Dovina23 Jun 2004

Hey, Zodiac, did you consider that Dan’s comment could be taken several ways, as my poem hopefully can. He might have really meant that I would like to see it appear in "Seventh Day Adventist's Monthly" or some similar publication. He could have meant that for it to so appear would be ludicrous. When he says, “Perfect for . . . “ he’s probably being facetious, meaning that it is far less than perfect for such a publication because the poem contains hints that such unbreakable faith is not attainable except in self-deception. I think he just might be able to interpret his way out of a week-old cod-bonnet.