Dovina
on An Allegory to No One by MacFrantic
28 Oct 2005, 9:33 AM
How can you reveal this? And suburban conopy doesn't work for me. "Loud foreign things" does.
I watched a fat-assed man leaving once and told him to turn around so I could kick something tiny.
I try that sometimes but all that pops into my mind is "titties".
I prefer a girl with nice big titties and an ugly ass as opposed to a fine ass.
That way when she finally walks out on you, you don't mind seeing her sorry ass go.
damn. you guys is crazy.
Very tender, especially the "honest baby" lines.
Logistically impossible.
Great. But unless she has Size 12 feet, try 6" heels. And we don't need the opening remark.
Or this.
Q: Please describe the mechanism that intelligent design proposes for how complex biological structures arose.
A: Well, the word "mechanism" can be used in many ways. ... When I was referring to intelligent design, I meant that we can perceive that in the process by which a complex biological structure arose, we can infer that intelligence was involved...
Q: What is the mechanism that intelligent design proposes?
A: And I wonder, could—am I permitted to know what I replied to your question the first time?
Q: I don't think I got a reply, so I'm asking you. You've made this claim here (reading): "Intelligent design theory focuses exclusively on the proposed mechanism of how complex biological structures arose." And I want to know, what is the mechanism that intelligent design proposes for how complex biological structures arose?
A: Again, it does not propose a mechanism in the sense of a step-by-step description of how those structures arose. But it can infer that in the mechanism, in the process by which these structures arose, an intelligent cause was involved.
- Intelligent Design proponent Michael Behe being questioned at evolution vs Intelligent Design hearings in Pennsylvania
Is your name really JonathRon? How odd. It's like you're a science fiction character.
Stalactites hang down.
No, the aboveposted message means you misused the word "blatant" in your poem. Now in your comment, too. Twice. The symbols aren't all bad.
beautiful one
clusterfuck. heh. thanks for the laugh.
Gives new meaning to the term "Cluster fuck".
First the moon now the stars is there a term for this type of sexual preference? Cosmosexual? Celestialphile?
Astro-erotica?
Nice juicy stuff you're writing.
http://www.phoenix5.org/humor/WhosOnFirstAudio.mp3
This pretty much sums it up.
thank you for the clarification, which one hangs down and which builds up?
thank you, i would hope a poem about sculpture would offer that.
any in particular you enjoyed more than others?
sorry to disappoint, but perhaps i was looking for more of a tie back to the beginning rather than a climax. this seems to be a(problem?) theme in the writing i hae done lately. any suggestions?
thank you for the clarification, i do think my use of symbols is blatant (guns, genatalia, etc.)in some cases; people often get upset about it, but i suppose the symbol itslef is not blatant, just my use of it... thank you again.