Help | About | Suggestions | Alms | Chat [0] | Users [0] | Log In | Join
 Search:
Poem: Submit | Random | Best | Worst | Recent | Comments   

A tribute to our most precious Pearl (Free verse) by amanda_dcosta
We grew up in a home t’was yours Filled with your love and warm embrace, You taught us how to live our lives In Jesus’ name and in His grace. Your word was firm, you stood your place For truth and love and care, You gave to all who came to you The impossible you’d dare! With love you taught us right from wrong With love you sacrificed With love you bore your aches and pains And not one bit you’d sigh. Yet, still your spirit wouldn’t rest Until you did your best. And Jesus from His throne above Was always there to bless. With pride we raise this tribute To your name most precious Pearl We’re proud to be a part of you To carry out your work. We pledge to go today in love As Jesus you did follow And claim His many promises Today and not tomorrow. May God the Father, Son and Spirit Dwell within your soul As you did be to each your way Grandmother, mum and spouse. And may the divine Spirit Grant you eternal rest As you leave your earthly home For the place you deserve best. We know you’ll wait for us to come And share your home as always. And, now we know the best way there Is Jesus whom you did follow. With pride we send you on your way To where you now belong. To Paradise – the Promised Land; To our Eternal Home. Eternal rest give unto her, O lord, And let perpetual light shine upon her. May her soul rest in peace, Amen.

Up the ladder: By Request
Down the ladder: Vampires and sunblock 3000

You must be logged in to leave comments. Vote:

Votes: (green: user, blue: anonymous)
 GraphVotes
10  .. 20
.. 00
.. 20
.. 00
.. 00
.. 00
.. 00
.. 00
.. 00
.. 00
.. 10

Arithmetic Mean: 7.2
Weighted score: 5.2622466
Overall Rank: 3969
Posted: January 16, 2006 1:25 AM PST; Last modified: January 16, 2006 1:25 AM PST
View voting details
Comments:
[n/a] amanda_dcosta @ 203.145.159.37 | 16-Jan-06/1:33 AM | Reply
This is a poem I wrote last year (21st Jan), while on the train, on my way to my Grandma's funeral. Her name is Pearl Heldt, and she was such a wonderful person to me and my family, and it was with deep sorrow and gratitude that I wrote this. You might find a lot of portions need editing, but I have kept it this way, unedited, due to the fact that I wrote it spontaneously, within 15 - 20 min. for her. All the same, critiques view is welcome. We will be celebrating her 1st death anniversary on the 20th Jan. May her soul rest in peace.
[10] ALChemy @ 24.74.101.159 | 16-Jan-06/3:18 AM | Reply
You have validated her work in my opinion.
[n/a] amanda_dcosta @ 203.145.159.37 > ALChemy | 16-Jan-06/9:26 AM | Reply
Alchemy, thanks a ton. Somehow, each time I think about her I feel I could go on writing and writing about her. She is the inspiration behind my dream as a poet, and probably someday she would probably smile her full smile when she sees my book published.
[8] zodiac @ 209.193.14.154 | 17-Jan-06/10:13 AM | Reply
Good work, Amanda. I especially like the first and seventh verses (though "did be" should just be "were"). Nice.
[n/a] Dovina @ 69.175.32.104 | 17-Jan-06/5:39 PM | Reply
Amanda, I hate being the referee who calls an unpopular foul, but that’s how I feel. You have posted a poem, written in a time of sorrow, that you say you do not intend to edit and which you admit needs editing. I take the poem as heartfelt sentiment for a wonderful grandmother, and for that it is a good poem. But I think the “foul” comes when you post it on a site for voting and commenting, because there is little a commenter can say without sounding unsympathetic, and to vote low is show lack of sympathy for your feelings or lack of appreciation for your grandmother. Hope you understand.
[10] ALChemy @ 24.74.101.159 > Dovina | 18-Jan-06/9:08 AM | Reply
So...
This is hardly the place to worry about sounding unsympathetic.
Tell her what you think. Even if she won't change this poem your ideas may effect the next poem she writes. Anybody who complains about valid negetive criticism as being cruel is a total pussy.
[n/a] Dovina @ 17.255.240.138 > ALChemy | 18-Jan-06/11:00 AM | Reply
I considered doing that, and I find plenty to complain about in this poem. I responded as I did because everyone who has commented seemed to be doing so out of curtesy to her and her grandmother. Either that or they really think the poetic structure of this poem is great.
[8] zodiac @ 209.193.14.236 > Dovina | 18-Jan-06/2:35 PM | Reply
I'm playing with the idea that there are more arenas in poetry than I've previously imagined. There's the hymnal, religious, family-oriented arena (amanda's); the poetic song lyric arena (like wilco's); the publication in Big Name journals arena (mine); the deeply personal arena; the writer's-pleasure-only arena, probably; and who knows how many others (SLAM!, California wackiness, goth, poop.)

Amanda's poems would not be successful in my arena, yes. Neither would mine be suitable for hers. But in our own arenas, we're both aces. To be sure, the very best poetry is the best because it suits more than one crowd or idea of poetry - Frost comes to mind for being personal and big name; Donne for being lyrical, big-name, and devotional. And so on.

Should I insist on judging amanda's work by how well it would fit in, say, Atlantic Quarterly? Or an L.A. SLAM! reading? Doesn't that discount a lot of popular, enduring writing that's well-suited to its place?

Feel free to disagree. I can see why anyone would.
[n/a] -=Dark_Angel=-, P.I. @ 86.134.39.188 > zodiac | 18-Jan-06/2:52 PM | Reply
Clearly Dovina thinks all poemes should be deposited in the Arena of Gladiatorial Combat. I, for one, am less belligerent. I have always sought refuge in the Arenas of Constructive Criticism and Ritualistic Funeral Poetry, which is where we find ourselves now...

...but this dumpling leaves a sour taste in my mouth. There isn't a single poeme alive that couldn't be made better by referring to The Holy Spirit as The Holy Ghost. The King James Version learnt this lesson long ago, and amanda would do well to follow its example. The Holy Ghost is a Ghost. It haunts things. That is the definition of Ghost. Why would Bibles refer to it as a Ghost if it was some sort of special 'Ghost' that wasn't actually a ghost at all because it didn't really haunt things? The two defining characteristics of a ghost are:

(1) Haunting things
(2) Walking through walls

The Holy Ghost does both.
[10] ALChemy @ 24.74.101.159 > -=Dark_Angel=-, P.I. | 18-Jan-06/11:02 PM | Reply
"I wanna be just as close as
the holy ghost is
and lay you doowwwn
in a bed of roses."- Bon Jovi.

Oh yes. A great poetic device indeed.
[n/a] Dovina @ 69.175.32.104 > -=Dark_Angel=-, P.I. | 19-Jan-06/9:40 AM | Reply
When the Apostle Paul wrote about the Holy Ghost, he was using King James English and a 1620's dictionary, so you are absolutely correct.
[8] zodiac @ 209.193.14.236 > Dovina | 19-Jan-06/9:51 AM | Reply
Paul was writing in a tradition where spirit, ghost, and breath were the same word. In Greek, 'spirit' is most commonly translated πνεύμα (pneuma), which you might recognize from some other interesting words.

'When the disciples saw him walking on the lake, they were terrified. "It's a ghost," they said, and cried out in fear.'
[n/a] Dovina @ 69.175.32.104 > zodiac | 19-Jan-06/10:26 AM | Reply
In Mt.14:26 and Mk.6:49, the word is Φάντασμα, phantasma, an appearance or apparition.
[8] zodiac @ 209.193.14.236 > Dovina | 19-Jan-06/11:01 AM | Reply
Yeah, I didn't actually mean the Matthew passage to come into this discussion. I just thought it was cute.

I also didn't mean Greek used the same word for spirit/ghost/breath; I meant Hebrew, Arabic, and Aramaic do.
[8] Caducus @ 195.224.86.71 | 18-Jan-06/8:40 AM | Reply
Dont know the history of the drafts but dont care its one of those poems which moves me.

That rarely happens.
[n/a] amanda_dcosta @ 203.145.159.37 | 22-Jan-06/8:07 PM | Reply
Dovina, correct me if i'm wrong. I stated that I've posted it unedited since having written it last year. This was so that you could read the original piece that was written. This was what I wrote spontaneously for her and had done nothing about it since then. But, all the same, I've said that critique's views are welcome. I agree, I wrote it in a time of deep sorrow, but then, that doesn't mean you can't tell me what portions need editing or what you feel about the poem. When I wrote this and the many other pieces of mine, I had no one to actually guide me, and there was no feed back. I rely on you guys to give me a frank opinion. So be free (and unsympathetic) to air your opinion, especially when asked for. I would really appreciate this.
325 view(s)




Track and Plan your submissions ; Read some Comics ; Get Paid for your Poetry
PoemRanker Copyright © 2001 - 2024 - kaolin fire - All Rights Reserved
All poems Copyright © their respective authors
An internet tradition since June 9, 2001