-=Dark_Angel=-, P.I.11 Jan 2003

This is great! I can't believe we're having a serious conversation about the lubrication of a shoehorn by a procured parson's nose! It was complete genius of me to use that sentence as the example!!

As for your reply, by the sentence

"The shoehorn the parson's nose the pirate procured lubricated glistened."

I mean that of all the parsons' noses, I am specifically talking about the one that was procured by the pirate. And of all the shoehorns, I specifically mean the one that was lubricated by the aforementioned parson's nose. Moreover, that shoehorn glistened. This is the only possible interpretation of the sentence that makes sense. It is grammatically correct. If you doubt me, Sir, then we shall duel! Or are you a coward?