-=Dark_Angel=-, P.I.25 Mar 2005

My response is right there. You know, in my reply. Here it is again:

"For every possible open valve, there is a possible closed valve that permits as much water." That is the premiss.

"Any valve lets through as much water closed as it does open." That is your thicky misunderstanding of the premiss.

There it is. Have you spotted it now? Do you understand the response? Do you understand how it relates to what you said? Do you understand how it relates to the discussion as a whole? Do you understand how it is a defense of my original theorem? Do you even have any idea what this thread is about?

Every time I think I've finally understood how thick you are, you absolutely blow my estimate out of the water. You have an unbounded capacity for failure.