Poemranker [Poem: I, criminal] [by INTRANSIT] Fri Nov 21 02:58:45 PST 2025

[8] richa @ 81.86.245.13 | 31-Jul-03/9:10 AM | Reply

oh I get it you are in jail. Cool idea

I know you wanted a change of scene but this is ridiculous

[8] http://mulberryfairy @ 216.195.144.168 | 31-Jul-03/9:21 AM | Reply

Nice.

[4] poetandknowit @ 65.101.210.83 | 31-Jul-03/10:27 AM | Reply

Something in this ditty of yours needs possessing and not the gal that the cliched romance is written too. Eh?

[n/a] INTRANSIT @ 64.12.96.139 > poetandknowit | 31-Jul-03/12:56 PM | Reply

Would you happen to know where I might be able to find a first generation Mazda Rx-7 in need of some tlc?

[4] poetandknowit @ 65.101.210.83 > INTRANSIT | 31-Jul-03/12:58 PM | Reply

Do I look like the fucking classified section? Do I look like a redneck that knows anything about cars? DO I!!!!!!!!!!???????????

[n/a] INTRANSIT @ 205.188.209.14 > poetandknowit | 31-Jul-03/3:08 PM | Reply

Just asking.

[6] <~> @ 167.206.181.179 | 31-Jul-03/11:55 AM | Reply

i'm not getting it. i came back many timnes. it works, but it is far-too open-ended for me. call me simple. i like things spelled out more.

[4] poetandknowit @ 65.101.210.83 > <~> | 31-Jul-03/12:29 PM | Reply

Simple.

[6] <~> @ 167.206.181.179 > poetandknowit | 31-Jul-03/12:38 PM | Reply

moot.

[4] poetandknowit @ 65.101.210.83 > <~> | 31-Jul-03/12:39 PM | Reply

Simple.

[6] <~> @ 167.206.181.179 > poetandknowit | 31-Jul-03/12:49 PM | Reply

pleasures.

[4] poetandknowit @ 65.101.210.83 > <~> | 31-Jul-03/1:01 PM | Reply

Minds.

[6] <~> @ 167.206.181.179 > poetandknowit | 31-Jul-03/1:04 PM | Reply

yes. better still.

[10] god'swife @ 67.73.33.246 | 31-Jul-03/12:35 PM | Reply

I for one, believe this is perfect, especially the title. It's Valentine's not Valentines. 10's for you.

[8] http://mulberryfairy @ 216.195.145.66 > god'swife | 4-Aug-03/6:58 PM | Reply

If you are going to leave out the apostrophe and the capital "V", why not go all the way and write "valentimes"?

[10] god'swife @ 67.73.18.41 > http://mulberryfairy | 5-Aug-03/12:13 AM | Reply

What a perfectly lovely poetical notion. Yes, valentimes how charming like children in pre-school. You're a wonder fairy-cakes. I think I 'm starting to adore you.

[8] http://mulberryfairy @ 216.195.145.19 > god'swife | 5-Aug-03/9:40 AM | Reply

(Blush) Wanna be my valentime?

[10] Jeremi B. Handrinos @ 24.126.113.154 | 4-Aug-03/2:10 PM | Reply

Rascal

[4] poetandknowit @ 67.40.59.252 | 4-Aug-03/2:15 PM | Reply

Ding, dang darn: this still lacks the almighty possession. And don't quit your day job.

[n/a] INTRANSIT @ 152.163.252.7 > poetandknowit | 4-Aug-03/3:43 PM | Reply

If I put as much energy into my poetry as I do making a living..... Maybe a definition of ownership might help.

[4] poetandknowit @ 67.40.59.252 > INTRANSIT | 4-Aug-03/4:03 PM | Reply

Huh? What? Huh?

[n/a] INTRANSIT @ 152.163.252.7 > poetandknowit | 4-Aug-03/5:29 PM | Reply

posession, ownership of the poem. can you clarify that a little please?

[9] Billy Fights @ 24.209.21.223 | 4-Aug-03/11:40 PM | Reply

Nifty, but I think eating grapes would work better than fruit.