Help | About | Suggestions | Alms | Chat [0] | Users [0] | Log In | Join
 Search:
Poem: Submit | Random | Best | Worst | Recent | Comments   

Delicate Was (Free verse) by klosterfobik
Just when my unmeant imagination thought it safe, just when I thought I'd learned - to forget to remember the suntanned symmetry of you; I happened upon a tragical trace of a scent of past perfume - a sickening sweet, redolent relic, of almost - always past, left upon a pillow on the unmade bed where once we laid and dreamt and shuddered. Just that one slippery, apple-green breath of delicate was stole truth from time and past from fate. So long it seems - an age ago, maybe even longer, so hard to tell these days - harder still to tell these days from dreams - dreams of together - perfect and peculiar us.

Up the ladder: and the professor, too
Down the ladder: All because of you

You must be logged in to leave comments. Vote:

Votes: (green: user, blue: anonymous)
 GraphVotes
10  .. 41
.. 00
.. 00
.. 00
.. 00
.. 00
.. 01
.. 00
.. 00
.. 00
.. 71

Arithmetic Mean: 3.857143
Weighted score: 4.1645045
Overall Rank: 13263
Posted: August 28, 2004 9:05 PM PDT; Last modified: September 7, 2004 6:42 PM PDT
View voting details
Comments:
[9] Dovina @ 24.52.157.176 | 29-Aug-04/9:08 AM | Reply
Very nice. The last line seems redundent or not needed.
[9] Dovina @ 24.52.157.176 | 7-Sep-04/7:31 PM | Reply
I see you changed the ending, and the rest seems all different too. "perfect and peculiar us" is very nice.
[n/a] klosterfobik @ 64.12.117.6 > Dovina | 7-Sep-04/8:04 PM | Reply
Thanks.
[0] Shardik @ 24.130.62.63 | 7-Sep-04/9:06 PM | Reply
I once buggered an otter named Luke.
[n/a] zodiac @ 213.186.171.49 | 8-Sep-04/1:18 AM | Reply
I'm confused about how you intended for the phrase "of delicate was" to be grammatical and relevant, instead of just being a cutesy Ben Harper-ish affectation. Would you mind explaining it to me? Thanks,

The Islam Society for Grammar Detention
[n/a] klosterfobik @ 64.12.117.6 > zodiac | 8-Sep-04/1:07 PM | Reply
Delicate was refers to a fleeting - fragile memory left behind by a girl in the form of a sweet odor,its delicate because if you tamper with it it will go away.Do you not even appriciate the
the scents of the women you've had?Like their perfume,lotion or shampoo?Sorry if its "cutesy".And as for affection your correct,as for Ben Harper-ish your very wrong.
[n/a] zodiac @ 217.144.13.23 > klosterfobik | 8-Sep-04/1:40 PM | Reply
Do you mean for "was" to be a noun?
[n/a] klosterfobik @ 64.12.117.6 > zodiac | 8-Sep-04/3:10 PM | Reply
I know its an adverb but I just thought I'd try it as a noun,like daybreak,red-letter day,bygone or past...
seems more dramatic this way?Or not?
[n/a] zodiac @ 217.144.15.36 > klosterfobik | 9-Sep-04/4:43 AM | Reply
Was isn't an adverb. It's a linking verb.

Your examples are not grammatically similar to "delicate was".
[n/a] klosterfobik @ 152.163.101.7 > zodiac | 9-Sep-04/4:29 PM | Reply
How about slippery past - or vitreous gone by?
[n/a] klosterfobik @ 152.163.101.7 > zodiac | 9-Sep-04/4:45 PM | Reply
Linking means to adjoin,add,couple,fit together...so how is it not an "adverb"?
[n/a] klosterfobik @ 64.12.117.6 > klosterfobik | 10-Sep-04/10:15 PM | Reply
Zodiac is such a fraud!!!!!
[n/a] zodiac @ 212.38.148.226 > klosterfobik | 13-Sep-04/3:19 AM | Reply
Hey, congratulations on replying to your own comment, and in an extraordinary dim fashion matched only by the dimness of your original comment. Let's leave it at this, klosterfobik: If was was an adverb, it would still be improperly used, since a) an adjective (like "delicate") can't modify an adverb, b) you're using it as a noun, and c) IT'S NOT AN ADVERB, dumbass, it's a linking verb (i.e., a form of 'to be'). Dim, dim, dim
[10] unnesessary @ 64.12.117.6 > zodiac | 15-Sep-04/1:03 PM | Reply
No offense there, Zodie,but I think Kloster is quite correct.Delicate can modify "was",because "was" is meant to be a memory - which can be delicate.
[n/a] -=Dark_Angel=-, P.I. @ 81.154.163.133 > unnesessary | 15-Sep-04/2:41 PM | Reply
Yes, but then he's using 'was' as a noun. Which he denies. Which is the whole motherfucking point. There is nothing wrong with using 'was' as a noun for poetic effect - e e bummings does stuff like that in some of his poemes (e.g 'anyone lived in a pretty how town'). But to use 'was' as a noun whilst thinking you're using it as an adverb is obviously bosh.
[0] Bachus @ 24.130.62.102 | 11-Sep-04/5:36 PM | Reply
yourself
[n/a] klosterfobik @ 205.188.117.6 > Bachus | 11-Sep-04/5:58 PM | Reply
myself?
[0] Shardik @ 24.130.62.63 | 15-Sep-04/11:32 AM | Reply
Plumber
[0] <{Baba^Yaga}> @ 24.130.62.63 | 15-Sep-04/2:33 PM | Reply
A chinese cookie stuffed with shit peanuts.
[0] <{Baba^Yaga}> @ 24.130.62.63 | 15-Sep-04/2:34 PM | Reply
A squid sticking out of your obese wife's ass, begging for sperm whale.
[10] deleted user @ 172.145.75.64 > <{Baba^Yaga}> | 17-Sep-04/7:22 PM | Reply
Jeremy loves it that way.
Squids and all!
[0] edpeterson @ 68.79.20.59 | 28-Oct-04/7:01 AM | Reply
i had intended to rank this poem on its merits, but then I read the comments. adverb indeed. -0-
223 view(s)




Track and Plan your submissions ; Read some Comics ; Get Paid for your Poetry
PoemRanker Copyright © 2001 - 2024 - kaolin fire - All Rights Reserved
All poems Copyright © their respective authors
An internet tradition since June 9, 2001