replying on Omerta el prostitute by <{Baba^Yaga}>
3 Mar 2003, 4:09 PM
Well . . . it was decided that people aren't wearing enough hats.
on The Gentleman by -=Dark_Angel=-, P.I.
3 Mar 2003, 4:06 PM
I hate it, I give you a 9 and not a point more.
replying on Omerta el prostitute by <{Baba^Yaga}>
24 Feb 2003, 5:35 PM
Laughs and takes it to a philosophy forum instead.
replying on Omerta el prostitute by <{Baba^Yaga}>
23 Feb 2003, 7:30 PM
The corruption only starts when the money matters, it mutates only when it matters (or doesn't matter). Is there no way to be zen about it?
replying on Omerta el prostitute by <{Baba^Yaga}>
23 Feb 2003, 6:06 PM
But surely as a hobby . . . ?
replying on Omerta el prostitute by <{Baba^Yaga}>
23 Feb 2003, 5:54 PM
No I am just a random san-ni-ga.
So what's cooking in the oven today?
So what's cooking in the oven today?
replying on Omerta el prostitute by <{Baba^Yaga}>
23 Feb 2003, 5:43 PM
Yep yep. I wonder if I should consider a career change?
replying on Omerta el prostitute by <{Baba^Yaga}>
23 Feb 2003, 5:04 PM
Yes see my above comment. I wasn't reading into it at all.
replying on Omerta el prostitute by <{Baba^Yaga}>
23 Feb 2003, 5:02 PM
I don't disagree and probably no comment was necessary from me. I was actually commenting on something more simple and removed from the theme of the poem. The glass as opposed to window. It was obvious but your change made it a little better.
on Omerta el prostitute by <{Baba^Yaga}>
23 Feb 2003, 3:54 PM
The change eliminated ambiguity.
replying on Stout Stick by Enki
23 Feb 2003, 3:45 PM
Thanks. You hit the . . . ummm . . . nail right on the head.
replying on Boddhistava by Enki
23 Feb 2003, 3:36 PM
Quite right.
As "The Eye" testifies, I am the "Elephant Man".
As "The Eye" testifies, I am the "Elephant Man".
replying on Stout Stick by Enki
23 Feb 2003, 3:21 PM
On the first complaint. I've edited the poem so that breaks are more obvious in the way it's meant to be read. So perhaps that will clarify why there is a second "in the closet".
So now the poem has 4 verses instead of two, the first three following the same style the last being different to the other three. Can't comment on your second complaint as you don't explain your gripe with it. The last line is however meant to break with the rest of the poem.
So now the poem has 4 verses instead of two, the first three following the same style the last being different to the other three. Can't comment on your second complaint as you don't explain your gripe with it. The last line is however meant to break with the rest of the poem.
on Reply To the 9,000 Poets Against War. by Blue Magpie
23 Feb 2003, 6:02 AM
No comment on the message behind the poem, except that a few assumptions are being made throughout it. On the poem itself I would have liked to have given it a 9. Some of the verse did seem a little forced however so an 8. Very nice though.