Free verse № 136195
The Forgetting
He stooped to smell a rose,
the same heâd smelled all morning.
Inner child not inner any more,
he tasted everything newâ
delicious oblivion.
Eternal pasteless now.
an internet tradition since June 9, 2001.
Free verse № 136195
37 comments
quaint and lovely nonetheless, it stimulates conjecture.
Or it's when you're simply speachless. When you're stuck for words.
"their" is another one. I always want to spell it as "thier". It's not that I see words backwords or jumbled anymore. I just sometimes remember them mixed up. So reading isn't hard for me although it's probably a little slower but writing is a bit harder. One of the reasons I started writing poetry was for practice.
Isn't it a form of pastel? Without pastels? without color?
Unable to paste? without paste?
LOL....Microsoft Word and my standard dictionary does not have such a word as pasteless.
http://www.newyorker.com/printables/fact
Dovina: Not so. I changed pastless to pasteless. It's an allusion.
ZODIAC: The title, central image, and 95% of the words aren't yours.
DOVINA: I'm an illusion.
ZODIAC: I don't have time for this. You've been warned. Again.
"The Forgetting"
"you stoop to smell a rose,"
"the same rose" "that you've been stooping to smell" "all morning" ...
"delicious in oblivion"
"eternal, pastless Now"
No, "he tasted everything new" isn't in the article. But it's not grammatical either. Take credit for it if you like.
Look, I'm really, really, REALLY not looking to give you a hard time. The only reason I know about the article is that I was looking up a poem I remembered with the narrator stooping to smell a rose (Edmund Waller, maybe?) to congratulate you on referencing it. Let's let the readers decide for themselves. I'd personally like to believe you read New Yorker, The Guardian, or obscure neurology texts.
If you read the aboveposted text years ago, forgot it, and then rewrote it, that's still plagiarism, albeit obviously accidental plagiarism. There are myriad cases of similar things happening.
If you've somehow independently written this without ANY prior experience with the text, I'm sorry I said you were a plagiarist. For what that's worth. In either event, it would obviously still be a good idea, if not your responsibility, to rewrite or withdraw your version.
Yes, the fact that you've based your poem on a wordplay on a not-exactly-familiar phrase, "eternal pastless now", made me think you were thinking of some original phrase or text you knew. I cannot see how you'd think "eternal pasteless now" was clever or worthwhile otherwise.
Again, I'm sorry about this whole thing. I didn't wake up this beautiful snowy Alaska morning thinking I was going to be mean to you. I'd like to start being nice to you now, so maybe it's best we let this whole thing go for today.
Log in to add a comment.