ALChemy
replying on Steak and Satin by Dovina
2 Nov 2005, 7:45 AM
But only while having Mandingo sex.
I clicked the Poemwanker link and got a wanker list. Turns out you have quite a following. How flattering it must be for you.
My point is made.
I wouldn't do that, and I don't think it's a good analogy.
See her homepage. I don't get it either, some administrative charge we common folks don't get the scoop on.
Your pattern is predictable. You change the subject, then without receiving comment on it, claim victory.
1) defining race and being racist are not related - absurd!
2) No I don't agree with that.
3) A definition of race is necessary for discussion about it - simple.
4) The white and black races are widely different, I will not retract that, and that is all I said. Besides it's not connected to the original subject.
No, we think about racism too.
Is that all you women ever think about? Sheesh!
What's up with the orange Ws?
How true, how true.
Have you seen that Tony Sinclair dude in those Tanqueray ads?
Makes you feel good to be white again don't it?
No. Blacks only sound like that when they imitate English people.
The English make white Americans look black. When blacks imitate white Americans they sound like nerdy scientist.
Prove yourself. The next ten black people you see walk up to, hold up your hand (high 5 style) and say "Whatup my nigga" then report back your findings (as soon as you get out of the hospital).
When black people try to imitate white Americans, they become transvestites. I do find that insulting.
But when black people try to imitate whites (English) they do things like wear top hats and say things like 'Gosh it is eleven, we must surely be taking tea'. Don't you find that a bit insulting.
Hey, ace accusation. No, wait - that's exactly what I've been saying since the beginning. What I've also been saying:
1) People who worry about defining race or whether definitions of race are "any good" are racist;
2) Even you can agree a perfectly good definition of race is "something racists are racist against". -=Dark_Angel=-,P.I.: "I'm racist against Cockneys". Do the math.
3) What the fuck is ANY definition of race "good" for? YOU: to make it easier for people to categorize things. ZODIAC: Any arbitrary category (ie, Things That Hurt When You Bite Them; Things That Rhyme With Poo) makes it easier for people to categorize things. The real question is, So the fuck what?
4) All of this is moot because you haven't retracted 'the black race is the most different from the white race.'
As anyone who has met one knows, Cockneys are genetically poor, thick, and uncouth. Thus even by your definition of race I'm a racist.
Look, there are basically five characteristics defined by a person's race:
(1) Smell
(2) How brown they are
(3) Whether or not they eat disgusting foreign food
(4) Stupidity
(5) Physical and moral excellence (or lack thereof)
If I were black, yes, I would be flattered by whites imitating blacks, even if it's only a stereotype of blacks.
Transvestites' trying to be like us, even if flawed, is appealing. Am I demented?
Which it is soused hogs face?
Compare this to:
Should blacks be flattered by whites who try to be like them or just insulted because what the white imitators are trying to be is a stereotype? If the latter then how well does it reflect on a black person who is flattered by the white imitators?