LOL

Yeah, it's a bit rough, but not sucking bad. Kinda funny and serious too.

You're just twiddling words; you know what I mean. But for the record, love is not the opposite of hate, sensibility is. Again, you're trifuling with some petty point and ignoring the poem.

None at the moment, but thank you for asking.

The only thing zodiac is right about is that they will nag like old women until you become bored.

DA will be pleased. Receive your reward.

I did not say that an open mind is better at receiving truth than one that uses a model to understand the world. I said that truth is something which can be picked up by an open mind and deflected by a closed one. If you wish to argue with me please argue with me and not with some straw falsity of what I say. I also did not say that having a model of the world is closed minded. I said that the important thing here is to be receptive to truth, even if comes through an unlikely source. Models are useful and not closed minded. What you are really doing here is avoiding the second paragraph in my comment because it defeats your original statement.

"surely I've kept my heart pure" The "in vain" means nothing til I stop laughing about that one.

Crap, crap, crap. Here's your constructive criticism: 1) I'd recomment shutting up about proving yourself correct. The reader's likely to think you're a little self-righteous snit. 2) The reader might get a little lost when you leap from -=Dark_Angel=-,P.I.'s comment to him thinking he's God, as calling things bollocks isn't something most people usually think of God as doing. 3) That intellectual capacity thing is crap. For another thing, you know it's not very cogent. And anyway -=Dark_Angel=-,P.I. can argue, reason, communicate in English, type, and do anything else related to posting comments about other people's "unbelievable waffle" better than any Ethiopian, child or not. If you attempt to argue about this, you will be more than usually talking out of your ass. 4) But hey, great title! Hey, people are populous, what a concept!!!! tchuss, zodiac

From what sexual position are you speaking?

Which part do you think is funny, "surely I've kept my heart pure" or "surely in vain"? I think they're both fucking balls to the wall.

Dear Christ this is a load of garbage. In fact, I can't find a single sentence with any sort of correctness to it except possibly "what seems to you, simply is not" (which, to be fair, I can't make enough of to figure out whether it's crap or not. Judging from how things are going, I'd guess crap.) To wit, 1) Language can't be misused to justify reality. For one reality doesn't require justification. For another, language can be defined as "a system of sounds or characters designed for representing reality", so anything language does in the area of reality is pretty much right. For another, what the fuck are you talking about? Certainly not richa's comment. I propose it's you who are clothesminded. End of story. 2) Truth is misinterpreted all the time. For example: 'The sky is blue' is true. 'The sky is blue because God painted it blue' is a misinterpretation. 3) Truth is probably never really communicated (or if it is - ie, 'God exists' - it's pretty much totally at random). Ergo, being properly communicated has nothing to do with it. 4) Oh, you're talking about justifying false reality! Well, that's a bow'ls argument isn't it, and tantamount to saying well it doesn't justify MY reality. Judging from your comments, your reality is bunk. 5) Um, God told Adam first thing not to eat the fruit of the apple tree, without their having seen it prior. So you just failed big time. 6) And so on and so on. This is such crap it makes my eyes water. Please don't ever try to argue here ever again. cheers, zodiac

This whole comment is simply awful.

Love IS the word if you believe "love uranium 238" is the opposite of "hate uranium 238".