Help | About | Suggestions | Alms | Chat [0] | Users [0] | Log In | Join
 Search:
Poem: Submit | Random | Best | Worst | Recent | Comments   

Detective vs Doctor (The Explaination) (Other) by Y2kSlamPoet
_________________________________________________________ Official -=Dark_Angel=- Comment Analysis... 100% Complete The -shrug- was intended to indicate nonchalance. Alas it betrays quite the opposite. _________________________________________________________ (Recent Public Detective Notes From Detective W.) Explanation of why I call Dark-Angel -Detective- Watson, and not -Doctor- Watson: Dark, like i said: sometimes a cigar is just a cigar Detective Watson. :) Now, you asked before why i called you a detective, and why i used the name of Watson (the psychologist), and did not give you the title of doctor. Well, i made a quick, easy, lame response the first time you asked because frankly, your stubborn, persistent, and you never accept the answers i give you. (you always supply your own, which makes me wonder why you bother asking me.. why not inform me of the truth? eh? saves us the time of doing the questionaire) Heres my new official response: Doctors are people that others goto to be cured of a disease or problem. For Watson this service is called "therapy". His speciality was behavioristic psychology. Your a detective, because i did not seek cures or your psychoanalysis. You investigate to figure out the reason behind my actions.. and your not paid by me, so your not a doctor providing a patient medical attention. You act upon a need to unravel a secret, and to bring light to what you call the "truth". You then provide a public report of your findings: that is what a detective does. If you were my therapist, there would be something called Patient Confidentiality.. so you better hope your not a doctor, because i do have a lawyer. :P Now, as we can see, this is a perfectly logical, and precise explaination. Well, as precise as I am currently motivated to explain, anyway, and ofcourse, being the detective im sure you will find some unknown clue to the secret "truth" to my "fabricated" response made to perhaps do damage control or what ever.. you'll tell me ofcourse, im sure, atleast i dont need to pay you 100-200 an hour for it. Also, if i did care about the wings, well then i was all upset over nothing, because I've just discovered that i have been stripped of my ability to fly.. i guess it was a temporary blessing.. [Note for Z: I didn't know sinners could be forgiven.. ;/ Oh holy Jesu! I repent! :P Thanks.]

Up the ladder: Tuesday
Down the ladder: Goodbye

You must be logged in to leave comments. Vote:

Votes: (green: user, blue: anonymous)
 GraphVotes
10  .. 10
.. 00
.. 00
.. 00
.. 00
.. 00
.. 00
.. 00
.. 00
.. 01
.. 21

Arithmetic Mean: 2.2
Weighted score: 4.6662316
Overall Rank: 12245
Posted: August 31, 2003 7:31 PM PDT; Last modified: August 31, 2003 7:31 PM PDT
View voting details
Comments:
[n/a] Y2kSlamPoet @ 66.81.151.87 | 31-Aug-03/9:30 PM | Reply
dont worry, im still not a christian, and am doomed to never be blessed with religion.
[0] King Abdullah II @ 195.157.153.253 | 1-Sep-03/12:41 AM | Reply
Note to -=Dark_Angel=-

Dear sir,

Please do not respond to Y2kSlamPoete's latest flimsy post. It's blatantly obvious that he's a shameless liar. We all know he made the mistake of calling you "Detective" Watson as a result of his crippling ignorance. It is very obvious that he is attempting to cover up for his error by posting this rambling self-justificatory missive, the gist of which is that he *deliberately* called you "Detective" Watson because the word "Doctor" was singularly inappropriate for someone unqualified in medical matters. He's so transparent in his clumsy manoeuvring and so patently dim-witted in the execution of his designs that you are saved the task of pointing out his numerous glaring errors.

Yours &c.

Abdullah x x x x x
[n/a] Y2kSlamPoet @ 69.19.182.150 > King Abdullah II | 1-Sep-03/2:55 AM | Reply
flimsy?

Whats incorrect in my logic exactly? hrmm?

I consider Dark-Angel unqualified in medical matters..

Thats all, simply one person, and it has nothing to do with my view of detectives.

I find his methodes of pseudo psychoanalysis to be crude..

It reminds me of the cliche therapy responses i see made by bad actors in crappy movie productions.

Nothing is ever what it is.. hrmm.. its always just me "hiding my inner emotions". Yes.. i cannot reveal the truth that i have been UTTERLY CRUSHED by his remarks!!! i am emotionally traumatized and suffer a case of extreme denial, unable to cope with the realities.

Yes yes yes.. i could pay someone 10 bucks to tell me that.. i could do this wonderful "acting" myself and save myself 10 dollars.

P-R-E-D-I-C-T-A-B-L-E

isnt it?.. see, your comment saved Darkie the finger work of providing his response.. i even said this response for him in a simplier fashion in the official explaination:

"detective im sure you will find some unknown clue to
the secret "truth" to my "fabricated" response made to perhaps
do damage control or what ever.."

END OF STORY.

Ofcourse, id like him to offer his take on my logic concerning why he can't be called a doctor, where i excluded my personal feeling towards him. I'm curiouse.
[n/a] Y2kSlamPoet @ 69.19.182.150 > King Abdullah II | 1-Sep-03/3:08 AM | Reply
Impersonation of Dark-Angel:

Abdulla, this is clearly you saving your ass. Because a logical explaination has been given to provide the reason why dark angel does not do what a psychologist does, which shows why he cannot be called as such.

It is also providing an excuse for dark-angel not to respond, which shows that you might actually be dark-angel in disguise.

You cannot risk the possibility of revealing the fact that dark-angel is a bad actor, who couldn't provide actual professional therapy to anyone in need of it what so ever.

This fact also shows his lack of intelligence, and how unstudied he is in REAL behavioristic psychology.
------

See, i can do it too! but i think i left out the part that says

"its all a way of showing that dark-angel has no need to explain, its a sign of denial" Etc etc.

A GOOD BULLSHITTER. perfectly suited to be a politician i think, he can talk, he sure can.. but can he say anything of real substance, that remains to be seen.
269 view(s)




Track and Plan your submissions ; Read some Comics ; Get Paid for your Poetry
PoemRanker Copyright © 2001 - 2024 - kaolin fire - All Rights Reserved
All poems Copyright © their respective authors
An internet tradition since June 9, 2001