I dont blow anybody with a henna tattoo of father christmas on there cock

Yeah, well how about most people haven't been "deprived of consciousness", so your "point" is irrelevant? And how about you're making the bunko assumption that having a personality depends on being conscious?

"Anyway there is an argument to say that differences in intelligence are only as relevant as differences in hair curliness. That is to say the purpose of evolution is to create a fit with the evolutionary environment." Yes well that might be relevant if the coloureds had stayed in their own country, mightn't it? But, they made the choice to enter the fast-paced world of Civilised-society. Nobody forced them to come over here. And now look where we are: Coloured songs all over the radio like a sort of rash that you can't show the doctor because you're too embarrassed.

horus8, My comments were regarding my beliefs on a certain kind mindset of a particular type of human, this type of human comes in all ethnicities, so.... Silly human. meow, cat

dear richa, I'm below common, I'm a cat. I wish I was closer to common like you. Share some catnip. meow, cat

'If you attempt to argue that personality is a product of the soul, and not of the brain, then consider this: if you jab a pencil into someone's frontal lobes, their personality changes.' Yet more science-trite. How about someone is deprived of consciousness and only understands at the information processing level. How then does his personality change by jabbing his frontal lobe. Surely it is only his behaviour than can be said to change. Also why do you talk about soul and brain as though seperate entities?

'the fact is' makes you sound a dunce. The bell curve controversy was such fun wasn't it. They found out black peoples IQ's were a standard deviation lower than white peoples IQ's. And also that when you put a rag over a mongoloid babie face he was calm, do the same to a negroid and he has a hissy fit. Anyway there is an argument to say that differences in intelligence are only as relevant as differences in hair curliness. That is to say the purpose of evolution is to create a fit with the evolutionary environment.

I am afraid I don't have this thing you call common sense. I just have a dustbin full of a-levels. I wish I was common like you.

dear dark angel, p.i., Semantics is sort of the language equivalent of the "I'm not touching you." You know the little brother that puts his finger right in your face, but doesn't touch you, but it's not about the touching it's about your intent. It's like when you have a whole tirade on generalizing a particular group and you write 5000 words on it, but you preface it with "some"...as a sort "see I didn't mean all I meant some...I’m not generalizing…" It's a sort safety, a cowardly out, a false claim that you didn’t intend what you intended, even though you know and everyone else with common sense knows what you intended, but due to the rules of our language false people get to wiggle out of taking responsibility of their true intent, because of some grammatical rule like “some” or using the term “nigger”. meow, cat

What do people mean when they say that something "is simply semantics"?

It is a fact that white people are more likely to get skin cancer than black people. It is also a fact that black people are more likely to suffer from sickle cell anaemia than white people. It is also a fact that that white people tend to have straighter hair than black people. In fact it is obvious that there are a large number of physical characteristics associated with a person's race. The brain is a part of the body, just as the skin, or the blood, or the hair is. Why should it be any different? The fact is that there is no reason to think characteristics such as personality and intelligence aren't also influenced by race. Of course such characteristics are partly a product of an individual's environment, but there is no doubt that different brains would deal with the same environment in different ways. If you attempt to argue that personality is a product of the soul, and not of the brain, then consider this: if you jab a pencil into someone's frontal lobes, their personality changes. When it comes to racism, most people think it's wrong to generalise on the basis of race. They say things like "What you think has nothing to do with the colour of your skin". But that is the King of Generalisations. Is there any justification for it? It is perfectly conceivable that there could exist a race of people that were all evil and stupid. In conclusion, discriminating on the basis of race is only a stupid thing to do if your grounds for discrimination are unjustified. Thanks for listening.

jroday, while i understand what you are saying i don't agree (maybe I just don't agree with the whole theory, the whole chris rock think I don't agree). i don't believe in the two kinds of black people (or two kinds of any people) theory. it to me is semantics, a person who uses the term "nigger" or even "nigga" white, black or whatever, has a warped view. the black person who uses it feel that there is a certain behavior that will make the “mainstream” accept them, not understanding that person that thinks there are “two types of black people” aren't open and will never accept them or anyone else, it’s ignorant, uneducated, a power trip, but those people are few and far between. a white person who feels that there are two kinds of black people feels that most black people are “niggers” and the good ones they are black, they will even test black people to see if they are the black or “niggers”, you don’t test people you view as a peer or an equal, at least not in social situations. it's sort of like being Jewish and trying not to "act" Jewish so that mainstream America will accept you, people that will have a problem with you because of a stereotype are never going to like you anyway, during WW2 NAZI's didn't gas just the "bad" Jews, the rounded up even the people who didn’t go to temple. the "nigger", "nigga", "two types of black people" thing is simply semantics and someone trying to be clever, all people who use and believe in any of those three theories are pretty much in the same boat in my world. they always try to dance around and explain, but their are closed minded, unselfrealized people that need help. there are never just two types of any "group" there are a many types in groups as there are people... meow, cat

Yes cat there is a different between black people and niggers. webster dictionary 1962 edition said that a nigger was a black man from africa, I was born in the U.S.A.(smile). now in today's edition it says that a nigger is a nasty person with an atitude, so that could be anyone.(you wont find nigger in all webster's dictionarys, but if you research enough you'll fine it.)no iam not asking people to look at whites as individuals and assume black people think a certain way.everyone one is his or her own individual, and everyone think a certain way. It has nothing to do with the color of your skin.you must have misunderstood me when i said, the question is not always where we stand, but in which direction we are headed.what i meant by that is human beings by changing the inner attitudes of their minds, can change the outer aspects of their lives. if you can change your inner attitude you should be able to cope with anything.

"Because people who have nice jobs and healthy relationships don't respond to 3077 posts, do you know why, because they have a life, which you obviously do not," is the 9th Buncombe Dodge of the Invertebrate Lobster.

Blow me.

niggers believe in spending an enormous amount of money on useless shit, like for instance a 15,000 dollar muffler, on a 10, 000 dollar car, or a 400 dollar pair of shoes on a bad pedicure.. Also, I feel that niggers, somehow feel that if they are wearing a sport's jersey of some kind it makes them feel BETTER about they're invovment with the over paid essence of sports in America.

Yes, and I believe that we should begin with exposing the fact that Jeremi isn't black, and he is a racist. here, here.