Re: a comment on Omerta el prostitute by <{Baba^Yaga}>	3-Mar-03/4:09 PM
Well . . . it was decided that people aren't wearing enough hats.
Re: The Gentleman by -=Dark_Angel=-, P.I.	3-Mar-03/4:06 PM
I hate it, I give you a 9 and not a point more.
Re: a comment on Omerta el prostitute by <{Baba^Yaga}>	24-Feb-03/5:35 PM
Laughs and takes it to a philosophy forum instead.
Re: a comment on Omerta el prostitute by <{Baba^Yaga}>	23-Feb-03/7:30 PM
The corruption only starts when the money matters, it mutates only when it matters (or doesn't matter). Is there no way to be zen about it?
Re: a comment on Omerta el prostitute by <{Baba^Yaga}>	23-Feb-03/6:06 PM
But surely as a hobby . . . ?
Re: a comment on Omerta el prostitute by <{Baba^Yaga}>	23-Feb-03/5:54 PM
No I am just a random san-ni-ga. So what's cooking in the oven today?
Re: a comment on Omerta el prostitute by <{Baba^Yaga}>	23-Feb-03/5:43 PM
Yep yep. I wonder if I should consider a career change?
Re: a comment on Omerta el prostitute by <{Baba^Yaga}>	23-Feb-03/5:04 PM
Yes see my above comment. I wasn't reading into it at all.
Re: a comment on Omerta el prostitute by <{Baba^Yaga}>	23-Feb-03/5:02 PM
I don't disagree and probably no comment was necessary from me. I was actually commenting on something more simple and removed from the theme of the poem. The glass as opposed to window. It was obvious but your change made it a little better.
Re: Omerta el prostitute by <{Baba^Yaga}>	23-Feb-03/3:54 PM
The change eliminated ambiguity.
Re: a comment on Stout Stick by Enki	23-Feb-03/3:45 PM
Thanks. You hit the . . . ummm . . . nail right on the head.
Re: a comment on Boddhistava by Enki	23-Feb-03/3:36 PM
Quite right. As "The Eye" testifies, I am the "Elephant Man".
Re: a comment on Miracle by Enki	23-Feb-03/3:31 PM
Actually the "crap" obviously does have a point. This is unlike the formatting of your comment. As for if it's badly written? I'll just have to take the word of a Bard such as yourself.
Re: a comment on Stout Stick by Enki	23-Feb-03/3:21 PM
On the first complaint. I've edited the poem so that breaks are more obvious in the way it's meant to be read. So perhaps that will clarify why there is a second "in the closet". So now the poem has 4 verses instead of two, the first three following the same style the last being different to the other three. Can't comment on your second complaint as you don't explain your gripe with it. The last line is however meant to break with the rest of the poem.
Re: Reply To the 9,000 Poets Against War. by Blue Magpie	23-Feb-03/6:02 AM
No comment on the message behind the poem, except that a few assumptions are being made throughout it. On the poem itself I would have liked to have given it a 9. Some of the verse did seem a little forced however so an 8. Very nice though.