Re: a comment on inverse square by ex0teric |
15-May-04/10:44 AM |
good point, thank you. The point was more that they are close enough to be the major attractive force on each other. I will work out an edit to make that more apparant later!
|
|
|
|
Re: At the door by fufuberry |
14-May-04/2:56 AM |
don't be sad. it's against the rules!
|
|
|
|
Re: a comment on inverse square by ex0teric |
13-May-04/10:06 PM |
Completely regardless of the validity of my poem, which really probably sucks anyway (though the one rating would indicate otherwise), this is the most entertained I've been in a while. Carry on.
|
|
|
|
Re: a comment on inverse square by ex0teric |
13-May-04/10:03 PM |
A) I like it
B) to remember that I have it.
|
|
|
|
Re: a comment on inverse square by ex0teric |
13-May-04/10:03 PM |
Perhaps I am not remembering my high school physics correctly.
IIRC, gravity is inverse square -- as two things get closer, they will attract each other more, and get closer, and so on. If I am wrong, then this whole nice little metaphor of mine is moot! >.<;
|
|
|
|