Help | About | Suggestions | Alms | Chat [0] | Users [0] | Log In | Join
 Search:
Poem: Submit | Random | Best | Worst | Recent | Comments   

Blanket Weed (Free verse) by Christof
First, like my daughter's hair, waving with Ophelia's madness As my hand twists, a fish in the cold bite of water Fearing the net and the shrouded enigma Of the wild banshee weed that chokes the pond; Then, like a green fleece, oozing and dripping And slip-slapping as I haul it from water to sun, Ready to be spun once the bright sighted droplets, The memories of home, have been dried and undone; Then hung on the wall like a dead shrivelled newt, Ready for the compost, a coiled desire For the water, for the silver scrape of the fish Pushing through, for the whispered thoughts of the current.

Up the ladder: The still wheel
Down the ladder: Tears.

You must be logged in to leave comments. Vote:

Votes: (green: user, blue: anonymous)
 GraphVotes
10  .. 00
.. 10
.. 10
.. 00
.. 00
.. 00
.. 00
.. 00
.. 00
.. 10
.. 00

Arithmetic Mean: 6.0
Weighted score: 5.119203
Overall Rank: 5949
Posted: July 11, 2007 1:25 AM PDT; Last modified: July 11, 2007 1:25 AM PDT
View voting details
Comments:
[8] Dovina @ 71.39.52.185 | 11-Jul-07/9:57 AM | Reply
I think you can lose "First."
Comma after water.

The green fleece image for a fish stuffed and mounted on the wall works well, but the complex way you develop it will leave some readers wondering what you mean.
[n/a] Christof @ 86.137.173.171 > Dovina | 11-Jul-07/11:50 AM | Reply
It obviously is confusing, as the green fleece is the weed - the hand is the fish. You may be right about 'First'. No comma after water, though - the line break is enough pause. That would be too much and would add nothing to the sense. No punctuation lessons are necessary, thanks.

OK. So is it not clear? I thought that the hair image was plainly referring to the weed - a fish doesn't move like that, and usually isn't green, or fleece-like. Is the hand not clearly enough the fish? I also thought the title made it clear what the subject is. If it isn't plain, the whole thing is, so to speak, blown out of the water. Oh damn it.
[9] Ranger @ 86.131.57.106 | 11-Jul-07/2:53 PM | Reply
You've had the Robert Frost touch in your last few posts; this is the only one in my opinion which creates more than a sense of triviality. Very enjoyable, dear chap.
[n/a] Christof @ 62.121.23.56 > Ranger | 13-Jul-07/2:40 AM | Reply
Glad you enjoyed and also, in view of Dovina's comments, understood it. I thought this was one of my best until her comments came back which then made me fear it was horribly obscure, so your comment has encouraged me. I think you're right about it, and about my last things, which have all been loosening up exercises really. Though if they're Frostian loosening up exercises, I can't be too upset.
[9] Ranger @ 86.131.44.93 > Christof | 18-Jul-07/4:32 PM | Reply
I think Dovina over-complicated her reading. Sometimes a poeme works better with a light read than a really in-depth analysis of the logic. The critic tends to end up confusing his/herself.

Frost's sonnet "A Soldier" should be required reading by law.
204 view(s)




Track and Plan your submissions ; Read some Comics ; Get Paid for your Poetry
PoemRanker Copyright © 2001 - 2024 - kaolin fire - All Rights Reserved
All poems Copyright © their respective authors
An internet tradition since June 9, 2001