Re: a comment on Breakfast by Dhanesh M Kumar	8-Mar-06/11:59 AM
Actually Powell was originally against the war. This was Rumsfeld's baby. Powell was pressured into getting involved. Rice had nothing to do with planning the war. Of course we've been trying to do this for decades, first the peaceful way, now this way. Guess what country we're going after next? If you guessed Iran give yourself a lollipop.
Re: a comment on Breakfast by Dhanesh M Kumar	8-Mar-06/11:43 AM
"There have been 2,509 coalition deaths, 2,304 Americans, one Australian, 103 Britons, 13 Bulgarians, two Danes, two Dutch, two Estonians, one Hungarian, 26 Italians, one Kazakh, one Latvian, 17 Poles, two Salvadoran, three Slovaks, 11 Spaniards, two Thai and 18 Ukrainians in the war in Iraq as of March 8, 2006, according to a CNN count." No need to defend us because from the looks of it we're too busy defending you and everybody else. Besides we're not doing anything any other powerful country hasn't already done before.
Re: Breakfast by Dhanesh M Kumar	8-Mar-06/8:49 AM
Show, don't tell. Don't preach. Nobody needs to be told America is evil. We already know we are. We admire the level of evil Iraq has reached. We can only dream of the days when we can cut clits off women and heads off peace corp workers. Do you really think all this bitching is going to sway Americans? More importantly, do you hate black people? I noticed you only mentioned the name of negros. Really the more I read this the more I realize you're terrifically racist.
Re: a comment on There by Dovina	7-Mar-06/5:36 PM
Sorry to change up the analogy but sometimes mom's kiss on a skinned knee eases the pain better than any medicine. Just as long as you're smart enough to get it disinfected later.
Re: a comment on There by Dovina	7-Mar-06/4:20 PM
Wouldn't it be nice if there was one though. You know if maybe you're running by Saturn and -woops- your invisible shoe falls off and the laces are hard to see so you don't want to mess with them so you hope the invisible shoe horn touches you so you can grab it and use it to fix your dilemma.
Re: a comment on There by Dovina	7-Mar-06/4:10 PM
Check your King David comment.
Re: a comment on There by Dovina	7-Mar-06/4:08 PM
By election. I've nominated you.
Re: a comment on There by Dovina	7-Mar-06/4:06 PM
No, of course not, just confused by the things you said.
Re: a comment on There by Dovina	7-Mar-06/4:03 PM
I blame my parents for being so different from each other that I am in constant contradiction with myself. So yeah, I understand where your coming from.
Re: a comment on There by Dovina	7-Mar-06/4:00 PM
Don't you dare. He's my God, all mine, so mnah ;p I'm beginning warm up to the idea of you being the Queen of the Jews. They need some of that new wave approach to their religion. The old one's getting dusty and it's starting to smell bad. Kids, I think we've learned from this to never assume that the God someone is talking about is your God. "So now we know and knowing is half the battle, YOOOOOO JOE".
Re: a comment on There by Dovina	7-Mar-06/3:48 PM
I'm not trying to Dark Angel you and I hope you aren't trying to do the same. Obviously nobody here can tell were your jokes end and your seriousness begins or is it visa-versa. Don't worry though I still find your coyness in these aguments adorable.
Re: a comment on There by Dovina	7-Mar-06/3:36 PM
Queen of the Jews.
Re: a comment on There by Dovina	7-Mar-06/3:35 PM
"Did I use logic to explain God? - Only in saying that if He is God, then he is above our understanding and above our rules." Summary: I don't know God. "Did I preach to you, saying "God is this, God is that"? I have feelings about God as you do, but I don't think I presented mine to you as truths to be heeded." Summary: I still don't know God. "Did I say that I know God? Well maybe I did. It says somwhere that God created me in His image, created all of us in His image. I like to think of the autonoimy that imples, and contained in it, the ability to relinquish my freedom or to use it creatively, in some small image, as God created." Summary: OK, maybe I know God.
Re: a comment on There by Dovina	7-Mar-06/3:29 PM
All I've been saying over and over is that I believe in god for no particular reason besides the strong sense I have of his existence. D.A. may be right, maybe it's just gas. You, I assume are referring to the biblical god for which you have contradicted several times. See as soon as you start to define god, even in the vaguest of ways you automatically start setting up rules around him. You can define God as he who is beyond rules but then by rule he is beyond rules even if he chooses to be within rules. So that in itself is a rule for he must be able to do whatever he wants. Even something that is undefined is by rule without a sure definition aside from the definition that it is not yet defined. Only if you go outside any logical description can you make god exempt from any rule or law. Christians often use your kind of double talk when confronted with defending the logic behind god. Of course if you're just talking about Dovina's god then this conversation truly was pointless.
Re: a comment on There by Dovina	7-Mar-06/2:39 PM
Unlike God, Dovina can say whatever she wants because she's crazy and crazy people don't have to make sense.
Re: a comment on There by Dovina	7-Mar-06/2:33 PM
So now you've reduced your god to someone you could scold. Good for you. "Bad God, look what you did!"(she then rubs his nose in his crap).
Re: a comment on There by Dovina	7-Mar-06/2:18 PM
That's my point. None of us are God's psychologist. It's one thing to say you believe in God, It's another to say you know for instance that he has no hair on his balls. What she's doing is contradicting the bible from which she basis her God on. I'm only saying that I feel his presence but I can't and won't try to define it. Then she goes and changes what she says so that it'll make for a better argument. How blasphemous is that?
Re: a comment on There by Dovina	7-Mar-06/5:52 AM
What rule say's that God can't or won't help a retired negro athelete get away with sawing off his exwife's head with a rusty knife?
Re: a comment on There by Dovina	7-Mar-06/5:42 AM
If he's above our understanding then why even bother believing in him when you have no idea who or what he really is? You link not understanding him to him being exempt from any rules when you obviously can't understand him enough to know whether or not he is exempt from rules. Don't even try to make an excuse for that remark, it's beyond repair. As far as truths to be heeded goes- you're one of the one's warning me about claiming to be damned to hell. Did you say that you know God? Well in your second claim of the above response you say you obviously can't know God because he's above our understanding and then down a little further you say well maybe I do. I went as far as the begining of the universe, quantum physics and even into an ancient philosophy to try to define God and only came out with a Dark Angel thrown egg on my face. Do you really think I give a damn about how you would describe God let alone percieve him. It was you and Amanda that started the preaching.
Re: a comment on There by Dovina	6-Mar-06/2:24 PM
Apparently you get your understanding of God from little monkeys in your head. My God Dovina, where the hell do you think your understanding of God comes from? Is it some other mystical source nobody but you knows about. You see, the minute you start trying to use logic to explain God your fucked. God is hidden from logic. He only shows himself in an emotional presence. You can say I feel him but you can't say I know him. All we know about him is what others have told us about him and the others are all saying you've gone batty Dovina. See, I'm just saying how I feel God's presence, I'm not trying to define God and preach to you saying "God is this, God is that". I'm not saying you're wrong about you're God, I'm saying you're wrong about my God. So back off, And I think I'm speaking for alot of people when I say that.