Poemranker [Poem: I hate Haiku's. Bombs away.] [by Rollsoftoiletpaper] Wed Apr 02 13:56:54 PDT 2025

[n/a] Rollsoftoiletpaper @ 152.163.101.9 | 16-Oct-04/8:13 PM | Reply

I really, really hate Haiku's. This is my first one ever. Tell me, public, does this Haiku pass as standable?

[n/a] -=Dark_Angel=-, P.I. @ 82.39.18.226 > Rollsoftoiletpaper | 16-Oct-04/8:21 PM | Reply

1. This is not a Haiku, it's a Meta-ku, as you would know if you'd spent more time reading the pop-up help and less time funneling beetles into your cock.

2. Stop posting.

[n/a] Rollsoftoiletpaper @ 152.163.100.65 > -=Dark_Angel=-, P.I. | 16-Oct-04/8:49 PM | Reply

1. I probably should take it upon myself to actually know what it is I'm writing, or attempting to write.

2. I've no male genitalia with which to "funnel".

3. I live in the U.S. of A. and one of the beautiful things about it is the privaledge to do whatever the hell I want.

[n/a] -=Dark_Angel=-, P.I. @ 82.39.18.226 > Rollsoftoiletpaper | 17-Oct-04/5:18 AM | Reply

1. What
2. No well maybe thats your problem
3. Really, well its my privaledge to parp on your unfunny poetry.
4. I didn't give it a 0, you fucking clown. Click on 'voting details' to find out who did.

[n/a] Rollsoftoiletpaper @ 152.163.100.65 > -=Dark_Angel=-, P.I. | 16-Oct-04/8:54 PM | Reply

Also,this Meta-ku, as you call it, certainly does deserve the zero you've given it, but just because you couldn't wash your dirty little mouth out for 2 seconds to say "this sucked", I'll give it a 10, just out of spite.

[n/a] deleted user @ 81.178.239.106 > Rollsoftoiletpaper | 17-Oct-04/7:22 AM | Reply

A meta-ku is a haiku about a haiku. Therefore the meta part must reflect nature too. Therefore this is not even a meta-ku. In conclusion it is impossible to write a nature poem about a poem. Even this is incorrect:

please understand
a haiku's about nature,
nature you retards.

[0] cuddlytiger17 @ 209.105.159.7 | 16-Oct-04/8:40 PM | Reply

lol nice. ur an ass. haha.

[n/a] deleted user @ 81.178.239.106 > cuddlytiger17 | 17-Oct-04/7:18 AM | Reply

If you were a more articulate commentator, rollsoftoiletpaper may have better understood that you thought this poem was worth a -0-.

[0] cuddlytiger17 @ 209.105.159.47 > deleted user | 17-Oct-04/1:57 PM | Reply

All right, I don't know what your problem is, but it doesn't take a genious to click on the link that says "View voting details."