Re: #3 by mikejedw	23-May-02/2:31 AM
Hey -- this isn't half bad! I think "floating world" is a cliche, though, as well as being scentifically inaccurate (poetry doesn't give you a licence you know..)
Re: Tom and Jerry by WarrenGDawg	23-May-02/2:33 AM
I'm amazed by how many of these things I like: is this one meant to sound obscene?
Re: Jericho by goldfish	23-May-02/2:37 AM
you could cut some of the philiosophising, because that seems rhyme driven and doesn't really make sense. I kind of agree with the Rush lyrics: actually, it reminds me of a songs by early 70s band the Strawbs.. less said about that the better. But ballads are good, we like ballads...
regarding some deleted poem...	23-May-02/5:56 AM
Who's Greg Evigan? It's funny though: nice to see someone thinking about words. Why is it in the concrete section?
regarding some deleted poem...	24-May-02/1:48 AM
the image isn't terribly clear, which isn't necessarily a problem, but in a little poem like this, I think it has to be more precise
regarding some deleted poem...	24-May-02/1:55 AM
Every time I try to visit the Evigan website my browser crashes...I guess I'm doomed not to know. Ta anyway, though it's still not a concrete poem...
Re: actually chicken and mushroom pies are nice too by cav	27-May-02/2:38 AM
how about 'testicular' appearance -scans better?
Re: lurcher for lunch - for James Kelman by roy rocket	27-May-02/2:45 AM
have you read tom leonard? I think you'd like him.
Re: art by feelinglistless	27-May-02/8:43 AM
It's a rather rosy view of inspiration or art, 'lost careers' notwithstanding...
Re: forever looking (in) by muted_screams	27-May-02/8:55 AM
don't feel sorry for yourself, petal. Life's too short... He wasn't worth it, anyway. You can tell.