Re: a comment on Me 2, Nature 0 by rnuk	20-Aug-06/3:54 PM
Apologies for the appalling grammar, terrible northern dialect I have yet to shake.
Re: a comment on Chickens by rnuk	17-Aug-06/6:17 AM
It's capitalism from a Marxist view point, ie. should the workers (who are the means of production) revolt against the autocrats in power (those who distribute products and "reward" the workers), they will be crushed. Still, thanks though.
Re: my goat by joey	14-Aug-06/2:15 PM
This is simply not true. Goats can be milked and the milk can be made into tasty cheeses. Starts off good, gets silly (bad silly) very quickly.
Re: Ouija by creepshow	14-Aug-06/2:14 PM
If it wasn't so wordy, it could be better. I'm not saying I don't like wordy stuff; I'm a bit of a sesquipedelian myself, but the more obscure words and tangled phrases seem unnecessary and draw it dangerously close to pretention, and pretentious is a hard look to pull off well.
Re: Replenished by outdoorzylady	14-Aug-06/2:11 PM
I'm a fussy arse, me. This is good, but the exclaimation marks are superfluous I think, and it would be much more beautiful and understated without them. Sorry.