cyan9
replying on Beneath the Willow Tree by cyan9
16 Nov 2005, 9:15 AM
Still fail to what? make sense? I guess that you mean that I fail to set you off, should that be the case, I think you should get back to the other kids in the nursery before I do something to really set you off. Although, maybe you can't go back there because they all think your as much of a muppet as I do.
And yet you still fail to.
Zodiac, petty insults aside, if you are going to read and comment, I have noticed that you seem to start from the assumption that a piece of work is some kind of clone or lifeless colation of words in order to imitate something. I would encourage you to read the piece as a scene unfolding and attempt to enjoy that scene, rather than likening it to something else.
It doesn't take a lot to set you off then
I'm sure with a slightly more intelligence you may be able to unravel its meaning.
If you are going to leave feedback like this on my work, please save your energy, it shows quite a degree of disregard and emotional underdevelopement to see it as a dictionary of words rather than to view and experience the sensations of the scene unfolding. As for being formatted by a post-prime Billy Corgan, this is of no value or use, and looks like you are trying to sound more intelligent than you are. I appreciate the fact that you are giving by commenting and rating poems (which is one better than most people) but please have a think about what you are giving. This comment has served no use to me, and has caused very mild offense, what was the point?
Grasshopper finally snatches a pebble from the master's hand.
I was thinking mockery:
"No nothing like." A very poor sentence, I'm geussing without education.
No but that's fucking hilarious.
Shit! You'll have to copy and paste into your addrees bar and enter it. The link don't work.
Now I remember why I didn't bother seeing it again. They might as well have just turned to the audiance and flipped us the bird.
This reminds me of a joke. It's near the bottom of the page at this link. It's called The pink and purple polka dotted ping pong ball. You'll recognize it as a big block of text. Make sure you read every word of it slowly and carefully. Enjoy.
http://www.circleofbastards.com/cgi-bin/
Yes, but most of your questions have answers, and most of those answers are either yes or no. To name a few others,
Q: Where have equality slipped off to?
A: It was never here. You've been taken by an equality impersonator with a bad accent.
Q: Did you ever hear me cry?
A: No. And I don't want to. Stop that right now, mister.
Q: Did the Angel knock upon your door?
A: If it did, I was in the shower.
Q: Did they carry you away?
A: Who? Weren't you talking about one angel? Um, no.
Q: When you looked into their eyes did they option you to stay?
A: No. Nice grammar though.
Q: What did I do to make them take you from me?
A: You have to believe in them to make them come, usually accompanied by saying 'Angel, Angel, Angel' in a mirror at exactly midnight. Buying an Angel tv-show box-set does it too.
Q: When did you walk away?
A: Easy. Right before I wasn't there any more. Time to move on.
What I'm trying to say is that people read poems be spoonfed answers, or to check their answers against someone else's. If I ever did think of a question I thought had no answer, I'd avoid putting it in a poem, for fear some reader who knew the answer would think I was kind of dumb. You can't say I'm not talking about your poems.
Was it a play on gizzing? I already missed it.
This is an easy one Zodiac.
I don't want to ruin it for you if you honestly don't remember, but it's worth watching again if just for the line "Why can't we just die, mommy?" and the part where Mimi says to Dave Duchovny "So I guess I don't get into heaven" and Dave's ghost says "No, guess not" and that's the end.
At least I guessed how to correctly spell guessing. You're right, I'm not putting any thought into this.