Help | About | Suggestions | Alms | Chat [0] | Users [0] | Log In | Join
 Search:
Poem: Submit | Random | Best | Worst | Recent | Comments   

Freud Spoke Of A Mother's Tongue, But I Interpret Dreams (Free verse) by Ranger
Every image is disguised under normal circumstances- Now, to be extraordinary Sleep must fall like ash -blot the sky And then a strange medicine will arise, blind and blessed As if a clock-face were some lunar arc -her name is Celeste The secret is in words which murmur; while lying, prone to doubling up lithe, nearly unconscious long slumber as smoke from a gun, placed by the hip - not eyes - in grace Pupils closed, to cite... ...owl, owl of agony with a dark stare which winds upwards Owl with butterfly wings Peacock left, a gatekeeper's right To close beneath the night gale's whispering Why so soundless, vision, when carrying this message of loss? A song would be appropriate for a night bird flying Danger soaring past the scene Past walls, God, scent, Past jasmine... Awakening is like the new flame Flicker uncertainly Unconvinced Yet the owl spoke true- She left me that day

Up the ladder: Dressing up
Down the ladder: Russian Space Station

You must be logged in to leave comments. Vote:

Votes: (green: user, blue: anonymous)
 GraphVotes
10  .. 40
.. 21
.. 00
.. 20
.. 00
.. 00
.. 10
.. 00
.. 00
.. 10
.. 00

Arithmetic Mean: 7.818182
Weighted score: 6.409091
Overall Rank: 761
Posted: April 28, 2006 1:06 PM PDT; Last modified: April 28, 2006 4:07 PM PDT
View voting details
The following users have marked this poem on their favorites list:

MacFrantic

Comments:
[7] Dovina @ 70.38.78.229 | 28-Apr-06/3:19 PM | Reply
Freud spoke of the speech of our mother-tongue as being guarded against forgetting. But it also succumbs to another disturbance, familiar to us as "slips of the tongue." I think you are relating slips of the tongue to dreams and the interpretation of both. But frankly, it's not clear to me.

You are avoiding commas at the ends of lines, maybe because you said my last one had too many of them. In general, I think punctuation is appropriate on a poem of this complexity, including commas as needed for grammar at the ends of lines. The first two lines threw me for awhile. I would change them to:

Every image is disguised under normal circumstances.
Now, to be extraordinary,

Another nit: "lithe, nearly unconscious,"
[n/a] Ranger @ 62.252.32.15 > Dovina | 28-Apr-06/3:30 PM | Reply
Umm, well I was referring to the idea of the subconscious being entirely a language. Hence, dreams are not images, the pictures are merely what we create afterwards as a memory of a dream. He also thought we didn't hear in dreams, which, from experience, is bollocks.
Slips of the tongue doesn't feature here. On one level it's about his theory that dreams, when from the language of the subconscious, are often based on puns rather than direct signifier/signified relations. Therefore the words are 'doubling up', 'near unconscious langue'. And there are others in there too.

Question: did you find this written from the point of view of the therapist or from the point of view of the dreamer?

Will have a comb through the punctuation.
[7] Dovina @ 70.38.78.229 > Ranger | 28-Apr-06/3:40 PM | Reply
"Did you find this written from the point of view of the therapist or from the point of view of the dreamer?"

I took it as a dream interpreter's POV who could also be the dreamer. The title is confusing because of mixing past and present tenses.

Qustion: If dreams are based on puns, why not consider the "slip of the tongue" feature of a persons mother tongue, especially since you mention it in the title?
[n/a] Ranger @ 62.252.32.15 > Dovina | 28-Apr-06/4:05 PM | Reply
I struggled with the title a little. I wanted to incorporate the Oedipal ideas with the mother tongue (being our subconscious language rather than our conscious native language). I was also trying to fit both interpretations of the poem into the title - therefore it is supposed to show both a hypno-psychoanalytic approach to working out the meaning of the dream, which ends up with the patient walking out on the analyst (mirroring the 'Dora' case), and also the dreamer discovering that the interpretation of their dream was accurate. Maybe I should change the title to 'Freud Spoke Of A Mother's Tongue, But I Interpret Dreams'. That might make it clearer.
R.E. slips of the tongue - they are addressed even though they don't feature too prominently. It's in stanza 2.
Many thanks again for commenting, my writing's in a pretty dire state at the moment and I need the help getting back on track.
[7] Dovina @ 70.38.78.229 > Ranger | 28-Apr-06/4:42 PM | Reply
Your writing is not in a "pretty dire state." But, like I said about your last one, I think you are again trying to accomplish more than a reasonable amount in this poem. If your readers already know these concepts, then you might succeed with them in providing entertainment and new expressions. But for us non-phychologists, any one of those concepts would be a good chunk to deliver in a poem of this length. I am an admittedly simple reader, and others may be able to take all you want to deliver.
[n/a] lmp @ 141.154.134.3 | 28-Apr-06/3:28 PM | Reply
hmmm, well. this is another complex read. alas, being friday afternoon and i am on my way home for the weekend, i cannot sit tight enough to think nor read clearly. i will try to get back and comment on this. holding off the vote for now as well. musn't be hasty, now!
[n/a] Ranger @ 62.252.32.15 > lmp | 28-Apr-06/3:45 PM | Reply
Heh, fair enough. Somehow I seem to write best on a friday, I think it's due to actually having to apply my brain to thinking as opposed to the rest of the week. I tried to keep this fairly comprehensible; I am really struggling to write 'simple' (i.e. readable) poetry at the moment so all I am left with is experimental stuff. If it makes it any clearer, I really did dream of that owl with its butterfly wings.
Hope to catch you over the weekend sometime, finally the ranker participation is starting to pick up again and things look promising. All we need now is ALChemy back and poemranker will be its usual self!
[10] MacFrantic @ 172.191.74.95 | 28-Apr-06/8:00 PM | Reply
This is definitely a poet's poem. I feel confident enough when I say that this may be the best pure poem on this site. It is catchy, raw, truly FREE verse. It even has the punch at the end that makes your eyes move back to the top and start over again. No matter what the scores on this poem, it deserves no less than a primary addition to my favorites. Of course, Ranger, nothing short of greatness should be expected from you. I hope I've tooted your horn quite sufficiently.
*10*
[7] amanda_dcosta @ 203.145.159.37 | 29-Apr-06/11:48 AM | Reply
Ranger, This is yet another piece where you've got me racking my brains. Making us exercise, aren't you? :-) Am enjoying it.

Somehow you and my husband will be able to get along well with topics like this. Probably he'll be able to give you a valid critique on this.

From my point of view, I don't seem to be getting anywhere far with this. It ain't particulary clear.
[n/a] Ranger @ 62.252.32.15 > amanda_dcosta | 29-Apr-06/11:59 AM | Reply
Well I'm glad that you're enjoying the challenge; I've struggled to write anything vaguely meaningful recently so I resorted to 'clever' stuff instead. The problem being, as I've discovered, that it's virtually impossible to communicate ideas like this poetically without the reader having background knowledge of the themes. As far as Freud goes, I know very little. However, it's all about puns.

For my next act I have a poem which you might find more to your tastes. How up to date are you with this 'gospel of Judas'? You'll be more interested in my next submission, methinks.
[7] amanda_dcosta @ 203.145.159.37 | 29-Apr-06/12:06 PM | Reply
Ranger.... care to chat?
[n/a] Ranger @ 62.252.32.15 > amanda_dcosta | 29-Apr-06/12:11 PM | Reply
Shamefully I don't have the chat function operational (plus I have to go out fairly soon) however I will try to get it running for the next time you're about - I have plenty of questions about your take on religion (and not the usual critical questions either, I'm sure you'll be relieved to hear!) It might be useful for poem explanations too.
How are things these days anyway? And have you seen ALChemy recently?
[7] amanda_dcosta @ 203.145.159.44 > Ranger | 29-Apr-06/12:24 PM | Reply
Alchemy ... no. I wish I had his e-mail.

And chat. this is something that PR's rarely make use of. Otherwise it would be more fun to log in together and have a hearty debate. Is there much problem to logging in to chat?
I never seem to have any trouble.

As for ' Gospel of Judas", I have my opinins.... strong ones against it.... but depends what you write. Would love to see it though.


[7] amanda_dcosta @ 203.145.159.44 > amanda_dcosta | 29-Apr-06/12:26 PM | Reply
It's 1.00 a.m., 30th April, here in India. I'd better sign off soon. Good night.
[n/a] Ranger @ 62.252.32.15 > amanda_dcosta | 29-Apr-06/12:35 PM | Reply
You know, one day I intend to be able to say "It's 1.00 am, here in India". It has a more exotic ring to it that "It's 8.30 pm here in Wales"...
[n/a] Ranger @ 62.252.32.15 > amanda_dcosta | 29-Apr-06/12:32 PM | Reply
Well I'm technologically about as useful as a dead lemur so it's no surprise to me that despite doing everything kaolin tells me to it doesn't work. I've probably turned off something vitally important along the way. No matter, I shall get it sorted asap - the chat function would be a good place to congregate, for sure.

The poem I wrote is (in keeping with my recent preferences) epically ambiguous. I'd like to think that people will read it and end up thinking 'he is totally for it' or 'he is totally against it', but what I'm afraid will happen is that people will finish it thinking 'what is he going on about?' I shall withold my actual ideas about it until after I've posted, and probably until I get the chat working.

Righto, now I have to depart for a while, I'll catch you if you're still about later, if not, tomorrow!
[7] Dovina @ 12.72.34.28 > Ranger | 29-Apr-06/6:53 PM | Reply
Regarding Chat: Are you using Internet Explorer, Versioin 6.0, sp2? If so, I believe there is no way to set it up so Chat will work. If someone can tell me otherwise, I'll listen and try, but I have done everything Kaolin said, and a lot more. The only solution I have found is to use Netscape 7.0.
[10] deleted user @ 64.140.228.180 | 29-Apr-06/4:05 PM | Reply
This is good stuff. Not exactly my cup of tea, but doesn't mean I shouldn't give it the score it deserves.
[9] Wakeboarder20 @ 71.227.248.140 | 30-Apr-06/12:11 AM | Reply
I can safely say I have no idea what this poem is about. That being said though the imagery is amazing. So even if I was completely lost almost instantly, I still enjoyed every line I read. Great job.
[10] Niphredil @ 85.130.147.248 | 1-May-06/2:29 PM | Reply
First read:
I read the comments concerning therapists and patients, but I never associated the poem with either; they're far too mundane. This poem is a dream; and I read it just as though I were waking up, trying to piece together bits and pieces of an idea which was blindingly clear just the instant before I awoke. All I can recall at this moment are scattered pictures; flickering memories; a swoop in the distance. And she left me.

Second read:
I can see the dream interpretation theme in the first verse, particularly in the first line of every stanza. It would seem as though the first line describes a reality, and the following lines the dream. They could, in fact, be read separately and still make sense.

I did however enjoy the puns, although I seriously doubt I figured them all out, though. And of course, your trademark ;-)

Solid 10 for a indecently beautiful piece of work. I love a poem that makes me think. But beware of loading your stuff down with too many underlying meanings; you might be too subtle for the rest of us. :-)
[n/a] Ranger @ 62.252.32.15 > Niphredil | 1-May-06/2:52 PM | Reply
Thanks =D what you said about the first lines being more real than what follows them is spot on; same about the waking bit. Although I remembered the dream almost in its entirety, the owl was just a fragment (although the most important fragment) of a decidedly strange experience.
Just got your email - I'll reply asap but am also stuck in academia (damn essays) so it may take a little while...glad you liked the story too!
[9] LilMsLadyPoet @ 64.12.116.14 | 24-May-06/4:24 PM | Reply
The first two lines need punctuation change...kinda stumbled there....Other than that, complex piece here...or you could just read it as association, free-thought/dream piece...either way I think it should appeal to most reading it. Good imagery! An owl with butterfly wings...I like trying to conjure that image.
[9] LilMsLadyPoet @ 64.12.116.13 > LilMsLadyPoet | 24-May-06/4:25 PM | Reply
Wow...alot of conversation about this one...interesting to read comments!
[n/a] Ranger @ 62.252.32.15 > LilMsLadyPoet | 1-Jun-06/5:48 AM | Reply
Cheers, it's good to see you about again!
[9] LilMsLadyPoet @ 64.12.116.10 > Ranger | 6-Jun-06/3:17 PM | Reply
Cheers!
[4] Edna Sweetlove @ 81.179.231.241 | 25-May-06/8:24 AM | Reply
I gave a metaphorical 'owl of agony as I read this.
[n/a] Ranger @ 62.252.32.15 > Edna Sweetlove | 1-Jun-06/5:50 AM | Reply
That would be your haemorrhoids crawling up your throat and out of your mouth.
[10] A db C @ 217.40.63.105 | 11-Aug-06/6:30 AM | Reply
sophisticated
[n/a] Ranger @ 86.131.57.119 > A db C | 12-Aug-06/1:05 AM | Reply
Thank you :-)
321 view(s)




Track and Plan your submissions ; Read some Comics ; Get Paid for your Poetry
PoemRanker Copyright © 2001 - 2024 - kaolin fire - All Rights Reserved
All poems Copyright © their respective authors
An internet tradition since June 9, 2001