DetailsThe poem, its numbers, and the conversation.

The Blood-Stained Body

Member since 2004 · Posted 13 May 2004 · 17 comments

something smells quite dead thoughts run through my head i see the blood-stained body the sheets are blood-stained red i try to leave the room most certain of my doom i see the blood-stained body ravaged, by the loom i peer into the sky i realize i am high i see the blood-stained body and i realize it is i

Rate it

0 is the worst, 10 the best. Pick a number, add a comment if you like, then send it. Keys: 0–9 pick, Enter sends.

mean 3.89 weighted 4.44 rank 12887 views 203 View voting details →

9 votes so far. Yours would make 10.9 votes so far

17 comments

[n/a] zodiac 13-May-04/8:59 AM Reply

"Could it be, as Rush Limbaugh mentioned in passing on a recent broadcast, that the perpetrators of the alleged crime are homosexuals? If that's the case, maybe the motivation for their activities was far different than from what has been discussed in the media's wall to wall coverage of this incident. If these individuals are homosexuals, maybe they were getting stimulated by looking at naked Iraqis in sexually provocative positions.

Of course, as Limbaugh said because of the military's "don't ask, don't tell" policy concerning homosexuality we'll probably never know the answer, but I think the scenario is still definitely worth considering.

After all, it would answer why the alleged activities took place and it would also provide a solution to the really bizarre question as to why pictures were taken of the humiliating and sexually suggestive poses.

Why, you ask? Many people believe that homosexuals have a much greater potential than heterosexuals to be sexual predators. In addition, a sizeable number of sexually dysfunctional individuals (aka sexual predators) take pictures of their illicit acts. It gives them an opportunity to glory in their "conquest" as they visually relive their sickening activities.

But here's an interesting scenario to ponder that Limbaugh also mentioned. If this was ever found out to be the case, what would those liberal defenders of homosexual marriage and "gay" rights do?

Would liberal Democrats have to adopt an different attitude to this situation and quit their incessant criticism of the Bush Administration and the liberation of Iraq? It's definitely something worth thinking about. After all, if the individuals involved in these alleged crimes were homosexual, or there was a homosexual element involved, who can blame them. They would just be acting out their natural biological inclinations, right? And (so the theory goes) who could fault them for that because their actions would have been a result of the way they were born, not in any way the volitional actions of a lifestyle choice."

[n/a] Phalkon › zodiac 13-May-04/9:10 AM Reply

eh?... and that has to do with...?

[n/a] zodiac › Phalkon 13-May-04/9:11 AM Reply

Well... you're gay, right?

[n/a] Phalkon › zodiac 13-May-04/4:52 PM Reply

ummm.... no, not at all... but i guess you asked because you want my number?

[n/a] zodiac › Phalkon 13-May-04/5:17 PM Reply

Oh God! I've made a terrible blunder! I have to go now...

[7] wilco › zodiac 13-May-04/2:00 PM Reply

The "liberal defenders of homosexual marriage and "gay" rights" would simply claim that there is a vast conspiracy perpetrated by the conservatives to make homosexuals out to be criminals in order to convince the public that they should all be burned at the stake.

[n/a] -=Dark_Angel=-, P.I. › zodiac 13-May-04/4:23 PM Reply

"But you could just say 'kleptomaniacs steal because they are just acting out their inclinations', or 'psychopaths kill because they are just acting out their inclinations', or 'homosexuals perform lewds because they are acting out their inclinations', and so on. The point isn't whether it's their 'fault' that they have such inclinations. The point is that the majority of 'normals' would rather live in a world with such people either behind bars, or being treated for being utterly mental. The difference between the 'liberals' and the 'conservatives' would probably be that the 'liberals' would ensnare the 'naughties' to (a) protect society, and (b) act as a deterrent. 'Conservatives' would ensnare them to (a) protect society, (b) act as a deterrent, and (c) punish them because of a thing called 'justice'."

[n/a] -=Dark_Angel=-, P.I. › -=Dark_Angel=-, P.I. 13-May-04/4:23 PM Reply

P.S bow'ls

[n/a] zodiac › -=Dark_Angel=-, P.I. 13-May-04/4:29 PM Reply

I'm quoting a famous conservative American pundit. Who are you quoting?

[n/a] -=Dark_Angel=-, P.I. › zodiac 13-May-04/4:33 PM Reply

Angela Lansbury

[n/a] -=Dark_Angel=-, P.I. › zodiac 13-May-04/4:31 PM Reply

Surely, though, it is true that bummers are more likely to be pervs. Homosexuality is a deviation from the sexual norm. And it is an elementary consequence of Bayes' theorem that, given someone deviates from the sexual norm, they are more likely to deviate from the sexual norm. In other words, they are more likely to be pervs.

[n/a] zodiac › -=Dark_Angel=-, P.I. 13-May-04/4:36 PM Reply

Bow'ls. I suppose you're the sexual norm.

[n/a] -=Dark_Angel=-, P.I. 13-May-04/9:31 AM Reply

"ravaged by the loom"

Dear god -- this can only be the same loom from my poeme ''The Weaver's Curse''. Something must be done to stop this *warped* loomdividual's loompage before the situation *spindles* out of control!!!!!!1111111111

[n/a] <~> › -=Dark_Angel=-, P.I. 13-May-04/7:10 PM Reply

wings?

[8] titan69 13-May-04/1:57 PM Reply

I like this simpell and good 8/10

[6] sliver 13-May-04/3:00 PM Reply

Sucks to be you. You know. Dead and all.

[n/a] Phalkon › sliver 14-May-04/5:46 AM Reply

luckily, i was revived by the EMS crew on the way to the hospital...