No thanks, I have lot's of big windows, and a lovely backyard. Plus I am at work, well, I have to do a movie at the end of the month and play a show at the bigfoot lodge, but other than that this is what I do currently, I'm at my desk, in my beautifully well lit (naturally, of course) Den/Frontroom finishing up my book and writing two movies. One for Carlos Diegus and one for this flaming filipino friend of mine. Therefore, forgive me if I cackle at you and say "Lick my scrotum freak!"

italy, sometimes poetry does include the offensive, anti-PC, and outright disturbing writes, i wouldnt be so narrow minded.

youll find that many good poets carry some "poetry crafted to offend, shock, and anger the masses"

then again, -shrug-. but its wise to not discard anything too quickly- i learned this the hard way. :)

I rather enjoyed the part with the ass whole moon? lol.

You obviously haven't done your homework. I suggest you view my homepages or look me up on the Imdb.com. I sir, am a bonafide dandy, and quite the lady's man. I'm gentle, handsome, and highly sophisticated. I think you should call the FBI.

>>This is plagerism [sic] and I've already sent the entire url, copied pg etc in. Get a life! Even to make a parody you need consent.<<

No, you don't. <Putting on my pretty pedant hat,> Parody is a form of expression protected under the First Amendment here in the U.S.--it's considered fair use. The Supreme Court (aka the Felonious Five & colleagues) confirmed this in Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music (92-1292), 510 U.S. 569 (1994), when (this is true) 2 Live Crew was sued by the music company that owned the rights to Roy Orbison's Pretty Woman, because 2 Live Crew did a parody of it in their own inimitable fashion. (I don't make this stuff up.) You can read the Court's Opinion here: http://supct.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/92-1292.ZO.html

Justice Kennedy (who wrote the concurring opinion) set out these relevant observations:

". . . certain general principles are now discernable to define the fair use exception for parody. . . . parody may qualify as fair use only if it draws upon the original composition to make humorous or ironic commentary about that same composition. . . . It is not enough that the parody use the original in a humorous fashion, however creative that humor may be. ***The parody must target the original***[my emphasis], and not just its general style, the genre of art to which it belongs, or society as a whole (although if it targets the original, it may target those features as well)."
http://supct.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/92-1292.ZC.html

Just sayin'.