Re: a comment on =, <>, & . . . by Dovina	2-Mar-06/3:50 PM
1A because with only me and 199 of my friends left in the US, admit it, the country would be a lot better off.
Re: a comment on There by Dovina	2-Mar-06/3:46 PM
After you've made it there, made it to hell, and retrieved the woody, take a good hard look at your life and ask yourself if maybe there was another prayer you would rather have God answer than, "God I'm going to hell for that one."
Re: Under the Spoon by MacFrantic	2-Mar-06/3:37 PM
I like it, except for the Alligator. It's light, humorous, and humerus. (Hey, you can have that free.) Smooth up the flow a bit and go.
Re: a comment on =, <>, & . . . by Dovina	2-Mar-06/8:33 AM
Very profound. We could carry on a long conversation like this.
Re: a comment on =, <>, & . . . by Dovina	2-Mar-06/8:31 AM
Oh well, it was a stab in the dark, so to speak.
Re: a comment on =, <>, & . . . by Dovina	2-Mar-06/8:18 AM
I can, but I won't say. We have impressionable children here who could be led into sin. My next poem is entitled "The Private Life of an Alchemist."
Re: a comment on =, <>, & . . . by Dovina	2-Mar-06/8:11 AM
Give yourself some more harsh criticism. But thanks for the 10, I need a lotta help here.
Re: a comment on A Failed Proposition Under The Night Sky by Ranger	2-Mar-06/7:48 AM
Ranger, you can visualize him right now slapping himself with harsh criticism, bleeding about the head and shouolders for his Freudian Irrestibility - the insatiable inability to resist saying the first phallic-symoled thing on his mind.
Re: a comment on =, <>, & . . . by Dovina	2-Mar-06/7:34 AM
Actually, yes. Admittedly it's weird, but for me it has meaning.
Re: a comment on A Failed Proposition Under The Night Sky by Ranger	1-Mar-06/4:47 PM
Ranger will be appalled, won't he?
Re: a comment on There by Dovina	1-Mar-06/4:44 PM
You probably told her that God can't make plastic. And she probably said He can, just ask Dovina. And you probably said Dovina is is unqualified to say. And she probably said, "Dovina has a plastic crucifix." So take that an admit to being ovulated.
Re: a comment on You Sang To Me In A Cathedral Chamber by Ranger	1-Mar-06/4:41 PM
with you, the force is. But of the dark side beware. Angels dark, that is.
Re: A Failed Proposition Under The Night Sky by Ranger	1-Mar-06/4:38 PM
The title is very appealing, but the delivery? - well. He is apparently like Atlas, has his own telescope, but unlike telescopes, his is not a receiver of light, but a beacon lit. "Thin gold ring"? - brass maybe. Cocerels are young male chickens, which do not crow like the roosters they become. Still, the astronomer dying at dawn is a good image, which perhaps you can build upon.
Re: a comment on You Sang To Me In A Cathedral Chamber by Ranger	1-Mar-06/4:25 PM
An un-Yodaesque comment that is.
Re: a comment on There by Dovina	1-Mar-06/4:23 PM
I did that years ago, almost in a former life, by lying in the sand at Long Beach. No, face it, all is vanity. There is nothing new under the sun.
Re: a comment on There by Dovina	1-Mar-06/4:17 PM
Having arrived at the ultimate meaning for your life, may I suggest giving up. Yes, admit that amanda_dcosta was right all along.
Re: Pine Boxes (revised) by Joe-joe	1-Mar-06/10:45 AM
Don't you mean "reign" in line 2? And why add "supreme"? Am I repeating myself?
Re: a comment on There by Dovina	1-Mar-06/10:43 AM
But I did that yesterday.
Re: a comment on There by Dovina	1-Mar-06/10:34 AM
I did that, had a drink, then took one horribly disappointing step in the direction of Robert Frost.
Re: a comment on There by Dovina	1-Mar-06/10:33 AM
There's a child there, alright. I see her in the distance, unable to stand or feed herself. No, really, I see your point. Thanks.