Help | About | Suggestions | Alms | Chat [0] | Users [0] | Log In | Join
 Search:
Poem: Submit | Random | Best | Worst | Recent | Comments   

The dancers (Free verse) by richa
I can see a henge and its stone circle of bodies, some still, some imitating the steps of a young dancer slowly retracing and then collapsing under gravity, then finding their feet again. I could see ghosts live among us colliding in the planes forged in air wandering into us, placing their hands on ours in much the same way as they. I can see them dancing again imitating shapes like a young dancer.

Up the ladder: The Box
Down the ladder: Natural Remedy

You must be logged in to leave comments. Vote:

Votes: (green: user, blue: anonymous)
 GraphVotes
10  .. 10
.. 20
.. 20
.. 00
.. 00
.. 00
.. 00
.. 00
.. 00
.. 00
.. 00

Arithmetic Mean: 8.8
Weighted score: 5.452971
Overall Rank: 2906
Posted: January 10, 2007 12:19 PM PST; Last modified: January 10, 2007 2:35 PM PST
View voting details
Comments:
[n/a] -=Dark_Angel=-, P.I. @ 80.47.198.114 | 10-Jan-07/4:02 PM | Reply
A good try!
[n/a] Stephen Robins @ 213.146.148.199 > -=Dark_Angel=-, P.I. | 11-Jan-07/7:04 AM | Reply
Were you friends with that much loved ethnic Aqib Kadar?
[n/a] -=Dark_Angel=-, P.I. @ 217.36.49.166 > Stephen Robins | 11-Jan-07/7:52 AM | Reply
Don't know him.
[n/a] Stephen Robins @ 213.146.148.199 > -=Dark_Angel=-, P.I. | 11-Jan-07/7:16 AM | Reply
and does this link give you a picture of burgers? he looks like he's lost weight: http://www.rgshw.com/oldboys/index2_nj.php?content=dinner_06/dinner.htm
[n/a] -=Dark_Angel=-, P.I. @ 217.36.49.166 > Stephen Robins | 11-Jan-07/8:01 AM | Reply
Alexander Horsfall_Turner. Left column, 8th picture down. Sadly the years have not been kind to his cheeks; they've lost much of their former lustre.
[n/a] Stephen Robins @ 213.146.148.199 > -=Dark_Angel=-, P.I. | 11-Jan-07/8:06 AM | Reply
He is sporting a terrible tie, quite probably from Next and a shint suit. Looks like he ploughs his furrow in recruitment consultancy or estate agency.
[n/a] -=Dark_Angel=-, P.I. @ 217.36.49.166 > Stephen Robins | 11-Jan-07/9:23 AM | Reply
Only Gieves & Hawkes will do for me. A man should change his tailor less often than he changes his wife. That said, Hunstman are a solid breed, as are Kilgour (if a little too contemporary for my excellent tastes). Where do you shoppe?
[n/a] Stephen Robins @ 213.146.148.199 > -=Dark_Angel=-, P.I. | 12-Jan-07/12:54 AM | Reply
Dege and Skinner do a splendid line in weekend wear, hunting pinks and two button, three piece suits with double venting. Suit with one or less vents are as good as a collossal tattoo on one's for'ed stating CUNT. Shirts are by Emmett and formal wear by Favourbrook of Jermyn Street. I trust you don't buy off the peg, Thieves and Hawkes have gone down hill a bit since they were taken over by some people from Hong Kong, started trying to attract the noveau rich, some of their suits look like they belong in Oswald Boateng's shop, and he's a darkie.

On a seperate matter, why is it always the deeply unpopular people from school who attend reunions and dinner functions? Obviously in Burgers case it was a self serving opportunity to show off his reduced cheeks and explain how tremendously succesful he is selling mobile telephony equipment at phones 4 U.
[n/a] -=Dark_Angel=-, P.I. @ 217.36.49.166 > Stephen Robins | 12-Jan-07/1:57 AM | Reply
The single vent is an American abumination. I also hate 3 button suits, anyone who has a really fat tie knot, fused canvas, garish two-tone linings, and shirts with massive cuffs and massive collars.

I've only bought a Gieves & Hawkes personal tailored suit, which is still under construction (grey with very subtle pin stripe, 2 button, slightly angled pockets, no belt-loops, Cambridge Blue lining). Once my excellent tastes have reached some sort of equilibrium, it's time for fully bespoke.

My weekend wear looks something like this:

http://www.moviemaze.de/media/wallpaper/2033/goldfinger.html
[n/a] Stephen Robins @ 213.146.148.199 > -=Dark_Angel=-, P.I. | 12-Jan-07/2:44 AM | Reply
Sounds tremendously tasteful; I trust you went to the Row rather than their Chelsea outfit which seems to be entirely staffed by ethnics. There is nothing worse than a garish pinstripe. Except perhaps these young gentleman's attire:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/cbbcnews/hi/pictures/galleries/newsid_3497000/3497279.stm

Of a weekend I usually wear this sort of outfit:

http://www.harristweedshop.com/breeches.html

The outfit on the right being for casual frolicking on the estate whereas I wear this for church:

http://www.harristweedshop.com/traditional-suit.html

I have interviewed a number of people lately who don't have the advantages afforded by a private education who seem to think it is "ok" to turn up to an interview with a tie knot the size of Anglesey and the shape of a Rhombus, their hair suffused in all manner of products and shoes coated in metal (not a gentleman's snaffle). I really do feel that "street culture" is in danger of overwhelming the good sense of sporting a pair of red moleskins when in town.
[n/a] -=Dark_Angel=-, P.I. @ 217.36.49.166 > Stephen Robins | 12-Jan-07/8:12 AM | Reply
Of course it was from the Row. Just got back from there, as it happens. Took an absurdly long lunch break (my colleague was having a fitting done at Hunstman), but was appalled when the waiter informed me: "Chef is not happy with the foie gras today. Would Sir like to select another item from the menu?"
[n/a] Stephen Robins @ 213.146.148.199 > -=Dark_Angel=-, P.I. | 12-Jan-07/8:20 AM | Reply
I hope you kicked his face off. I thought chinos and a shirt with a pocket was order of the day in IT?

Huntsman do a nice one button suit and have an excellent range of house tweeds.

[n/a] -=Dark_Angel=-, P.I. @ 217.36.49.166 > Stephen Robins | 12-Jan-07/8:26 AM | Reply
I don't work in IT.

We quizzed Hunstman about their penchant for the single button: apparently, you can place a single button at exactly the right place, so when you button up the jacket it is perfectly balanced. With two buttons, you inevitably end up with the top one slightly too high.
[n/a] Stephen Robins @ 213.146.148.199 > -=Dark_Angel=-, P.I. | 12-Jan-07/8:58 AM | Reply
That is, of course, genius. I should imagine you feel pretty silly buying a two button suit now. I have just torn the top button off my suit. It doesn't look perfectly balanced but hangs rather limply over the edge of my wheeled chair.

Are you the -=Dark_Angel=-, P.I. with personality? and the other one is the I.T. geek. I can only assume you work in a gentleman's profession such as hedge funds or private equity.
[n/a] richa @ 81.178.91.116 > -=Dark_Angel=-, P.I. | 13-Jan-07/2:13 PM | Reply
Bless you.:)
[8] Shuushin @ 63.167.136.250 | 11-Jan-07/10:55 AM | Reply
wondering at the "I can see"s and the "I could see"

seems unnecessary.

and "under gravity" as is, doesn't provide much value, does it? Some beefier description of how the gravity works upon the dancer/stone. mebbe just a modifier for gravity; I don't know. "and then/[some simile of gravity], collapsing"/"then finding their feet"

still, I like it alot.
[9] Dovina @ 75.82.85.162 | 11-Jan-07/11:15 AM | Reply
A nice comparison and even a bit emotional, for which you should be ashamed.

"they." in S5 seems abrupt, as if something's missing.
[9] LilMsLadyPoet @ 152.163.100.65 | 11-Jan-07/8:29 PM | Reply
'in much the same way as they' needed tweaking, in my opinion.
Wonderful, magical picture painted here...and so clearly, about an illusive subject. If you were a photographer you would have captured it on film. Very good!
263 view(s)




Track and Plan your submissions ; Read some Comics ; Get Paid for your Poetry
PoemRanker Copyright © 2001 - 2024 - kaolin fire - All Rights Reserved
All poems Copyright © their respective authors
An internet tradition since June 9, 2001