Poemranker [Poem: Triolet, for Jason] [by beakism] Thu May 02 04:04:55 PDT 2024

[n/a] thepinkbunnyofdoom @ 24.209.21.223 | 6-Jun-03/2:10 PM | Reply

Speaking without Knowledge, isn't that what your mocking me for here? I do Happen to know about Libel and Slander, and copyright protections. I may not be a lawyer but as a DJ for a radio station I have to know about such things.

So next time you assume someone has no clue what the hell they are talking about, make sure they don't.

[n/a] beakism @ 81.86.208.92 > thepinkbunnyofdoom | 6-Jun-03/2:55 PM | Reply

well. I have been well and truly told.

from your incessant babbling about -=Dark_Angel=-'s alleged plagiarism, it really doesn't seem that you do know jack; or that, if you do, you refuse to apply your knowledge. or, if neither of the above, simply that you have no notion of consistency. I seem to recall you telling me that you wouldn't be done for libel, since you'd only said something a few times, and the next minute (or, rather, six minutes later) telling -=Dark_Angel=- that the bare fact of him mentioning something once, without any meaning behind it, was enough to get him sued. Seems pretty plausible, if you ask me.

So next time you assume you can capitalise indiscriminately, or spell wildly incorrectly, make sure you can.

[n/a] thepinkbunnyofdoom @ 24.209.21.223 > beakism | 6-Jun-03/3:11 PM | Reply

No I say things and they come off as being redundant or over lapping. Its because I have slight brain damage from smoking coffee. I was saying(or trying to) that my claim of D.A. comminting Libel and Plagiarism isn't libel because it is in question of the fact of whether or not he had in fact done so. The fact that I wasn't just out and out going and posting on every other poem here that D.A. is Guilty of Plagiarism/Libel but that I kept it within a fine margin, trying to express a complaint is different. To be proven guilty of Libel it only has to be proven that you in fact said it, Satire Laws make it a bit hard to determine if in Fact it is Libel and I'm tired of arguing it. I don't want to have to retrace every comment made in the situtation, nor try and prove the intent behind them.

Don't even go there with my spelling or my caps. My caps mean I'd be stressing the word if I was saying it aloud. Being as to how I CAN type anywhere Muwhahaha I'm pretty sure making sure isn't a problem.

[n/a] thepinkbunnyofdoom @ 24.209.21.223 > thepinkbunnyofdoom | 6-Jun-03/3:32 PM | Reply

I have already begged your forgiveness god! Must I be forever tormented by my aweful sins. I weep tears in Shame for so displeasing you god. I beg only forgiveness.

[n/a] -=Dark_Angel=-, P.I. @ 131.111.213.23 > thepinkbunnyofdoom | 7-Jun-03/7:09 PM | Reply

Do you think it is impossible to derive from your belief-set two statements of the form P and not-P?

[n/a] beakism @ 81.86.208.92 > thepinkbunnyofdoom | 6-Jun-03/3:00 PM | Reply

In any case, before you go on for several pages defending yourself, I really just felt like writing a poem; while I was taking a shower, the two lines came to me, and the rest of the words fitted together quite nicely.

That, and the fact that you smell of wee.

[n/a] thepinkbunnyofdoom @ 24.209.21.223 > beakism | 6-Jun-03/3:12 PM | Reply

Yum WEE

[10] Bill Z Bub @ 24.112.224.232 | 6-Jun-03/4:42 PM | Reply

solid.