Re: a comment on Reasonably Good by Dovina	26-Mar-05/6:10 PM
I do not accept the one-to-one correspondance of valves as you describe them insofar as they are remotely connected to anything real. This is a nice little game you wish to play, but frankly, I'm not interested.
Re: a comment on Integration by jroday	26-Mar-05/10:48 AM
Let me see, hit on twice, integrated zilch. Not bad.
Re: a comment on Reasonably Good by Dovina	26-Mar-05/10:46 AM
My open mindedness allows me to receive more truth than my closed mindedness does. A lot of rehash is going on here.
Re: a comment on Reasonably Good by Dovina	26-Mar-05/10:41 AM
You have said that you believe truth does not exist. Therefore any arguement concerning the entrance of truth into a mind is unimportant to you. I don't think I'm being dogmatic.
Re: a comment on Reasonably Good by Dovina	26-Mar-05/10:37 AM
I understand. The problem is your definition of "valve." Even if the two valves are different, they are still valves. By your definition, a closed valve can let as much water through as an open valve of the same kind. I'm not willing to discuss valves that do not work like real valves.
Re: Integration by jroday	26-Mar-05/6:27 AM
Integrate! Yes.
Re: a comment on No Worries by Dovina	26-Mar-05/6:23 AM
You have answered for me. Have fun at the beach, it's quite delusional.
Re: a comment on Reasonably Good by Dovina	26-Mar-05/6:17 AM
Lets review: You want to talk about a valve that allows water to pass when it is closed, even as much water as when it is open. I don’t want to. Impass. Happens every day. No reason to get upset. You call me obstinate, wet, feminine, a failure, closed minded (you forgot dimtard) Fine. Discuss it with someone who cares.
Re: a comment on Reasonably Good by Dovina	26-Mar-05/6:07 AM
You haven't read all of his comments, have you?
Re: a comment on The Symbol by Dovina	26-Mar-05/6:05 AM
Untrue on all counts. You fail.
Re: Cancer by mindsigns	25-Mar-05/2:36 PM
Aparently, you are speaking to the cancer in "I am your source . . ." If so, the first word should be "You." Try changing "fixate" to "die."
Re: foreplay by DR Limerick	25-Mar-05/2:28 PM
Limericks are so hard to use as a means of saying anything besides funny-ha-ha, I'm surprised you haven't tried something else by now.
Re: The Hold Up by luzrheroguy	25-Mar-05/2:25 PM
Funny. Nice ending.
Re: a comment on Reasonably Good by Dovina	25-Mar-05/2:19 PM
I had no delusion that the comments pertained to the poem. You think the narrator is a dunce, and I could agree or not agree, depending on which position I wish to view the poem from. Since you do not believe truth exists, or at least it appears you do not, this kind of poem seems silly to you. All I ask is that you consider it from several viewpoints besides you own.
Re: Reasonably Good by Dovina	25-Mar-05/10:53 AM
I have revised it because nobody understood it the way I did. Of all the comments, here and elsewhere, I did not see that I had communicated. I hope these changes will clarify.
Re: a comment on The Symbol by Dovina	25-Mar-05/10:36 AM
I wrote the poem. I had nobody in mind, only the common practice of wearing a cross about the neck.
Re: a comment on Reasonably Good by Dovina	25-Mar-05/10:33 AM
I have read it and find some of it useful to programming in AutoLisp, a varient of LISP. The style shown in my poem is more common in AutoLisp than the style shown in the link. AutoLisp is the only LISP I know well enough to comment on.
Re: a comment on Reasonably Good by Dovina	25-Mar-05/10:28 AM
I understand what you are saying and disagree for reasons I have stated. We have reached an impass.
Re: a comment on Reasonably Good by Dovina	25-Mar-05/7:48 AM
Yes, but we know that particles exist in truth which Newton could noit have known about. Unless you want to argue that particles are not truth, but representations of something unknown. In that case we have more truth to learn. The difference is that I believe truth exists and you aparently do not.
Re: a comment on The Symbol by Dovina	25-Mar-05/7:43 AM
No, the cross is a symbol of the same death as the crucifix is. I was not trying to be vague.