "Real censorship"? The answer is "yes". Therefore your original remark was complete bollocks just as I said. Shall we move on? The thing I find so extraordinary about you is that whenever I question one of your actions - such as deleting my comments or randomly inserting the word "cuisine" into your work - you instantly jump on the defensive accusing me of sulking or making up convoluted reports of foulplay or spouting hot air or being stubborn or whatever, and then, after a little thought, you say that actually the word "cuisine" shouldn't have been there afterall, that you are indeed guilty of censorship and that it doesn't really look good for you, that you've had your fair share of comment deletions and now it's your turn, etc. And when I ask you why you did these things the answer is: -shrug-, or "I don't give a shit what I do", or "It's the drugs, man". So in light of such excellent and well-thought-out motives, can you really blame me for questioning your actions? The answer is "no".